The Global Shoulder Concept (GSC) Method Versus Classic Physical Therapy for Shoulder Tendinitis
Comparison of the Global Shoulder Concept (GSC) Method Versus Classic Physical Therapy for Shoulder Tendinitis: a Prospective, Randomized Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Secondary objectives:
- To study the evolution of passive glenohumeral range of motion
- To study the evolution of the global range of passive and active motion for each method used
- To evaluate functional recovery (DASH)
- To evaluate the impact on quality of life (SF36)
- To study the difference in visual analog scale scores for pain during physical therapy sessions
- Compare the two methods/groups after three months.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Montpellier, France, 34295
- CHU de Montpellier - Hôpital Lapeyronie
-
Nîmes Cedex 9, France, 30029
- CHU de Nîmes - Hopital Universitaire Caremeau
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- The patient must have given his/her informed and signed consent
- The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
- painful, chronic tendinopathy (more than 3 months) of the rotator cuff, confirmed by MRI
Exclusion Criteria:
- The patient is pregnant or breastfeeding
- Any emergency situation
- Non-mechanical tendinopathies (metabolic, neurological, capsulitis, reflex sympathetic dystrophy) and tendon surgery (tendon surgery and acromioplasty)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: GSC physcial therapy
Patients included in this arm of the study will follow the Global Shoulder Concept physical therapy sequence.
|
Global Shoulder Concept physical therapy sequence for shoulder tendonitis.
The procedures used in this protocol refer to physical therapy sequences, not to devices or drugs.
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Standard
Patients in this arm of the study will follow the standard physical therapy sequence.
|
Standard physical therapy sequence for shoulder tendonitis.
The procedures used in this protocol refer to physical therapy sequences, not to devices or drugs.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
change in FI2S score
Time Frame: 90 days
|
90 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in visual analog scale for pain
Time Frame: Day 1 versus baseline
|
Day 1 versus baseline
|
|
|
Change in visual analog scale for pain
Time Frame: Day 5 versus baseline
|
Day 5 versus baseline
|
|
|
Change in visual analog scale for pain
Time Frame: Day 12 versus baseline
|
Day 12 versus baseline
|
|
|
Change in visual analog scale for pain
Time Frame: Day 19 versus baseline
|
Day 19 versus baseline
|
|
|
Change in visual analog scale for pain
Time Frame: Day 26 versus baseline
|
Day 26 versus baseline
|
|
|
Change in visual analog scale for pain
Time Frame: Day 90 versus baseline
|
Day 90 versus baseline
|
|
|
Scapulohumeral amplitude gain in 3 main directions
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Passive and active mobility are evaluated by manual goniometry.
|
Day 1
|
|
Scapulohumeral amplitude gain in 3 main directions
Time Frame: Day 26
|
Passive and active mobility are evaluated by manual goniometry.
|
Day 26
|
|
Scapulohumeral amplitude gain in 3 main directions
Time Frame: Day 90
|
Passive and active mobility are evaluated by manual goniometry.
|
Day 90
|
|
Functional gain as measured by the DASH self questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Day 1
|
|
|
Functional gain as measured by the DASH self questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 5
|
Day 5
|
|
|
Functional gain as measured by the DASH self questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 12
|
Day 12
|
|
|
Functional gain as measured by the DASH self questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 19
|
Day 19
|
|
|
Functional gain as measured by the DASH self questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 26
|
Day 26
|
|
|
Functional gain as measured by the DASH self questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 90
|
Day 90
|
|
|
FI2S score
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Day 1
|
|
|
FI2S score
Time Frame: Day 5
|
Day 5
|
|
|
FI2S score
Time Frame: Day 12
|
Day 12
|
|
|
FI2S score
Time Frame: Day 19
|
Day 19
|
|
|
FI2S score
Time Frame: Day 26
|
Day 26
|
|
|
SF36 self questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Day 1
|
|
|
SF36 self questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 26
|
Day 26
|
|
|
SF36 self questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 90
|
Day 90
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Dominique Richard, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- PHRIP/2011/DR-03
- 2011-A01168-33 (OTHER: RCB number)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.