Evaluate Capsular Apposition to Intraocular Lens

January 7, 2015 updated by: yin ying zhao, Wenzhou Medical University

Phase 1 Evaluate Capsular Apposition to Intraocular Lens in Subjects With High Myopia by Ultra-long Scan Depth Optical Coherence Tomography; Phase 2 Evaluate Capsular Apposition to Different Types of Intraocular Lens in Subjects

In this study, the investigators examined the capsule-IOL interaction including anterior and posterior capsule adhesion, contact between posterior capsule and the posterior edge of intraocular lense (IOL), configuration of capsular bend and the incidence of posterior capsular opacity (PCO) between high myopia eyes and emmetropia eyes.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

150 eyes of 150 cataract patients scheduled for phacoemulsification surgery were recruited, of which 20 eyes were high myopia (AL > 26mm) and 40 eyes were emmetropia (22 < AL < 25mm) as control group.High myopia eyes and 20 emmetropia eyes were implanted with the single-piece hydrophobic acrylic IOL (Acrysof IQ SN60WF, Alcon laboratories, Inc. IQ group). Another 20 emmetropia eyes were implanted with the other single-piece hydrophilic acrylic IOL (Akreos Adapt, Bausch &Lomb, AO group).80 eyes implanted with the single-piece hydrophobic acrylic IOL were examined by SSOCT to build the 3-D model of anterior segment.

Methods: 60 eyes were examined by custom-built UL-OCT at 4 hours, 1 day, 7 day, 14 day, 28 day, 3 month, 6 month,12 month after surgery.30 eyes implanted with the single-piece hydrophobic acrylic IOL were recruited for evaluation of the SSOCT reliability.50 eyes were examined by SSOCT at 1 day, 7 day,1 month, 3 months,6 months,12 months after surgery.

Measures: Contact of the anterior and posterior lens capsule with the IOL optic surface was evaluated. Types of capsular bend were described at the last follow-up. The incidence of posterior capsular opacity (PCO) was evaluated.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
150

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Zhejiang
      • Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China, 325027
        • Recruiting
        • Wenzhou Medical University
        • Contact:
          • XIXIA DING, PHD
          • Phone Number: 86-057788068859

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

This prospective study consisted consecutive patients with high axial myopia (myopia group) and age-matched patients with normal axial length (control group). All eyes underwent uncomplicated phacoemulsification with a single-piece IOL (AcrySof, Alcon) implantation for cataract treatment.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Eyes with an AL of 26.00mm or more were recruited to the high myopia group.
  • Eyes with an AL of 22.00 to 25.00 mm were recruited to the emmetropia group.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Preoperative exclusion criteria included diabetes, history of ocular surgery or inflammation, pupils could not be dilated over 7mm after mydriasis,
  • patients who could not be available for follow-up.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
high myopia
high myopia (axial length>26mm)
emmetropia
emmetropia (22<axial length<25mm) as control group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Evaluate Capsular Apposition to Intraocular Lens in high myopia eyes and emmetropia eyes with different types of IOL
Time Frame: 4hour, 1day, 7day, 14day, 28day, 3month, 6month, 12month
4hour, 1day, 7day, 14day, 28day, 3month, 6month, 12month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Wenzhou Medical University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: yune zhao, MS, Wenzhou Medical University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 11, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 24, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 25, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 9, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 7, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • WZYXY-ZYY-OCT

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings