Mobile Psychosocial Interventions for MMT Clients (MobileMMT)

September 13, 2017 updated by: National Development and Research Institutes, Inc.

Providing Psychosocial Interventions to Substance Abusers Via Mobile Technology

This study will develop and evaluate the preliminary efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a mobile phone-delivered psychosocial intervention for opioid-dependent adults (N=219) in methadone maintenance treatment (MMT). A three-arm, randomized clinical trial will evaluate the relative efficacy of: (1) standard MMT; (2) standard MMT plus the mobile intervention; and (3) a mobile-based control condition on the primary outcomes of treatment retention and opioid use (assessed via urine toxicology). If results are promising, this novel therapeutic tool may have a tremendous impact on improving access to and effectiveness of substance abuse treatment in a variety of other populations (and could also be adapted for an array of other behavioral health applications), while significantly limiting costs.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study will develop and implement a mobile technology-delivered psychosocial intervention for opioid-dependent adults in methadone maintenance treatment (MMT). This novel therapeutic system promises to be cost-effective and to enable the provision of flexible, on-demand therapeutic support outside of the formal treatment setting. The specific aims of this investigation are as follows: Aim 1: The investigators will develop a novel, interactive, evidence-based psychosocial intervention delivered via mobile phones, designed to promote skills acquisition and reduce illicit drug use. Specifically, our Mobile Therapeutic System (MTS) will offer key elements of a psychosocial intervention for substance use disorders of known efficacy (the Community Reinforcement Approach). Participants will be provided with unlimited daily prompts to encourage use of the program and will be able to access the application at any time and as much as they choose, within their natural environments. Our iterative development process will include input from focus groups with clients in methadone treatment (n=24), input from experts in the field, and feedback testing of a beta-version of the mobile phone-based program with clients in methadone treatment (n=30). Aim 2: The investigators will evaluate the efficacy of this mobile tool with participants entering MMT during the first three months of their treatment (n=219). The investigators will evaluate the relative preliminary efficacy of (1) standard treatment, (2) standard treatment plus MTS and (3) a mobile-based control condition on the primary outcomes of retention and opioid use (via urine toxicology) and secondary outcomes of other substance use (via urine toxicology and self-report), readiness to change drug use behavior, coping skills, opioid craving, HIV risk behavior, and psychosocial functioning during the 3-month intervention phase. Durability of effects will be examined at 1 and 3 month follow-ups. Aim 3: The investigators will perform an economic analysis of MTS in community-based MMT. The investigators will estimate the incremental costs and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of MTS relative to standard care and the mobile control group. The primary ICER will be the incremental costs per increased abstinence time (the clinical measure of effectiveness) and the secondary ICER will be incremental costs per increased quality adjusted life year (QALY) (the economic measure of effectiveness). Cost data will be vital to future translational projects to disseminate effective mobile interventions in community systems. If results are promising, this novel therapeutic tool may have a tremendous impact on improving access to and effectiveness of substance abuse treatment in a variety of other populations (and could also be adapted for an array of other behavioral health applications), while significantly limiting costs.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
219

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • Long Island City, New York, United States, 11101
        • Bridge Plaza Treatment and Rehabilitation Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • client enrolled in the study site's methadone maintenance program
  • within the first month of initiating methadone maintenance treatment
  • 18 years of age or older
  • sufficient English-language ability to participate in informed consent process, complete study assessments and understand the text in mobile phone- delivered interventions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • entering treatment at the study site with the intention of receiving a methadone-assisted withdrawal only
  • evidence of an active psychiatric disorder requiring immediate intervention (e.g., suicidality, psychosis)
  • evidence of significant mental illness that may preclude participation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: standard treatment
the standard drug counseling offered to patients in methadone maintenance treatment at the study site
Behavioral: standard treatment
the standard drug counseling offered to patients at the study site's methadone maintenance program
Experimental: Mobile Therapeutic System (MTS)
The Mobile Therapeutic System (MTS) is a novel, interactive, mobile phone-delivered psychosocial intervention designed to promote skills acquisition and reduce drug use among adults in methadone maintenance treatment
Behavioral: standard treatment
the standard drug counseling offered to patients at the study site's methadone maintenance program
Behavioral: MTS (Mobile Therapeutic System)
a novel, interactive, mobile phone-delivered psychosocial intervention designed to promote skills acquisition and reduce drug use among adults in methadone maintenance treatment
Active Comparator: mobile control
a mobile phone-based application that directs participants to the NIDA website's home page
Behavioral: standard treatment
the standard drug counseling offered to patients at the study site's methadone maintenance program
Behavioral: mobile control
a mobile phone-based application that directs participants to the NIDA website's homepage

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
treatment retention
Time Frame: 6 months
participants' retention in methadone maintenance treatment (MMT)
6 months
opioid use
Time Frame: 6 months
participants' illicit use of opioids, as measured by urine toxicology and self-report (self-report data collected via the timeline follow-back calendar assessment [TLFB])
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
other substance use
Time Frame: 6 months
participants' use of alcohol and drugs, as measured by urine toxicology and self-report (self-report data collected via the timeline follow-back calendar assessment [TLFB])
6 months
coping skills
Time Frame: 6 months
participants' coping skills as measured by the Coping Strategies Scale (CSS)
6 months
readiness to change drug use
Time Frame: 6 months
participants' readiness to change drug use, as measured by the Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale (SOCRATES)
6 months
heroin/opioid craving
Time Frame: 6 months
participants' craving for heroin and/or other opioids, as measured by the Heroin/Opiate Craving Questionnaire (HCQ)
6 months
HIV risk behavior
Time Frame: 6 months
participants' HIV risk behavior as measured by the High Risk-Taking Behavior Scale (HRBS)
6 months
psychiatric and psychosocial functioning
Time Frame: 6 months
participants' level of psychiatric functioning (as assessed by the Brief Symptom Inventory [BSI]) and psychosocial functioning (as assessed by the Addiction Severity Index [ASI])
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
National Development and Research Institutes, Inc.

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Michelle Acosta, Ph.D., National Development and Research Institutes (NDRI)
  • Principal Investigator: Lisa A. Marsch, Ph.D., Dartmouth College
  • Study Director: Honoria Guarino, Ph.D., National Development and Research Institutes (NDRI)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 29, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 3, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 4, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 14, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 13, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Mobile631
  • R01DA029630 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings