GlideScope Groove Versus Macintosh Blade for Double-Lumen Endotracheal Tube Intubation
Comparison of GlideScope Groove to Macintosh Blade for Orotracheal Intubation With Double-Lumen Endotracheal Tube: a Randomised Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
London, Ontario, Canada, N6A5A5
- London Health Sciences Center University Hospital
-
London, Ontario, Canada, N6A5A5
- Victoria Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Any adult patient booked for elective surgery requiring orotracheal intubation with a double lumen endotracheal tube.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any patient with cervical spine abnormalities.
- Any patients with known or probable difficult airways.
- Any patient requiring rapid sequence induction.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: GlideScope Groove
Patient will be intubated using the GlideScope Groove device.
|
GlideScope Groove
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Control
Control Group: Macintosh Blade
|
Control: Patients will be intubated using the Macintosh blade
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Duration of Intubation
Time Frame: Day 1
|
The intubation will be timed using a stopwatch.
|
Day 1
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of failures to intubate
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Number of failures to intubate
|
Day 1
|
|
Number of intubation attempts
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Number of intubation attempts
|
Day 1
|
|
Use of external laryngeal pressure
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Whether or not external laryngeal pressure was needed to facilitate tracheal intubation
|
Day 1
|
|
Laryngoscopic grade distribution
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Cormack and Lehane Grade observed during laryngoscopy
|
Day 1
|
|
Presence of Sore throat
Time Frame: Day 3
|
Sore throat will be graded on POD #2 as none, mild, moderate, or severe
|
Day 3
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Timothy P Turkstra, University of Western Ontario, Canada
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 18478
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.