International Research Consortium on Dengue Risk Assessment, Management, and Surveillance (IDAMS)

October 10, 2016 updated by: Thomas Jaenisch, University of Heidelberg Medical Center

Clinical Evaluation of Dengue and Identification of Risk Factors for Severe Disease (WP1)

Improvements in diagnosis of dengue fever and prediction of which patients will get more severe disease are urgently needed to improve the treatment of patients with dengue. This is very important in places with many people who suffer from dengue but have limited health care resources. This study will enroll patients with fever which may be caused by dengue in 6 countries with high incidence of dengue over two continents (Brazil, Cambodia, El Salvador, Indonesia, Malaysia and Vietnam). All patients will be followed by a doctor with blood tests and exams until they recover. Symptoms and laboratory tests will be followed so that the cause of fever can be determined. For patients who have dengue, the investigators will look for symptoms and tests which indicate more serious disease. This study will help to determine how to identify patients with dengue fever based on symptoms and simple laboratory tests and those who will get more serious disease. It will also help to define a more standardized management of patients with dengue fever.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Improvements in clinical diagnosis of dengue and risk prediction for severe disease are urgently needed to improve overall clinical care, especially in settings with a high case burden where appropriate allocation of limited resources is crucial to outcome. In this work package 10,000 outpatients with undifferentiated fever, consistent with possible dengue, will be recruited within 3 days of fever onset in 6 endemic countries (Brazil, Cambodia, El Salvador, Indonesia, Malaysia and Vietnam), and will be followed daily until full recovery. Clinical features and simple laboratory parameters differentiating dengue from other febrile illness will be identified, and, among those with confirmed dengue, risk factors for progression to more severe disease will be evaluated. As well as contributing to the development of diagnostic and prognostic algorithms the clinical cohort has considerable potential towards standardisation of procedures for dengue management and reporting.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
7411

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Bangladesh
      • Dhaka, Bangladesh, 1212
        • International Centre for Diarrhoeal Diseases
  • Brazil
      • Fortaleza, Brazil
        • Fundacao Universidade Estadual do Ceara
      • Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
        • Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
  • Cambodia
      • Siem Reap, Cambodia
        • Angkor Hospital for Children
  • El Salvador
      • San Salvador, El Salvador
        • Hospital National de Ninos Benjamin Bloom
  • Indonesia
      • Yogyakarta, Indonesia
        • Gadjah Madah University
  • Malaysia
      • Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
        • University of Malaya Medical Centre
  • Venezuela
      • Valencia, Venezuela
        • Universidad de Carabobo
  • Vietnam
      • Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
        • Oxford University Clinical Research Unit

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Febrile patients presenting to outpatient clinic

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • >= 5 years of age
  • fever for less than 72 hours

Exclusion Criteria:

  • presence of localizing signs suggestive of another diagnosis
  • not likely to come back for daily follow-up
  • complications or signs of severe disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Febrile Patients
Observation of patients with possible dengue fever in the early phase of disease
Other: Observation
Clinical follow-up and laboratory investigations.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospitalization or administration of IV fluid
Time Frame: 14 days
Proportion of dengue patients hospitalized or treated with IV fluids within 14 days of enrollment.
14 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Development of severe disease
Time Frame: 14 days
Development of severe disease according to the 2009 WHO Dengue classification within 14 days of enrollment.
14 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Heidelberg Medical Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of Oxford
European Union

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Thomas Jänisch, Heidelberg University Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 7, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 8, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 9, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 11, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 10, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 281803 (EU FP7-HEALTH-2011)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings