Worms for Immune Regulation of Multiple Sclerosis (WIRMS)

January 28, 2016 updated by: University of Nottingham

Worms for Immune Regulation of Multiple Sclerosis (WIRMS)

The purpose of this study is to determine whether people with MS who are exposed to a small number of hookworms will have less inflammation and less MS disease activity.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

There is evidence that certain parasitic infections may protect against autoimmune or inflammatory diseases, including multiple sclerosis (MS), asthma and type1 diabetes. The 'hygiene hypothesis' postulates exposure to infectious agents confers protection against these disorders. One putative mechanism depends on the activity of regulatory T cells (Treg), naturally occurring or induced cells that prevent excessive immune activation and autoimmunity. Reports in the last 5 years lend credence to the hygiene hypothesis in MS: epidemiological investigations show an inverse relationship to infections with the nematode Trichuris, and a study with serial clinical, immunological and MRI follow-up shows MS patients developing intestinal parasitoses have much milder disease course compared with uninfected matched MS controls followed over 5 years. A role for Treg and also a novel population of B regulatory (Breg) cells is suggested in this study. The University of Nottingham has extensive experience with human parasite research and have completed essential safety studies of controlled infection with hookworm in normal volunteers and people with atopy. Asthma and Crohn's disease studies are underway and show an immunological effect even with 10 larvae. This is the first controlled parasite exposure study in patients with relapsing MS with in 36 patients 25 hookworm larvae vs 36 patients with placebo. Patients will be followed clinically (relapse rate, disability scores), immunologically and radiologically (serial MRI scans with Gadolinium) for 1 year. The cumulative number of new and active lesions on T2 weighted MRI will be the primary outcome measure. Regulatory network induction (Treg induction, Breg/Tr1 and NK) will be the immunological secondary outcome measure. Relapse rate will be secondary clinical outcome measure. A number of clinical, MRI and immune parameters will be exploratory measures. Cytokine profiles, eosinophil and egg counts, IgE and IgG subsets and IgE/IgG4 ratios will be measured, to relate altered immune responses to disease modulation. Immune responses will be assessed to neuroantigen and to mitogen, and parasite antigens (excretory/secretory products). This study will be an essential early step in assessing the potential for therapeutic immunomodulation with parasites in MS.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
72

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United Kingdom
    • Nottinghamshire
      • Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom, NG7 2UH
        • University of Nottingham

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Relapsing remitting MS (RRMS) (McDonald criteria) and secondary MS with super imposing relapse on condition that they fulfil the next conditions, MRI scan consistent with MS by Barkhof or Fazekas criteria
  • Patients with at least 1 relapse in the last 12 months or 2 in the last 24 months;
  • Patients with Expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score in the range of 0 to 5.5 at the screening and week 0 visit
  • Patients of both genders, age >18 years and < 65 years
  • Women of child bearing potential, (who have a negative pregnancy test) must agree to use methods of medically acceptable forms of contraception during the study.
  • Be able and willing to comply with study visits and procedures per protocol.
  • Understand and sign consent form at the screening

Exclusion Criteria:

No populations at risk of severe illness or death will be included in this study

  • Life expectancy < 6 months.
  • Patient is < 5 years free of malignancy, except treated basal cell skin cancer or cervical carcinoma in situ.
  • Patient with grade III/IV cardiac problems as defined by the New York Heart Association Criteria. (i.e., congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction within 6 months of study)
  • Patients with severe and/or uncontrolled medical condition.
  • Pregnancy, lactation or intention to become pregnant during the course of the study (please also see above under inclusion criterion 5)
  • Patient has a known diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
  • Anaemia (Hb <10 g/dL for females, <11 g/dL for males)
  • Prior or present evidence of parasitic infection; prior treatment with anti-helminthic drugs in the last 6 years.
  • Patient with serious medical or psychiatric illness that could potentially interfere with the completion of the study treatment according to this protocol
  • History of poor compliance or history of drug/alcohol abuse, or excessive alcohol consumption that would interfere with the ability to comply with the study protocol,
  • Severe asthma, allergy, other autoimmune disease or any condition that the physician judges could be detrimental to subjects participating in this study; including deviations deemed clinically important from normal clinical laboratory

Previous treatment

  • Treatment with interferon or glatiramer acetate within 8 weeks prior to baseline or immunosuppressive drugs within 12 weeks prior to baseline
  • Treatment with bone marrow transplantation, total lymphoid irradiation, monoclonal antibodies (other than natalizumab, umbilical cord stem cells, AIMSPRO at any time prior to baseline
  • Treatment with corticosteroids or ACTH within 4 weeks prior to baseline
  • Treatment with any investigational agent within 12 weeks prior to baseline

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Hookworm larvae (Necator americanus)
Participants will receive 25 live hookworm larvae
Biological: Hookworm larvae
Hookworm larvae solution is pipetted onto a plaster dressing which is then placed on the upper forearm for 24 hours. This is administered only once.
Other Names:
  • Necator americanus
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo
Participant will receive pharmacopoeial grade water
Biological: Placebo
Pharmacopoeial grade water is pipetted onto a plaster dressing which is then placed on the upper forearm for 24 hours. This is administered only once.
Other Names:
  • Water

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The cumulative number of new or enlarging Gd+ lesions at month 9
Time Frame: Month 9
Month 9

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Percentage of cells positive simultaneously for CD4, CD25, foxp3
Time Frame: End of trial
End of trial
Cumulative number of newly active lesions (new GD+ T1; new and enlarging T2) at month 9
Time Frame: Month 9
Month 9
Change in expanded disability status scale (EDSS) at month 9
Time Frame: Month 9
Month 9

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Nottingham

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Multiple Sclerosis Society

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Cris Constantinescu, MD PhD, University of Nottingham

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 9, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 9, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 11, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 29, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 28, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 08126

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings