Comparison of Preparation Regimens for Colonoscopy
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bucharest, Romania
- Colentina Clinical Hospital
-
Timisoara, Romania, 300783
- Spitalul clinic judetean
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- all patients undergoing colonoscopy
Exclusion Criteria:
- patient refusal to sign informed consent
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: sodium picosulphate and magnesium citrate (Picoprep)
|
Patients are randomized to receive one of the two different preparation regimens for colonoscopy usually employed in our unit, polyethylene glycol or sodium picosulphate and magnesium citrate
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: polyethylene glycol (Fortrans)
|
Patients are randomized to receive one of the two different preparation regimens for colonoscopy usually employed in our unit, polyethylene glycol or sodium picosulphate and magnesium citrate
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
colon preparation
Time Frame: 24 h
|
the impact of colon preparation as assessed by the endoscopist (scale from 1 to 4, 1 representing the worst and 4 the best prepared colon) on the quality of the endoscopic examination
|
24 h
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Manno M, Pigo F, Manta R, Barbera C, Bertani H, Mirante VG, Dabizzi E, Caruso A, Olivetti G, Hassan C, Zullo A, Conigliaro R. Bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution: optimizing the splitting regimen. Dig Liver Dis. 2012 Jul;44(7):576-9. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2012.02.012. Epub 2012 Mar 26.
- Voiosu T, Ratiu I, Voiosu A, Iordache T, Schipor A, Baicus C, Sporea I, Voiosu R. Time for individualized colonoscopy bowel-prep regimens? A randomized controlled trial comparing sodium picosulphate and magnesium citrate versus 4-liter split-dose polyethylene glycol. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2013 Jun;22(2):129-34.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- COL-GASTRO-2
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.