Assess the Efficacy of AZD8931 in Combination With Paclitaxel Versus Paclitaxel Alone in Patients With Gastric Cancer

September 11, 2014 updated by: AstraZeneca

A Phase IIa Multi-centre Randomised Double-Blind Placebo-controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of AZD8931 in Combination With Paclitaxel Versus Paclitaxel Alone in Patients With Metastatic, Gastric or Gastro-oesophageal Junction, Cancer Who Progress Following First Line Therapy and Are Ineligible for Treatment With Trastuzumab by HER2 Status (SAGE)

The purpose of the study is to assess the efficacy and safety and PK of AZD8931 plus paclitaxel versus paclitaxel alone in patients with metastatic, gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction, cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

A Phase IIa Multi-centre Randomised Double-Blind Placebo-controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of AZD8931 in Combination with Paclitaxel versus Paclitaxel alone in Patients with Metastatic, Gastric or Gastro-oesophageal Junction, Cancer who progress following First Line Therapy and are Ineligible for Treatment with trastuzumab by HER2 Status (SAGE)

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
39

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
      • Hamburg, Germany
        • Research Site
      • Köln, Germany
        • Research Site
  • Japan
      • Chuo-ku, Japan
        • Research Site
      • Fukuoka-shi, Japan
        • Research Site
      • Kawasaki-shi, Japan
        • Research Site
      • Matsuyama-shi, Japan
        • Research Site
      • Sapporo-shi, Japan
        • Research Site
  • Korea, Republic of
      • Jeonju-si, Korea, Republic of
        • Research Site
      • Seongnam-si, Korea, Republic of
        • Research Site
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Research Site
  • Spain
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Research Site
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Research Site
      • Valencia, Spain
        • Research Site
  • Taiwan
      • Taichung, Taiwan
        • Research Site
      • Taipei, Taiwan
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female aged 18 years or older (20 years or older in Japan)
  • Patients must have radiologically confirmed progression following 1st line fluoropyrimidine and platinum based treatment for metastatic gastric cancer (the date of progression and start of first line treatment to be captured on the database)
  • Suitable for paclitaxel therapy.
  • At least one lesion, not previously irradiated and not chosen for a mandatory fresh tumour biopsy during the study screening period, that can be accurately measured at baseline by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and is suitable for accurate repeat assessment.
  • Ineligible for trastuzumab treatment by local assessment. This should include IHC analysis to determine HER2 status with further testing by FISH/CISH when considered part of local practice. Eligible patients are defined as; HER2 IHC 0, HER2 IHC +1 and +2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have received more than 1 prior chemotherapy regimen for metastatic gastric cancer. (chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment is permitted).
  • Any prior taxane therapy (at any time from diagnosis of gastric cancer)
  • Any prior therapy with an inhibitor of ErbB1 (EGFR) or ErbB2 (HER2) (eg, lapatinib)
  • Resting ECG with measurable QTc(F) interval of greater than 480 msec at 2 or more time points within a 24 hour period (see section 6.4.9.1 )
  • Unresolved toxicity grater than CTCAE grade 2 (except alopecia) from previous anti-cancer therapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: 1
Drug: AZD8931
40 mg, oral dose twice daily
Drug: Paclitaxel
IV once weekly for 3 weeks followed by a week off.
Placebo Comparator: 2
Drug: Paclitaxel
IV once weekly for 3 weeks followed by a week off.
Drug: Placebo
Placebo, oral dose twice daily

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in Tumour Size at 8 Weeks Were Analyzed for Comparing Relative Efficacy of AZD8931 Plus Paclitaxel With Paclitaxel Alone
Time Frame: Baseline and 8 weeks, accessed up to data cut off on 4 December 2012
Baseline and 8 weeks, accessed up to data cut off on 4 December 2012

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression-free Survival (PFS) Were Analysed for Comparing Relative Efficacy of AZD8931 Plus Paclitaxel With Paclitaxel Alone
Time Frame: Baseline and every 8 weeks, accessed up to data cut off on 4 December 2012
Time from the date of randomization until the date of objective disease progression (as per RECIST1.1) or the date of death (by any cause in absence of progression).
Baseline and every 8 weeks, accessed up to data cut off on 4 December 2012
The Objective Response Rate (ORR) Was Analysed for Investigating the Efficacy of AZD8931 Plus Paclitaxel With Paclitaxel Alone
Time Frame: Baseline and 8 weeks, accessed up to data cut off on 4 December 2012
The number of subjects with at least one visit response of CR or PR. (Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Progressive disease (PD), A ≥ 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions and an absolute increase of ≥ 5mm; Stable disease (SD), Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD; Not Evaluable (NE), All target lesion measurements are missing or >1/3 target lesion measurements are missing and sum of diameters of non-missing target lesions does not qualify for PD; Not applicable (NA), No target lesions are recorded at baseline)
Baseline and 8 weeks, accessed up to data cut off on 4 December 2012

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
AstraZeneca

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Serban Ghiorghiu, M. D., Scarborough General Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 13, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 17, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 18, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 12, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 11, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • D0102C00006

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings