Inspiratory Muscular Training

June 12, 2012 updated by: Daniella Cunha Brandao, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

REGIONAL LUNG VENTILATION DISTRIBUTION AMONG INDIVIDUALS WITH CHRONIC HEART FAILURE AFTER AN INSPIRATORY MUSCLE TRAINING PROGRAMM: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL

Objectives: To evaluate regional lung ventilation distribution in patients suffering from chronic heart failure (CHF) after completing inspiratory muscle training (IMT) and correlate it with functional capacity and quality of life among these individuals. Methods and Results: Nineteen CHF patients were randomly assigned to two groups: Control and IMT. Before and after muscle training, subjects were submitted to assessment protocol for respiratory muscles, digital spirometry, optoelectronic plethysmography (OEP), the six-minute walk test (6MWT) and a quality of life questionnaire (MLHFQ). There was no difference in lung function following the 12-week training period in either group. However, the IMT group showed an increase in actual and predicted MIP, higher MLFHQ score and greater distance walked in the 6MWT, as well as a reduction in the Borg scale after the 6 MWT in relation to the control. For the OEP, IMT group members exhibited higher values for total chest wall volume (Vcw), abdominal rib cage volume (Vrc,a) and abdominal volume (Vab) when compared to the control. Conclusions: For patients with CHF, IMT proved efficient in improving muscle strength, functional capacity and quality of life. The present study also analyzed the distribution behavior of lung volumes for the thoracoabdominal system in this population, showing that larger abdominal rib cage and abdomen volumes may result in more effective diaphragmatic contraction.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
19

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Brazil
    • Pernambuco
      • Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil
        • Departamento de Fisioterapia-Universidade Federal de pernambuco

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • sedentary adults diagnosed with functional class II and II CHF in accordance with the New York Heart Association (NYHA);
  • in stage B or C according to American College of Sports Medicine guidelines;
  • with left ventricle ejection fraction lower than 45% (evaluated by echocardiogram in a period ≤ 1 year);
  • cardiomegaly confirmed by increased left ventricle end-diastolic (LVDD) and end-systolic diameter (LVESD) associated with a cardiac index (CI) >0.5 according to chest X-rays;
  • inspiratory muscle weakness (MIP <70% of predicted values);
  • clinical stability with no change in medication for at least three months and sedentary (no regular physical activity performed in the previous six months or not accumulating 30 minutes or more of moderate physical activity - 3 to 6 METs - on most week days).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients exhibiting unstable angina, myocardial infarction or prior heart surgery up to three months before beginning the investigation;
  • orthopedic, infectious or chronic metabolic diseases;
  • treatment with steroids, hormones or chemotherapy;
  • ratio between forced expiratory volume in one second and forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) < 70% of predicted, characterizing an obstructive respiratory disorder;
  • respiratory diseases, smokers and ex-smokers with a history of cigarettes/day for more than 10 years.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Inspiratory Muscle Training
Other: Inspiratory muscle training
All participants were instructed to use a Threshold® trainer for 30min a day, seven times a week over 12 consecutive weeks.10 Patients in the Control Group used a Threshold ® device without resistance, making them blind to the treatment. For the treatment group, inspiratory resistance of the Threshold® trainer was 30% of MIP, adjusted on a weekly basis to remain constant.
Placebo Comparator: Control group
Patients from the control group were also assessed weekly to ensure homogenization of the learning effect for the manometer maneuver.
Other: Control group
Patients from the control group were also assessed weekly to ensure homogenization of the learning effect for the manometer maneuver.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Respiratory muscles
Time Frame: 3 months
In order to evaluate inspiratory muscle strength, a digital manometer was used (MVD-300, Globalmed, Brazil) connected to a mouthpiece with a 2mm opening to reduce the influence of pressure caused by glottal closure. In a sitting position, each patient performed up to six maneuvers to obtain MIP, from residual volume (RV) to total functional capacity (TFC), considering the best of three maneuvers with < 10% variation between them
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of respiratory mechanics by Optoelectronic Plethysmography
Time Frame: 3 months
The optoelectronic plethysmography system (OEP) of BTS Bioengineering (Italy) was employed in this study. To that end, a calibration instrument was used, containing three axes connected to reflective markers. This phase does not require participation by the individual to be examined. This creates a three-dimensional model, dividing the thoracoabdominal system into three parts: pulmonary rib cage (RCp), abdominal rib cage (RCa) and the abdomen (AB).
3 months
Evaluation of submaximal functional capacity
Time Frame: 3 mounths
Functional capacity was assessed by the six-minute walk test (6MWT), according to the protocol published by the American Thoracic Society (ATS).
3 mounths
Quality of Life Questionnaire: Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ)
Time Frame: 3 months
The MLHFQ is a questionnaire validated for the Brazilian population, consisting of 21 questions regarding limitations frequently associated with the extent to which heart failure has affected patient's lives in the previous month. Each question is attributed a value from 0 (zero) to 5 (five), with the highest score indicating worse quality of life. The total score is calculated by adding the 21 items, with a possible interval between 0 and 105.
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Pernambuco

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 3, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 4, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 7, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 13, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 12, 2012

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • tese02

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings