INSORB Versus Subcuticular Sutures at Cesarean Section
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Skin Closure at Cesarean Section: INSORB Absorbable Staples Versus Subcuticular Sutures
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The proposed study is a randomized controlled trial with two arms. All patients admitted to Labor and Delivery at Johns Hopkins Hospital for delivery will be approached and offered entry into our study during the routine consent process which includes consent for cesarean section that occurs with each patient. Once the patient is enrolled, and if she undergoes a cesarean section, the patient will be randomized at time of cesarean section to receive skin closure by either the INSORB™ absorbable staples or subcuticular closure using Biosyn™ suture as is the standard practice. The size of the suture (3-0 vs. 4-0) and type of needle used to sew is at the discretion of the surgeon. The indications for and performance of the cesarean section will remain standard care by the Obstetrical team and the patient's participation in this study will have no impact whatsoever on the obstetrical course of the patient. The only additional procedure that will be asked of the obstetrical team performing the cesarean section is to measure and close the subcutaneous tissue if the depth from the skin edge to the transversalis fascia is greater than 2cm as this has been shown to decrease subsequent seroma formation and wound disruption. The dressing will be standardized as follows: a folded abdominal (ABD) pad will be placed in a sterile fashion directly over the incision and foam tape will be applied to provide a "pressure dressing." The dressing will be removed on post-operative day #2.
The patient's postoperative course will remain unchanged and her discharge will be at the discretion of her obstetrical providers. On post-operative day #3, a picture of the incision will be taken with the patient's identifying number adjacent to the picture and the patient will be asked to complete a brief survey asking about post-operative pain and scars (see included PSAS survey). The patients will follow-up with her Obstetrician for her normal post-partum visit where another picture of the incision will be taken. Both an observer scar assessment score (OSAS) and patient scar assessment score (PSAS) will be obtained during this visit. The patient will then be contacted by telephone by a study member 3 months after her surgery for a brief survey (same PSAS survey) assessing her satisfaction with the resulting scar. At this point, the patient's participation in the study will end.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 20794
- Johns Hopkins Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- cesarean section via transverse skin incision informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- vertical skin incision
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Sutures
|
placement of absorbable sutures at cesarean section
|
|
Active Comparator: Insorb Staples
|
Placement of Insorb absorbable staples at cesarean section
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Pain Scale
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Visual Analog Score 0-10, with 0 being painless and 10 being the most severe
|
3 months
|
|
Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
assessed using the Objective scar scale score, score range 6-60 with 6 being the best score, representing normal skin and 60 being the worst score representing scar very different from the normal skin.
|
6 weeks
|
|
Closure Time
Time Frame: up to 20 minutes post intervention
|
Number of minutes taken to close post cesarean section
|
up to 20 minutes post intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Gottardi A, Cherubino M, Uccella S, Valdatta L. Cosmetic outcomes of various skin closure methods following cesarean delivery: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jul;203(1):36.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.001. Epub 2010 Apr 24.
- Menacker F, Hamilton BE. Recent trends in cesarean delivery in the United States. NCHS Data Brief. 2010 Mar;(35):1-8.
- Chelmow D, Rodriguez EJ, Sabatini MM. Suture closure of subcutaneous fat and wound disruption after cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2004 May;103(5 Pt 1):974-80. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000124807.76451.47.
- Basha SL, Rochon ML, Quinones JN, Coassolo KM, Rust OA, Smulian JC. Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Sep;203(3):285.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.07.011.
- Gaertner I, Burkhardt T, Beinder E. Scar appearance of different skin and subcutaneous tissue closure techniques in caesarean section: a randomized study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 May;138(1):29-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.07.003. Epub 2007 Sep 6.
- Couto RC, Pedrosa TM, Nogueira JM, Gomes DL, Neto MF, Rezende NA. Post-discharge surveillance and infection rates in obstetric patients. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1998 Jun;61(3):227-31. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(98)00047-2.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- NA_00043795
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pregnancy
-
NCT03064594Completed
-
NCT03403543UnknownPregnancy | Pregnancy Related | Infant | Pregnancy Disease | Risk Factor
-
NCT07624903Not yet recruiting
-
NCT07541937Recruiting
-
NCT07186127Recruiting
-
NCT07358026RecruitingHealthy | Pregnancy | Early Pregnancy | Early Pregnancy Loss | Childbirth
-
NCT04400149Not yet recruitingPregnancy Complications | Pregnancy Loss | Pregnancy Preterm
-
NCT00244738CompletedProlonged Pregnancy
-
NCT04117308Completed
-
NCT06426979Completed
Clinical Trials on Absorbable sutures
-
NCT07498361RecruitingThird Molar Surgery | Poly(Lactide-co-glycolide) Sutures | Suture Resorption
-
NCT03407820CompletedGanglion Cysts | Carpal Tunnel Syndrome | Trigger Finger | Dupuytren Contracture | All Minor Hand Surgery Including | De Quervain Syndrome
-
NCT06845735RecruitingHip Arthroscopy | Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome | Labrum Injury of the Hip Joint
-
NCT00223132CompletedSkin Laxity of Abdomen, Thighs, Chest, Back, and Neck
-
NCT00223119TerminatedPerineal Laceration Repair
-
NCT00522860CompletedTrachoma | Trachomatous Trichiasis
-
NCT05981443CompletedSurgical Wound | Brow Ptosis
-
NCT00681070Completed