Evaluation of Web-based Training to Educate Physicians in the Methods of Interpreting Florbetapir-PET Scans

May 3, 2012 updated by: Avid Radiopharmaceuticals
This study will investigate the performance of physician readers trained to read florbetapir-PET scans using electronic media training.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Avid has previously developed a florbetapir-PET scan binary read methodology and training program, which was successfully applied in studies 18F-AV-45-A08(NCT01565369), 18F-AV-45-A09(NCT01565382) and 18F-AV-45-A16(NCT01447719). In these previous studies, training was conducted in-person. Study 18F-AV-45-PT01 will evaluate an automated version of this training program suitable for web-based distribution. Nuclear medicine physicians will complete the automated training program then read the florbetapir-PET images from 151 subjects with repeat readings of 33 randomly selected images. Readers will rate each case as either positive for significant tracer accumulation in cortical gray matter or negative for significant tracer accumulation in cortical gray matter. The inter-rater reliability, sensitivity and specificity of the readers will be evaluated.

The primary image set for determination of inter-reader agreement is comprised of images from 119 subjects from two previous clinical studies (A07[NCT00857415]/A16[NCT01447719] and A05[NCT00702143]). This included all 59 subjects who came to autopsy in Study A07(NCT00857415) and it's follow-up study, A16(NCT01447719), and a set of 60 cases randomly selected from Study A05(NCT00702143) subjects, including 20 cognitively-normal controls, 20 with mild cognitive impairment) MCI, 20 with AD.

Subsequently, the protocol was amended to include all remaining A05(NCT00702143) MCI patients that were not used in the training program (n=32); 13 of these 32 scans presented for repeat reading (to increase the number of A05 MCI cases with repeated reads to 20). This increased the number of unique cases in the validation dataset to 151 scans with 33 scans repeated yielding a total of 184 scans reviewed by the readers.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
151

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Eligibility for subjects scans to be used in this study is determined by subject's eligibility/enrollment in Study A05 (NCT00702143) or A07 (NCT00857415).

Alzheimer's disease (AD) group key eligibility criteria (from Study A05[NCT00702143]):

  • Male or female at least 50 years of age
  • Have probable AD per National Institute of Neurological and Communication Disorders and Stroke (NINCDS) criteria
  • Mini mental state exam (MMSE) score between 10 and 24 inclusive

Mild cognitive impairment group key eligibility criteria (from Study A05[NCT00702143):

  • Male or female at least 50 years of age
  • Complaints of memory or cognitive decline corroborated by an informant
  • Clinical dementia rating of 0.5
  • No obvious cause for cognitive impairment (eg, head trauma or stroke)
  • Cognitive impairment onset within the past year
  • MMSE score greater than 24

Cognitively normal volunteer group key eligibility criteria (from Study A05[NCT00702143]):

  • Male or female at least 50 years of age
  • MMSE score greater than or equal to 29 and cognitively normal by informant report and psychometric test battery at screening

Autopsy cohort key eligibility criteria (from Study A07[NCT00857415]):

  • Male or female 18 years or older
  • Projected life expectancy of less than 6 months
  • Consent to brain donation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Inter-rater Reliability
Time Frame: Scan acquired 50-60 min post-injection
Measure of agreement among five readers using a binary read method (amyloid positive/negative) calculated using Fleiss' kappa. All scans were read in a blinded fashion without access to clinical information.
Scan acquired 50-60 min post-injection

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity of Florbetapir-PET to Detect Moderate to Frequent Beta-amyloid Neuritic Plaques (Probable/Definite Alzheimer's Disease)
Time Frame: at autopsy, within 2 years of scan
Calculated as the percent of true positives which are correctly identified
at autopsy, within 2 years of scan
Specificity of Florbetapir-PET to Detect no or Sparse Beta-amyloid Neuritic Plaques (Probable/Definite Alzheimer's Disease)
Time Frame: at autopsy, within 2 years of scan
Calculated as the percent of true negatives which are correctly identified
at autopsy, within 2 years of scan

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Median Sensitivity and Specificity vs. CERAD Diagnosis
Time Frame: Baseline scan
Median sensitivity and specificity for 5 independent readers to detect moderate to frequent amyloid plaques (per CERAD criteria).
Baseline scan

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Avid Radiopharmaceuticals

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 6, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 7, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 12, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 7, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 3, 2012

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 18F-AV-45-PT01

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neurodegenerative Diseases

Clinical Trials on florbetapir F 18

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings