Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
Multi-institution, Randomized Trial for Efficacy and Safety of Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Uterine Myoma or Adenomyosis
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Chi-Heum Cho, MD, PhD
- Email: c0035@dsmc.or.kr
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Sang Hun Kwon, MD, PhD
- Email: ksh1999@dsmc.or.kr
Study Locations
-
-
-
Deagu, Korea, Republic of
- Recruiting
- Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital
-
Contact:
- Chi-Heum Cho, MD,PhD
-
Incheon, Korea, Republic of
- Not yet recruiting
- Catholic Incheon hospital
-
Contact:
- Yong Wook Kim
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 135-710
- Recruiting
- Samsung Medical Center
-
Contact:
- Tae Joong Kim, MD
- Phone Number: 82-2-3410-3547
- Email: tj28.kim@gmail.com
-
Principal Investigator:
- Tae Joong Kim
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of
- Not yet recruiting
- Asan Medical Center
-
Contact:
- Yong Man Kim
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of
- Recruiting
- Kangnam Cha Hospital
-
Contact:
- Suk Joo Sung
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of
- Not yet recruiting
- Seoul Catholic Medical Center
-
Contact:
- Soo Young Hur
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of
- Not yet recruiting
- Yonsei University Medical Center
-
Contact:
- Sang Wun Kim
-
Seungnam, Korea, Republic of
- Not yet recruiting
- Seoul university Bundang hospital
-
Contact:
- Yong Beom Kim
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Symptomatic (dysmenorrhea, palpable mass, pelvic pain or discomfort urinary symptom, increasing size, menorrhagia) myomas or adenomyomas
- Uterine size < gestational age of 14 weeks
- Informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Medical diseases such as heart failure, renal insufficiency, liver cirrhosis, pancreatitis, uncontrolled DM
- Huge uterine size > gestational age of 14 weeks
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: SILS
Laparoscopic hysterectomy including LAVH, LH(a), and TLH using SILS port
|
SILS port
|
|
Active Comparator: Conventional multi-port laparoscopic hysterectomy
3-4 ports laparoscopic hysterectomy including LAVH, LH(a), or TLH
|
3-4 conventional ports
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Conversion rate
Time Frame: 1 week
|
Conversion means that events required additional port(s) or open laparotomy
|
1 week
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
12 weeks
|
|
|
Postoperative pain
Time Frame: postop. 1 day, 1 week
|
Measured by numeric rating score (NRS)
|
postop. 1 day, 1 week
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Chi-Heum Cho, MD, PhD, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Lee YY, Kim TJ, Kim CJ, Kang H, Choi CH, Lee JW, Kim BG, Lee JH, Bae DS. Single-port access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a novel method with a wound retractor and a glove. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009 Jul-Aug;16(4):450-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.03.022. Epub 2009 May 31.
- Kim TJ, Lee YY, Cha HH, Kim CJ, Choi CH, Lee JW, Bae DS, Lee JH, Kim BG. Single-port-access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2010 Sep;24(9):2248-52. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0944-y. Epub 2010 Feb 23.
- Jung YW, Lee M, Yim GW, Lee SH, Paek JH, Kwon HY, Nam EJ, Kim SW, Kim YT. A randomized prospective study of single-port and four-port approaches for hysterectomy in terms of postoperative pain. Surg Endosc. 2011 Aug;25(8):2462-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1567-z. Epub 2011 Feb 7.
- Chen YJ, Wang PH, Ocampo EJ, Twu NF, Yen MS, Chao KC. Single-port compared with conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Apr;117(4):906-912. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820c666a.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2011-10-004
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.