Contingency Outcomes in Prolonged Exposure (COPE)

August 30, 2016 updated by: Jessica Peirce, Johns Hopkins University

Incentivizing Adherence to Prolonged Exposure With Substance Users

The aim of this research is to assess whether Contingency Management is effective in improving treatment adherence in substance use disordered (SUD) patients with comorbid PTSD. Although Prolonged Exposure therapy (PE) is the gold standard treatment for PTSD, the few studies of this treatment in substance users have shown poor adherence. Contingency Management is a well-established approach that could be used to enhance adherence to PE. From a consented sample of 125 opioid-dependent and methadone-treated patients at Addiction Treatment Services, an intent-to-treat sample of 62 patients with co-occurring current PTSD will be offered PE. Half of the 62 participants will be randomly assigned to a Prolonged Exposure with Contingency Management (PE+CM) condition that provides monetary-based incentives for attending the PE therapy sessions. The comparison condition will be assigned to a Prolonged Exposure (PE) condition without the attendance incentives intervention. The PE sessions will be scheduled once per week for 12 weeks, with a 12-week follow-up. Groups will be compared primarily on adherence to the PE schedule, improvement in PTSD symptoms, and rates of drug use (urine specimens, self-reported use). The study's three primary aims are to 1) Evaluate the efficacy of adding voucher-based attendance incentives to PE for PTSD to increase adherence in SUD patients in a methadone treatment program; 2) Evaluate the efficacy of adding voucher-based attendance incentives to PE for PTSD to reduce PTSD symptoms in SUD patients; and 3) Evaluate the effect of PE for PTSD on rates of drug use in SUD patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
126

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21224
        • Addiction Treatment Services

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria for Phase I (evaluation):

  • positive screen for PTSD, as determined by score on the MPSS-R
  • methadone maintenance for at least 4 weeks (to help ensure initial stabilization on methadone)
  • at least 18 years of age

Inclusion criteria for Phase 2 (treatment):

  • confirmation of current PTSD based on the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale
  • no psychiatric contraindications to PE (e.g., current suicidal/homicidal intent)
  • clear memory for the traumatic event (e.g., flashbacks or re-experiencing the event)
  • interest in receiving PE
  • agree to sign release of information for any current psychiatric treatment providers outside of ATS
  • agree to delay taking daily methadone dose on exposure therapy days until after session
  • no history of prior exposure-based therapy for PTSD
  • agree to audiotaping of therapy sessions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy
  • acute medical problem that requires immediate and intense medical management (e.g., AIDS defining illness; active tuberculosis)
  • presence of a formal thought disorder, delusions, hallucinations, or imminent risk of harm to self or others

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Reinforced Prolonged Exposure (RPE)
All participants will be scheduled to attend a weekly Prolonged Exposure therapy session for 12 consecutive weeks, and followed for 12 additional weeks. RPE participants will receive voucher-based reinforcement contingent on attendance to scheduled Prolonged Exposure therapy sessions.
Behavioral: Prolonged Exposure Therapy
Prolonged Exposure Therapy is considered the "gold standard" treatment for PTSD in psychiatry. It uses a cognitive-behavioral approach that repeatedly and systematically exposes patients to memories of their traumatic events to reduce fear and arousal. The PE therapy offered in this study will be based on procedures used by Foa and colleagues, described in their book-length treatment manual (Foa, Hembree, & Rothbaum, 2007).
Other Names:
  • PE Therapy
Behavioral: Voucher-Based Reinforcement
Those in the PE+CM condition will also be able to earn voucher-based incentives for each therapy session that they attend as scheduled, with a maximum of $480 for full adherence to all sessions. Specifically, participants will earn $30 for attending Session 1, $40 for attending Session 2, $50 for attending Session 3, and $60 for attending Sessions 4 through 9. There will be no payment for Sessions 10 through 12. Because it is very important that participants attend sessions on schedule, voucher values will be reset starting from $30 if participants miss a scheduled session. Vouchers can be exchanged for goods and services in the community (e.g., gift cards to local retailers).
Other Names:
  • Vouchers
Active Comparator: Standard Prolonged Exposure (SPE)
All participants will be scheduled to attend a weekly Prolonged Exposure therapy session for 12 consecutive weeks, and followed for 12 additional weeks.
Behavioral: Prolonged Exposure Therapy
Prolonged Exposure Therapy is considered the "gold standard" treatment for PTSD in psychiatry. It uses a cognitive-behavioral approach that repeatedly and systematically exposes patients to memories of their traumatic events to reduce fear and arousal. The PE therapy offered in this study will be based on procedures used by Foa and colleagues, described in their book-length treatment manual (Foa, Hembree, & Rothbaum, 2007).
Other Names:
  • PE Therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prolonged Exposure session attendance
Time Frame: 12 weeks
PE session attendance will be measured as the percent of participants completing a full course of PE and as a repeating dichotomous variable (weekly assessments of attended vs. unattended sessions).
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PTSD symptoms
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Groups will be compared on PTSD symptoms (as measured by CAPS scores) collected at each assessment timepoint (baseline, week 6, week 12, week 24)
24 weeks
Drug use
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Groups will be compared on weekly drug test results (presence/absence of drug) and on self-reported number of days using each drug during the 12-week treatment phase.
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Johns Hopkins University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jessica Peirce, Ph.D., Johns Hopkins University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 21, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 24, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 26, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 31, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 30, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1R34DA032689-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings