Reduced Intra-operative Blood Loss in Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic or Peri-ampullary Tumors; Monocentric Trial on Standard Open Versus Minimally Invasive Surgery

September 16, 2013 updated by: Baki Topal

Reduced Intra-operative Blood Loss in Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic or Peri-ampullary Tumors; Monocentric Randomized Trial on Standard Open Versus Minimally Invasive Surgery

The incidence of complications after standard open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or peri-ampullary tumours is around 50%. The amount of intra-operative blood loss is an important factor that determines the occurrence of postoperative complications. Therefore, any significant reduction of intra-operative blood loss will benefit the peri-operative course.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the only therapeutic option to cure patients suffering from pancreatic head or peri-ampullary tumors. The standard approach in PD is open surgery (OPD). With advancing technology, data from expert centers suggest minimally invasive or laparoscopic PD (LPD) to be safe and feasible, though randomized studies are lacking to show the clinical benefits of LPD vs. OPD.

Advantages of minimally invasive surgery over open surgery are reduced tissue damage, surgical trauma and immunosuppression.

The general objective of this study is to compare the intra-operative efficacy of LPD vs. OPD, and in particular the amount of intra-operative blood loss.

Study design Monocentric randomized trial to compare the amount of intra-operative blood loss in LPD vs. OPD. Patients expected to undergo portal vein resection/reconstruction or any simultaneous other type of surgery will be excluded from the study.

Two experienced surgeons will perform all procedures; RA will perform the open and BT the laparoscopic procedures. A pylorus-resecting PD will be followed by a trans-mesocolic end-to-side hepatico-jejunostomy (HJS), a pancreatico-gastrostomy (PGS), and an ante-colic gastro-enterostomy (GES). Da Vinci robotic assistance of the reconstruction in LPD is allowed for the HJS and the PGS, while the GES will be done with endo-staplers.

Statistical considerations Randomization will take place pre-operatively after informed consent has been obtained. Patients will be randomized into two groups (OPD vs. LPD) using permuted blocks of size 6. This implies that of each series of 6 consecutive patients, three patients will be randomized in each group. There are no stratification variables.

Monocentric randomized trial to compare the amount of intra-operative blood loss in LPD vs. OPD. Patients expected to undergo portal vein resection/reconstruction or any simultaneous other type of surgery will be excluded from the study.

Reference intra-operative blood loss levels are available from 138 patients (June 2009 - June 2012), without portal vein resection and without additional surgery. Analysis of these data reveals that these values follow a lognormal distribution; the log-transformed blood loss has a normal distribution with mean and standard deviation equal to 6.06 and 0.83, respectively. The corresponding geometric mean equals 427ml. Based on this distribution, 42.4%, 24.7% and 15.1% of the subjects are expected to have blood loss higher than 500, 750 and 1000 ml, respectively. It is assumed that the treatment (LPD) will lead to a 50% reduction of the (geometric) mean. The impact of this assumption on the distribution of the blood loss levels implies that 15.1%, 6.4% and 3.1% of the subjects in the LPD-group are expected to have a blood loss level higher than 500, 750 and 1000 ml, respectively.

Based on a two-sided two-sample pooled t-test of a mean ratio with lognormal data, a total of 50 subjects is needed to detect a two-fold reduction in blood loss (with alpha set at 5%) with 90% power.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Belgium
    • Vlaams-Brabant
      • Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium, 3000
        • University Hospitals Leuven

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients suffering from pancreatic or peri-ampullary tumour

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients, male or female, who undergo PD for a pancreatic or peri-ampullary tumor
  • Age between 18 to 80 years
  • Patients with and without pre-operative biliary drainage (for obstructive jaundice)
  • Pre-operative radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or biological is allowed
  • PD for IPMN is allowed

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Planned concomitant surgical procedures such as simultaneous colonic resection etc.
  • Expected/planned reconstruction of the portal vein or superior mesenteric vein
  • Any arterial reconstruction at the time of surgery
  • Age < 18years
  • Pregnancy
  • PD for chronic pancreatitis
  • PD for pancreatic trauma
  • PD for post-ERCP complications

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
OPD
standard open pancreaticoduodenectomy
LPD
laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
intra-operative blood loss
Time Frame: day 0 (at the end of surgery)
the amount of intra-operative blood loss (ml) at the end of surgery (d0)
day 0 (at the end of surgery)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Surgical resection margin
Time Frame: day 30
Histopathological examination of surgical resection margins of the resection specimen; done within 30 days after surgery pR0: tumour-free resection margins pR1: tumour involvement of surgical resection margins
day 30
length of hospital stay after surgery
Time Frame: day 30; 60; 90; 180
discharge from hospital after surgery
day 30; 60; 90; 180
hospital costs
Time Frame: year 1 & 2
final cost analysis
year 1 & 2

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Baki Topal

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Baki Topal, MD, PhD, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2014

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 18, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 23, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 24, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 17, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 16, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • LPD

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgery

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings