Femoral Tunnel Position on Conventional MRI After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction-Transtibial Technique Versus Transportal Technique
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 138-708
- National Police Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament rupture
Exclusion Criteria:
- female
- over 45 years old
- the subjects who had ACL reconstruction with graft other than Achilles allograft
- the subjects who had concomitant other ligament injuries on the same knee needing surgical treatment
- revision ACL reconstruction
- double bundle ACL reconstruction
- concomitant full thickness cartilage injury needing cartilage repairing surgery
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: transtibial technique
In anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, femoral tunnel was made via tibial tunnel.
|
Femoral tunnel was made via tibial tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
femoral and tibial tunneling graft fixation on the femoral side with endobutton and on the tibial side with post-tie and interference screw
|
|
Active Comparator: Transportal technique
In anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, femoral tunnel was made via anteromedial portal.
|
femoral and tibial tunneling graft fixation on the femoral side with endobutton and on the tibial side with post-tie and interference screw
Femoral tunnel was made via anteromedial portal in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Lysholm score
Time Frame: at least two years after surgery
|
Lysholm score was superior in transportal technique to transtibial technique.
|
at least two years after surgery
|
|
Position of femoral tunnel aperture
Time Frame: within one week after surgery
|
The position of the femoral tunnel aperture with transportal technique was more posterior than that of transtibial technique.
|
within one week after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- NPH2008-004
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.