Pulmonary Vein Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Using Magnetic Navigation: Single Ring Versus Circumferential Techniques
Pulmonary Vein Ablation With Magnetic Navigation in Patients With Therapy-refractory Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation: Comparison of "Single Ring" and Circumferential Ablation Techniques
The single-ring ablation method aims for isolation of the posterior LA wall including the pulmonary veins. If avoiding ablation on the posterior LA wall esophageal injury is unlikely.
Aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an RMN-guided single-ring ablation method as compared to standard RMN-guided circumferential PVA.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Niedersachsen
-
Göttingen, Niedersachsen, Germany, 37075
- UMC Göttingen
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- drug refractory AF patients undergoing PVA
Exclusion Criteria:
- drug refractory AF patients undergoing repeat PVA
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: Circumferential ablation
|
Circumferential pulmonary vein ablation
|
|
Experimental: Single ring ablation
|
single ring pulmonary vein ablation
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Acute procedural success
Time Frame: After the end of the ablation procedure
|
number of PVs isolated at the end of the ablation procedure
|
After the end of the ablation procedure
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Long-term procedural success
Time Frame: 12 months
|
long-term freedom from any AT/AF episodes
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Markus Zabel, MD, Clinical Electrophysiology, University Medical Center Goettingen
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- STXS 10-005
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.