Treatments of Acquired Apraxia of Speech (Apraxia)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Utah
-
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84148
- VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Must have acquired apraxia of speech that occurred following a stroke or other brain injury.
- Must be at least 6 months post-onset of brain injury.
- May have aphasia.
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of drug or alcohol abuse.
- History of mental illness.
- Neurological condition other than that which resulted in apraxia of speech.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: SPT-B then SPT-R
Participants first received Sound Production Treatment - Blocked (SPT-B) for 20 treatment sessions spanning approximately 7 weeks.
After a washout period of 2 weeks, they then received Sound Production Treatment - Random (SPT-R) for 20 treatment sessions.
Follow-up measures were conducted at 2, 6, and 10 weeks following the end of all treatment.
|
Sound Production Treatment is a treatment for acquired apraxia of speech.
Combines therapist modeling, simultaneous production, articulatory instruction, feedback and repeated practice.
SPT-Blocked entailed practicing all treatment targets blocked by target.
SPT-Random entailed practicing all treatment targets in a non predictable, random order.
A treatment for acquired apraxia of speech.
Combines therapist modeling, simultaneous production, articulatory instruction, feedback and repeated practice.
SPT-Random entailed practicing treatment targets in a non predictable order.
SPT-Blocked entailed practicing treatment targets blocked by target.
|
|
Experimental: SPT-R then SPT-B
Participants first received Sound Production Treatment - Random (SPT-R) for 20 treatment sessions spanning approximately 7 weeks.
After a washout period of 2 weeks, they then received Sound Production Treatment - Blocked (SPT-B) for 20 treatment sessions.
Follow-up measures were conducted at 2, 6, and 10 weeks following the end of all treatment.
|
Sound Production Treatment is a treatment for acquired apraxia of speech.
Combines therapist modeling, simultaneous production, articulatory instruction, feedback and repeated practice.
SPT-Blocked entailed practicing all treatment targets blocked by target.
SPT-Random entailed practicing all treatment targets in a non predictable, random order.
A treatment for acquired apraxia of speech.
Combines therapist modeling, simultaneous production, articulatory instruction, feedback and repeated practice.
SPT-Random entailed practicing treatment targets in a non predictable order.
SPT-Blocked entailed practicing treatment targets blocked by target.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Speech Production: Effect Size for Treated Items
Time Frame: Pre treatment (2-3 week period preceding the start of treatment) vs. 10 weeks post all treatment
|
Change in accuracy of articulation of trained items as measured from baseline to 10 weeks post treatment using effect size calculations as the indicator of magnitude of change; production of words designated for treatment was measured repeatedly in non treatment probes prior to treatment, throughout all study phases, and at 10 weeks post treatment with percent accuracy calculated for each probe (maximum = 100%, minimum = 0% correct).
Effect size calculations involved calculating the difference between post- and pre-treatment probe accuracy percentages with corrections made for variability (standard deviations in performance).
The larger the effect size, the greater the change in performance from pre-treatment.
Positive effect sizes = increases in accuracy & negative effect sizes = decreases in accuracy.
|
Pre treatment (2-3 week period preceding the start of treatment) vs. 10 weeks post all treatment
|
|
Speech Production: Percent Change in Treated Items
Time Frame: baseline to 10 weeks post treatment
|
Change in accuracy of articulation of treated items as measured by percent increase in accuracy above the highest baseline measurement; production of words designated for treatment was measured repeatedly in non treatment probes prior to treatment, throughout all study phases, and at 10 weeks post treatment with percent accuracy calculated for each probe (0% to 100% correct).
The highest percentage accuracy achieved in pre-treatment probes was subtracted from the percentage accuracy achieved at 10 weeks post-treatment to obtain change in accuracy value - this reflects change from maximum correct performance in baseline (pre-treatment).
e.g., if in baseline probes, performance ranged from 10% to 30% accuracy and at post treatment performance was 90% accuracy, the change value would be 60% (90% minus 30%).
A greater change value indicates greater change in articulation/production of words.
Change could be positive (improved articulation) or negative (poorer articulation).
|
baseline to 10 weeks post treatment
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Speech Production: Percent Change in Untrained Items
Time Frame: baseline to 10 weeks post treatment
|
Percent change in articulatory accuracy of untrained items measured by change in percent accuracy over highest baseline value; production of words designated to NOT receive treatment (untrained items) was measured repeatedly in non treatment probes prior to treatment, throughout all study phases, and at 10 weeks post treatment with percent accuracy calculated for each probe (maximum = 100%, minimum = 0% correct).
Effect size calculations involved calculating the difference between post- and pre-treatment probe accuracy percentages with corrections made for variability (standard deviations in performance).
The larger the effect size, the greater the change in performance from pre-treatment.
Positive effect sizes = increases in accuracy & negative effect sizes = decreases in accuracy.
|
baseline to 10 weeks post treatment
|
|
Speech Production of Untrained Items: Effect Sizes for Untrained Items
Time Frame: Baseline vs. 10 weeks post all treatment
|
Change in accuracy of articulation of untrained items as measured by effect sizes reflecting magnitude of change.
Production of words designated to not receive treatment (i.e., generalization items) was measured repeatedly in non treatment probes prior to treatment, throughout all study phases, and at 10 weeks post treatment with percent accuracy calculated for each probe (0% to 100% correct).
Change in accuracy of articulation of untrained items was measured from baseline to 10 weeks post treatment using effect size calculations as the indicator of magnitude of change.
Effect size calculations involved calculating the difference between post- and pre-treatment probe accuracy percentages with corrections made for variability (standard deviations in performance).
The larger the effect size, the greater the change in performance from pre-treatment.
|
Baseline vs. 10 weeks post all treatment
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Julie L Wambaugh, PhD, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Wambaugh JL, Nessler C, Cameron R, Mauszycki SC. Treatment for acquired apraxia of speech: examination of treatment intensity and practice schedule. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013 Feb;22(1):84-102. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2012/12-0025). Epub 2012 Oct 15.
- Wambaugh J, Shuster L, Bailey DJ, Mauszycki S, Kean J, Nessler C, Wright S, Brunsvold J. Self-Judgments of Word Production Accuracy in Acquired Apraxia of Speech. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2016 Dec 1;25(4S):S716-S728. doi: 10.1044/2016_AJSLP-15-0139.
- Bailey DJ, Eatchel K, Wambaugh J. Sound Production Treatment: Synthesis and Quantification of Outcomes. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015 Nov;24(4):S798-814. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0127.
- Wambaugh JL, Nessler C, Wright S, Mauszycki SC, DeLong C, Berggren K, Bailey DJ. Effects of Blocked and Random Practice Schedule on Outcomes of Sound Production Treatment for Acquired Apraxia of Speech: Results of a Group Investigation. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Jun 22;60(6S):1739-1751. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-16-0249.
- Mauszycki SC, Bailey DJ, Wambaugh JL. Acquired Apraxia of Speech: The Relationship Between Awareness of Errors in Word Productions and Treatment Outcomes. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017 Jun 22;26(2S):664-673. doi: 10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0111.
- Wambaugh J, Nessler C, Wright S, Mauszycki S, DeLong C. Sound production treatment for acquired apraxia of speech: Effects of blocked and random practice on multisyllabic word production. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2016 Oct;18(5):450-64. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2015.1101161. Epub 2015 Nov 9. Erratum In: Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2016 Oct;18(5):i.
- Wambaugh JL, Nessler C, Wright S, Mauszycki SC. Sound production treatment: effects of blocked and random practice. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014 May;23(2):S225-45. doi: 10.1044/2014_AJSLP-13-0072.
- DeLong C, Nessler C, Wright S, Wambaugh J. Semantic Feature Analysis: Further Examination of Outcomes. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015 Nov;24(4):S864-79. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0155.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- C7419-R
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.