Evaluation of a Mixed Bowel Prep (2L PEG + Bisacodyl) Versus PEG With Ascorbate

January 11, 2012 updated by: Promefarm S.r.l.

Low Volume Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: a Comparison Between PEG-CS Plus Bisacodyl Versus PEG-ASC

It is hypothesized that PEG 2L with citrate and simeticone plus bisacodyl will have similar bowel cleansing efficacy versus PEG 2L with ascorbate. Safety, tolerability, acceptance and compliance of the two reduced volume PEG-based bowel preparation will be also compared.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
408

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Italy
      • Brescia, Italy, 25123
        • Spedali Civili
      • Firenze, Italy, 50134
        • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi
      • Roma, Italy, 00185
        • Nuovo Regina Margherita
    • Foggia
      • San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy, 71013
        • IRCCS Ospedale Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza
    • Milano
      • Rozzano, Milano, Italy, 20089
        • IRCCS Humanitas

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Out-patients undergoing a complete colonoscopy
  • Patient written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating women or at a risk of becoming pregnant
  • Hypersensitivity to any of the ingredients
  • History of anaphylaxis to drugs or allergic reactions in general
  • Known or suspected gastrointestinal obstruction or perforation
  • Toxic megacolon; major colonic resection
  • Heart failure (Class III or IV); severe renal failure; relevant diseases, that may interfere with the aim of the study
  • Phenylketonuria;Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency
  • Unwillingness to co-operate and to comply with the requirements of the trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: 2L PEG-CS plus bisacodyl
Patients will be asked to take 2L PEG-CS plus bisacodyl (10-20 mg according to patient bowel habit)
Drug: 2L PEG-CS plus bisacodyl
Patients will be asked to take 2L of Lovolesse and bisacodyl (10-20 mg according to patient bowel habit)
Other Names:
  • Lovolesse 2L plus Lovoldyl 5 mg (2-4 tablets)
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: 2L PEG-ASC
Patients will be asked to take PEG-ASC according to labeling instructions
Drug: 2L PEG-ASC
Patients will asked to take PEG-ASC according to labeling instructions
Other Names:
  • Moviprep

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of the quality of bowel preparation by BBPS
Time Frame: 20 minutes
BBPS is an established rating scale to evaluate the quality of bowel preparation. A score greater than 6 is considered as success. The rate of success will be compared between the two groups.
20 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in mucosal visibility between the two groups
Time Frame: 20 minutes
Three point rating scale(0-2).
20 minutes
Number of patients with adverse events
Time Frame: 24 hours
Patient questioning.
24 hours
Difference in tolerability between the two groups
Time Frame: 24 hours
Difference in the percentage of patients in the two groups who developed GI symptoms related to bowel preparation.
24 hours
Difference in patients acceptability between the two groups
Time Frame: 24 hours
Difference in the percentage of patients in the two groups who were willing to repeat the preparation and easy to take the bowel preparation.
24 hours
Difference in patients compliance between the two groups
Time Frame: 24 hours
Difference in the percentage of patients who took at least 75% of bowel preparation.
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Promefarm S.r.l.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Alessandro Repici, MD, IRCSS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano (MI) - Italy
  • Principal Investigator: Renzo Cestari, Prof. MD, Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia - Italy
  • Principal Investigator: Cesare Hassan, MD, Nuovo Regina Margherita, Roma - Italy
  • Principal Investigator: Angelo Andriulli, MD, IRCCS Ospedale Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo - Italy
  • Principal Investigator: Vito Annese, MD, Ospedale Careggi, Firenze - Italy

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2010

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 4, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 11, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 12, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 12, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 11, 2012

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PMF105BC1/09

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings