A Study of Erwinaze Administered Intravenously in Patients Who Had an Allergy to Frontline Asparaginase Therapy

June 1, 2021 updated by: Jazz Pharmaceuticals

Phase II, An Open Label, Single Arm, Multi-Center Pharmacokinetic Study of Intravenous Erwinaze (Asparaginase Erwinia Chrysanthemi)Following Allergy to Native E. Coli Asparaginase (Elspar or Kidrolase), Pegaspargase (Oncaspar) or Calaspargase Pegol (EZN-2285) in Children, Adolescents and Young Adults With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) or Lymphoblastic Lymphoma.

This study will utilize Erwinaze via intravenous administration in patients between the ages of 1 and 30 who have experienced an allergy to their frontline therapy. The study will determine the proportion of patients with 2 day nadir serum asparaginase activity levels that are >0.1 IU/mL during the first 2 weeks of treatment with 3 times per week IV dosing.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S4R1
        • McMasters University Medical Center
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, m561X8
        • Sick Children's Hospital
    • Quebec
      • Saint Catherine, Quebec, Canada, H3T1CS
        • Hospital St. Justine
      • Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada, CIV462
        • Quebec Children's Hospital
  • United States
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90027
        • Children's Hospital of Los Angeles
      • Orange County, California, United States, 92868
        • Children's Hospital of Orange County
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304
        • Stanford Medical Center
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • Children's Hospital
    • Florida
      • Saint Petersburg, Florida, United States, 33701
        • All Children's Hospital
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Children's Memorial Hospital
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21231
        • John Hopkins
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Dana Farber Cancer Institute
    • Michigan
      • Minneapolis, Michigan, United States, 55455
        • University of Minnesota
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55406
        • Children's Hospital and Clinics of Minnesota
    • New Jersey
      • New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States, 08903
        • UMDNJ/Robert Wood Johnson
    • New York
      • Bronx, New York, United States, 10467
        • Montifiore Medical Center
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • Oregon Health & Sciences
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15224
        • Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Texas Children's Hospital
    • Virginia
      • Falls Church, Virginia, United States, 22042
        • Inova Fairfax Medical Center
    • Wisconsin
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53226
        • Children's Hospital of Wisconsin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 30 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) or Lymphoblastic Lymphoma,
  • Ages >/= 1 and </= to 30 years at the time of initial diagnosis
  • Undergoing asparaginase treatment for ALL or lymphoblastic lymphoma
  • Documented Grade 2 or higher hypersensitivity reaction to native or pegylated E. coli asparaginase or Calaspargase pegol
  • Must have two remaining weeks of native E. coli asparaginase treatment or 1 remaining dose of either Pegaspargase or Calaspargase pegol
  • Direct bilirubin less than or equal to Grade 2
  • Amylase and lipase within normal limits (per institutional standards)
  • Signed informed consent by the patient is greater than or equal to 18 years or by the parent if the patient is younger than 18 years old.

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Open-Label Erwinaze
Drug: asparaginase Erwinia chrysanthemi

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Two Day Nadir Serum Asparaginase Activity (NSAA) Level
Time Frame: 48 hours post-dose 5
To report the mean 2 day NSAA levels (48 hour levels taken after the 5th dose) that are > or = 0.1 IU/mL during the first 2 weeks of treatment with 3-times per week intravenous dosing of Erwinase at 25,000 IU/m2/dose.
48 hours post-dose 5

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Participants Achieving Sustained NSAA Values of >0.1 U/mL at 48 Hours
Time Frame: 48 hours post-dose 5
To report the proportion of participants achieving 2 day NSAA levels (48 hour levels taken after the 5th dose) that are > or = 0.1 IU/mL during the first 2 weeks of treatment with 3-times per week intravenous dosing of Erwinase at 25,000 IU/m2/dose.
48 hours post-dose 5
Three Day NSAA Level
Time Frame: 72 hours post-dose 6
To report the mean 3 day NSAA levels (72 hour levels taken after the 6th dose) that are > or = 0.1 IU/mL in the first 2 weeks of treatment with 3 times per week intravenous dosing of Erwinase at 25,000 IU/m2/dose.
72 hours post-dose 6
Proportion of Participants Achieving Sustained NSAA Values of >0.1 U/mL at 72 Hours
Time Frame: 72 hours post-dose 6
To report the proportion of participants achieving 3 day NSAA levels (72 hour levels taken after the 6th dose) that are > or = 0.1 IU/mL in the first 2 weeks of treatment with 3 times per week intravenous dosing of Erwinase at 25,000 IU/m2/dose.
72 hours post-dose 6
Nadir Serum Asparaginase Activity Over Time
Time Frame: 4 weeks to 30 weeks
To describe the NSAA over time in participants with ALL/Lymphoblastic Lymphoma who have/had developed hypersensitivity to native E. coli asparaginase, Pegaspargase or Calaspargase pegol and are receiving intravenous Erwinaze 3 times per week for a prolonged duration (4-30 weeks).
4 weeks to 30 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Jazz Pharmaceuticals

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Lynda Vrooman, MD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 25, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 16, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 18, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 23, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 1, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 100EUSA12

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings