Examination of the Bronchoprotective Effect of Endothelin Receptor Blockade in Asthma

June 10, 2012 updated by: Mark Spears, University of Glasgow
The purpose of this study will be to determine if blockade of endothelin 1 signalling via endothelin receptor A using ambrisentan or dual blockade (A&B) via bosentan can provide protection against methacholine induced bronchoconstriction in asthma.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Endothelin 1 may have a role in the development of acute airway narrowing in asthma. Blockade of the endothelin system may thereby protect against airway narrowing. Two receptors exist for endothelin 1, Endothelin A & B. Both can be blocked by Bosentan, and the A receptor by ambrisentan. Both medications are currently in use for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. The investigators will endeavour to examine the potential role of endothelin 1 in the development of airway narrowing in asthma through blockade of the endothelin receptors A&B through the use of bosentan and ambrisentan.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
18

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United Kingdom
      • Glasgow, United Kingdom, G12 0YN
        • Asthma Research Unit, University of Glasgow

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Physician diagnosis of asthma confirmed objectively by airway hyperactivity to methacholine (as determined by a ≥ 20% drop in FEV at a methacholine dose of ≤ 8mg/ml after β-agonist withdrawal as per ATS guidelines)
  2. Age range 18-60 years
  3. FEV1 ≥ 60% predicted
  4. Duration of asthma > 6 months and on stable medication for 4 weeks
  5. Prescribed and compliant with inhaled corticosteroid up to a maximum of 2000mcg beclomethasone or equivalent
  6. No history of previous regular smoking and current non-smoker

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unstable asthma; defined as the presence of 1 or more of the following events in the month prior to study [Emergency/'out of hours' visit to GP for asthma exacerbation; GP visit to patient at home for asthma exacerbation or A & E/hospital admission for asthma exacerbation]
  2. Treatment with oral corticosteroids in the past month
  3. Need for maintenance oral corticosteroid therapy
  4. Pregnancy or planning to become pregnant over course of study and up to one month after

  5. Excessive risk of hepatotoxicity from endothelin receptor antagonists;

    • Alcohol excess (defined as regular consumption above government daily recommend limits; currently defined as 28 units per wk for men, 21 units per week for women)
    • Previous intravenous drug use
    • Current or known history of liver disease (with the exception of Gilberts disease and gallstones)
    • Chronic hepatitis (either viral (e.g. hepatitis B or C) or autoimmune)
    • Bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or asparate aminotransferase (AST) greater than the upper limit of normal at screening
  6. Anaemia (defined as haemoglobin below the lower reference range for sex) at screening
  7. Renal failure (defined as eGFR less than 50 mL/minute/1.73 m2) at screening
  8. Known HIV positivity
  9. History of inability to tolerate bosentan or ambrisentan
  10. Significant medical conditions other than asthma felt by investigator to preclude participation in study. This could be either in patients best interest or due to potential to significantly alter responses to medication and hence alter power of clinical trial (examples include; significant heart failure (NYHA grades II-IV), diabetes mellitus, bronchiectasis or haematological malignancy).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Drug: Placebo
bd for two weeks
Experimental: Ambrisentan
5mg od ambrisentan
Drug: Ambrisentan
5mg od two weeks
Other Names:
  • Volibris
Experimental: Bosentan
62.5mg bosentan
Drug: Bosentan
62.5mg bd two weeks
Other Names:
  • Tracleer

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in doubling dose of methacholine to produce bronchoconstriction compared to placebo
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Both active treatments will be compared against placebo with respect to protection against methacholine induced bronchoconstriction
2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Which of the endothelin receptors A&B are most bronchoprotective against methacholine
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Both bostentan and ambrisentans effect on airway response to methacholine will be compared to placebo. The relative efficacy will be compared, in terms of doubling doses of methacholine.
2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Glasgow

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Mark Spears, MBChB PhD, University of Glasgow

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2014

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 7, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 10, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 12, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 12, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 10, 2012

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • AR012

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings