The Effects of Ranolazine on Exercise Capacity in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (RAZE)

January 9, 2020 updated by: Denise Barnard, University of California, San Diego
The purpose of this study is to determine whether treatment with Ranolazine will improve exercise capacity in patients with Heart Failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, or HFPEF.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Denise Barnard, M.D., and her associates, are conducting a research study to find out more about ways to improve symptoms in patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFPEF). Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is a condition where the heart squeezes well but is stiff. This stiffness in the heart muscle makes the heart unable to fill, leading to shortness of breath and decreased exercise tolerance. Subjects with HFPEF are asked to participate in this study. There will be approximately 40 participants enrolled in this study. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of Ranolazine (Ranexa) in patients with HFPEF. The study is sponsored by the manufacturers of the drug, Gilead Pharmaceuticals.

Ranolazine is a drug that affects the ion channels in the heart. In patients with heart failure, these ion channels do not work properly, and contribute to make the heart stiff. A stiff heart leads to the symptoms of shortness of breath which patients with HFPEF experience. Due to its properties, Ranolazine may improve this stiffness. Ranolazine could improve subject's shortness of breath and ability to exercise.

Currently, ranolazine carries FDA approval for the treatment of chronic angina only. We intend to study ranolazine in patients with HFPEF, in the absence of documented ischemia, to determine whether the drug's lusitropic properties can improve exercise capacity in HFPEF patients.

Previous trials of ranolazine in patients with chronic angina found that there was a dose-dependent relationship between improvements in exercise capacity and ranolazine. However, there did appear to be a plateau in which 1500 mg of ranolazine twice daily improved exercise capacity only slightly more than 1000 mg of ranolazine given twice daily. Additionally, there was a substantially higher rate of adverse events (mainly nausea, dizziness, and asthenia) with the higher dose. Given the desire to maximize benefit and minimize the risk of adverse events, ranolazine 1000 mg by mouth twice daily was chosen as the target dose.

To properly evaluate the effects of Ranolazine, this research study is set up as a double blind, placebo controlled study. Subjects will be randomly assigned (like rolling a dice) to either Ranolazine or placebo (inactive substance). Subjects will have a 50% chance of getting the study drug and 50% chance of getting placebo.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
10

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92037
        • University of California, San Diego

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

I. Inclusion Criteria

  • Age > 18 years old

  • Diagnosis of Heart Failure (HF) with Preserved Ejection Fraction (PEF)

    • Signs or symptoms of heart failure (breathlessness, pulmonary congestion, edema, fatigue), NYHA (New York Heart Association) Class II-III HF AND
    • LVEF (Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction) > 45% AND

    • Evidence of elevated LV filling pressures

      1. E/e-prime (E/e') mitral ratio > 8. Mitral E/e' ratio has been proposed as a noninvasive measure of left ventricular filling pressure.
      2. Brain natiuretic peptide (BNP) > 80 pg/mL. BNP is biomarker of ventricular wall stress.
  • Pulmonary Artery systolic pressure estimated at > 35 mm Hg on echocardiography
  • Stable medical management for at least 1 month

II. Exclusion Criteria

  • Inability to perform 6 minute walk (6MW) test or 6 minute walk distance > 550 meters at baseline
  • Inability to perform the Naughton protocol exercise test, or an absolute contraindication to exercise testing
  • Decompensated heart failure
  • Clinically significant valvular disease or congenital cardiac defects
  • Clinical diagnosis of Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or significant lung pathology
  • Prior treatment with ranolazine
  • Percutaneous coronary intervention within the past 6 months or planned intervention during the study period
  • Acute coronary syndrome within the prior 2 months
  • Presence of uncorrected perfusion defects on stress testing
  • Presence of angina
  • Any rhythm other than sinus
  • Electrocardiogram measured QTc interval > 500 msec
  • Clinically significant hepatic impairment (ALT/AST > 3x upper limit of normal)
  • Participation in another investigational drug or device study within 1 month prior to screening
  • Females of childbearing potential
  • Current treatment with potent inhibitors of hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme complex pathways affecting drug metabolism (e.g. ketoconazole, itraconazole, clarithromycin, nefazodone, nelfinavir, ritonavir, indinavir, and saquinavir)
  • Current treatment with CYP3A and/or P-Glycoprotein (Pgp) inducers (e.g. rifampin, rifampicin, carbamazepine, St. John's wort)
  • Any other conditions that in the opinion of the investigators are likely to prevent compliance with the study protocol or pose a safety concern if the subject participates in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Ranolazine
Patients with be given 500 mg by mouth twice a day for three days, and then the dose will be increased to 1000 mg by mouth twice daily thereafter. (patients who concurrently take moderate CYP3A inhibitors including diltiazem, verapamil, aprepitant, erythromycin, and fluconazole will continue to 500 mg by mouth twice a day for the entire dosing period)
Drug: Ranolazine
Patients with be given 500 mg by mouth twice a day for three days, and then the dose will be increased to 1000 mg by mouth twice daily thereafter. (patients who concurrently take moderate CYP3A inhibitors including diltiazem, verapamil, aprepitant, erythromycin, and fluconazole will continue to 500 mg by mouth twice a day for the entire dosing period)
Other Names:
  • Ranexa
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Patients will be given 1 tab twice a day for 3 days, then increasing to 2 tabs twice a day thereafter (patients who concurrently take moderate CYP3A inhibitors, will be given 1 tab twice daily for the entire dosing period)
Drug: Placebo
Patients will be given 1 tab twice a day for 3 days, then increasing to 2 tabs twice a day thereafter (patients who concurrently take moderate CYP3A inhibitors, will be given 1 tab twice daily for the entire dosing period)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Exercise Capacity at 6 Weeks
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Exercise capacity in terms of exercise duration (time in seconds) as described for the baseline value, is repeated at 6 weeks.
6 weeks
Change in Oxygen Consumption (VO2) at 6 Weeks
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Oxygen consumption (VO2) as described at baseline is remeasured after 6 weeks of drug vs placebo.
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Quality of Life (QOL) Score
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (HF) Questionnaire was re-administered at the 6 week time point. The total quality of life (QOL) scores were compared to the baseline score. The well-validated Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire is self-administered, has 21 questions and takes 5-10 minutes to complete. The test measures perceived health-related QOL. Each question is scored from 0 to 5 on the Likert scale, where 0 is 'none', and 5 is 'very much'. QOL scores range from 0 to 105; a lower score represents a better quality of life. After an intervention, a decrease in score reflects an improvement in QOL. A minimally important difference in the total score is 5 points.
6 weeks
Change in Doppler Echocardiographic Parameters, Septal E/e' Ratio (E/e')
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Doppler echo allows non-invasive evaluation of diastolic cardiac function. The mitral inflow velocity (E) correlates with LV filling pressure, but is influenced by myocardial relaxation time (RT) and filling pressure. The early diastolic septal mitral annular tissue velocity (e') varies with RT alone. The unitless ratio of the E to e' velocities (E/e') is considered a reliable surrogate of LV filling pressure. Prediction of normal diastolic filling pressure is most reliable when E/e' is < 8; and of abnormal filling pressure when E/e' is > 15. The percent change is reported.
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of California, San Diego

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Gilead Sciences

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Denise D Barnard, MD, University of California, San Diego

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 8, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 5, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 6, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 18, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 9, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IN-US-259-0109
  • 110344 (Other Identifier: UCSD Human Research Protections Program)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings