Musculotendinous Tissue Unit Repair and Reinforcement (MTURR) Coordinating Center (MTURR)

October 19, 2016 updated by: J. Peter Rubin, MD, University of Pittsburgh

Musculotendinous Tissue Unit Repair and Reinforcement (MTURR) With the Use of Biologic Scaffolds for Patients Suffering From Severe Skeletal Muscle Injury (Coordinating Center Protocol)

The objective of the study is to assess mechanical strength and function in subjects undergoing Musculotendinous Tissue Unit Repair and Reinforcement (MTURR) with the use of biologic scaffolds for the restoration of both mechanical strength and function in these subjects. This study will formally evaluate healing and return of function after an extracellular matrix device implantation in 40 male and female subjects participating at 4-5 military sites who suffer from injury with loss of skeletal muscle tissue. The University of Pittsburgh under the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery is the Coordinating Center for this multi-site study.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Loss of musculotendinous tissue as a result of trauma inevitably leads to severe morbidity for the subject and surgical challenges for the caregiver. The reconstruction of tissue following such injuries is often not possible and surgical options are extremely limited. Amputation of the affected limb is not an uncommon outcome. Free muscle grafts, pedicle grafts, and the use of prosthetic materials have all been attempted when primary repair is not possible due to loss of tissue domain. The results of such efforts are typically disheartening. If autologous grafts are used, donor site morbidity compounds the post surgical problems with resultant diminished quality of life. Stated differently, the existing treatment options for treatment of the loss of large amounts of skeletal muscle tissue with scarring are extremely limited because the existing tendon structures are damaged and lack strength. A Repair and Reinforcement approach with a biocompatible device would represent a paradigm shift in the treatment of traumatic tissue injury. This approach involves releasing scar tissue that constricts movement of the existing tendon, repairing damaged tendon and musculotendinous units with suture repair, and reinforcing the repair with a biologic scaffold material. The biologic scaffold is composed of animal derived collagen and the approved by the FDA as devices for reinforcement of soft tissues repaired by sutures or suture anchors, during tendon repair surgery." Additionally, as listed in the FDA 510k approval, these devices" provide a remodelable scaffold that is replaced by the subject's own soft tissues." These biologic materials fall into a category of implantable devices known as extracellular matrix (ECM) because they are composed of proteins that surround the cellular elements in mammals. No living cells are found in these ECM implantable devices. ECM devices are made by many commercial manufacturers and have been used for a variety of reconstructive surgical procedures for years. Because the ECM implant becomes populated with subject cells and blood vessels, the repair may be stronger and the new tissue growing within the device could possibly contribute to improved function by augmenting the tendon structure and allowing ingrowth of adjacent muscle fibers. The objective of the study is to assess mechanical strength and function in subjects undergoing Musculotendinous Tissue Unit Repair and Reinforcement (MTURR) with the use of biologic scaffolds for the restoration of both mechanical strength and function in these subjects. This study will formally evaluate healing and return of function after an extracellular matrix device implantation in 40 male and female subjects participating at 4-5 military sties who suffer from injury with loss of skeletal muscle tissue. The University of Pittsburgh under the Department of Plastic Surgery is the Coordinating Center for this multi-site study.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • University of Pittsburgh

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with the following characteristics will be eligible to participate in the study:

    • Age: 18 to 70 years of age and able to provide informed consent
    • Civilian, and current or former military personnel are eligible to participate
    • Have suffered injury resulting in a structural deficit of a minimum of 20% of the muscle group mass and a functional deficit of a minimum of 25% when compared to the contralateral limb; or if bilateral injury is present to extremities, the potential surgical extremity is to be compared against normal expected values of a sample population of similar age and gender, and evidence of remaining tendon and musculotendinous units that could be surgically repaired with sutures.
    • Injuries may encompass a single muscle belly or compartment. Whether an area is expected to be repaired by sutures will be determined from imaging studies and physical examination.
    • Have suffered traumatic injury within the last 18 months to the upper and/or lower extremity; Target of 18 months or less but subject's may be enrolled with injury outside this range if the principal investigator determines that there is viable muscle in the injured compartment determined by clinical exam and imaging studies.
    • Eligible for study procedures 3 months post injury with stability determined by the Principal Investigator and/ or MD Co-Investigator
    • Willing and able to comply with follow up examinations, radiographic studies, physical therapy, muscle biopsy and laboratory tests.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with the following characteristics will be excluded from participating in the study:

    • Inability to provide informed consent
    • Poor nutrition (demonstrated by abnormal lab range for serum Albumin and Pre-Albumin values)
    • Chronic disease such as congestive heart failure, liver disease, renal disease, or diabetes
    • Active and unstable disease state or infection anywhere in the body per MD's evaluation and determination (demonstrated by stated or medical record history and abnormal lab range for CBC with Differential and Platelet, and chemistry panel values)
    • Known coagulopathy (demonstrated by stated or medical record history of diagnosis)
    • Pregnancy (demonstrated by a positive result of a urine pregnancy test)
    • Diagnosis of cancer within last 12 months and /or actively receiving chemotherapy or radiation treatment
    • Axis I diagnosis DSM-IV (e.g., Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder). Subjects who are found to be stable on medication and receive psychiatric clearance could be eligible for study participation per the Physician's discretion
    • Subjects with complete muscle/tendon gaps greater than 5 cm that are obvious on imaging studies and are unlikely to be reasonably repaired with sutures and reinforcement, and will be excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Extracellular Matrix
Implantation of Extracellular Matrix
Device: Extracellular Matrix
Extracellular Matrix

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mechanical strength and function
Time Frame: Approximately 6 months post-operative
The primary objective of the study is to assess mechanical strength and function of surgical extremity in patients undergoing Musculotendinous Tissue Unit Repair and Reinforcement (MTURR) with the use of biologic scaffolds for the restoration of both mechanical strength and function in these patients. Physical therapy evaluations of strength and active/passive range of motion and self-reported measures of ability to perform activities of daily living.
Approximately 6 months post-operative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pathology Evaluation
Time Frame: Approximately 6 months post-operative
The secondary objective is to examine the cellular properties of the biopsy tissue material from the Extracellular Matrix surgical site for reabsorption and replacement by the subjects own soft tissue with pathological findings to be correlated with clinical outcomes.
Approximately 6 months post-operative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Pittsburgh

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
United States Naval Medical Center, San Diego
United States Naval Medical Center, Portsmouth

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 9, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 21, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 22, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 21, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 19, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PRO11050209

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings