Cognitive Remediation Therapy (CRT) in Adolescents With EOS

August 9, 2018 updated by: Olga Puig, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

Efficacy of a Cognitive Remediation Treatment in Adolescents With Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders

Cognitive Remediation Therapy (CRT) can enhance cognitive performance in schizophrenia improving functional outcome. But most of the studies have involved participants who are in average in their mid 30s, and little is known about the efficacy of CRT in adolescents with early-onset schizophrenia (EOS). The aim of this study is to investigate efficacy of CRT in improving cognitive performance and functional outcome in adolescents with EOS. We expect to find that CRT improves cognitive and functional outcomes in adolescents with schizophrenia.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Early-onset schizophrenia (EOS) is associated with worse course and poor outcome than adulthood schizophrenia. Cognitive deficits are known to be a core feature in EOS, with large deficits on almost all cognitive domains. Importantly, cognitive deficits are known to be strong predictors of psychosocial and functional outcomes in schizophrenia and also in the early-onset form of the illness. Cognitive Remediation Therapy (CRT) is a behavioral training based intervention that aims to improve cognitive processes (attention, memory, executive function, social cognition or metacognition) with the goal of durability and generalization. It has been demonstrated that CRT improve cognitive deficits and functional outcome in adult patients but there are very few studies with adolescent samples.

A controlled randomized study will be carry out with two groups: patients receiving treatment as usual plus CRT, and patients receiving treatment as usual (TAU). The independent variable is the cognitive remediation treatment. The CRT will be applied according to the manual of Wykes and Reeder (2005). The program has a duration of 40 sessions, with two session for week. It is carried out individually and utilizes paper and pencil tasks. The main technique utilized is the scaffolding in a context of learning without errors.

The main dependent variable is the cognitive performance measured through neuropsychological tests. Other secondary dependent variables are functional outcome and clinical symptoms obtained from the psychometric evaluation.

All participants will be evaluated before and after the experimental intervention in several neurocognitive domains, clinical symptoms and functional outcome. The evaluations will be carried out by expert evaluators. Intention-to-treat analysis will be carry out using the statistical package SPSS v 18.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Spain
    • Catalunya
      • Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain, 08036
        • Department of Child and Adolescent Pyshicatry and Psychology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age between 12 and 18 years
  • a DSM-IV-TR schizophrenia-type disorder (schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder), with onset before the age of 17
  • being clinically and pharmacologically stabilized during the last 6 weeks before the baseline assessment
  • the estimation of not modifying pharmacological antipsychotic treatment
  • presence of cognitive deficit confirmed by the neuropsychological battery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • IQ below 70
  • presence of an active misuse disorder
  • presence of organic brain syndromes or neurological disorders
  • having received electroconvulsive therapy in the previous 6 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Cognitive Remediation Therapy
CRT: Frontal/Executive Program. The program has a duration of 40 sessions, with two session for week. Is is carried out individually and utilizes paper and pencil tasks. The main technique utilized is the scaffolding in a context of learning without errors.
Behavioral: Cognitive Remediation Therapy
Other Names:
  • Cognitive training
  • Cognitive enhancement

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cognitive performance
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Change from baseline in neuropsychological test scores of memory, executive functions, working memory and processing speed at post-treatment evaluation
20 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional outcome
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Change in real-world functioning scales, self-esteem and caregiver burden at post-treatment evaluation
20 weeks
Symptoms
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Change from baseline in measures of clinical symptoms at post-treatment evaluation
20 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Olga Puig, PhD, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
  • Study Director: Rafael Penadés, PhD, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
  • Study Director: Josefina Castro-Fornieles, MD, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 3, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 3, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 5, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 13, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 9, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PI07/90054
  • ETES07/90054 (Other Grant/Funding Number: ISCIII)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Schizophrenia

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Remediation Therapy

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings