Decisionmaking for Abnormal Uterine Bleeding (AUB)
Decision Making Among Treatment Alternatives for Abnormal Uterine Bleeding (AUB)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
- Indiana University
-
-
North Carolina
-
Southern Pines, North Carolina, United States, 28388
- Southern Pines Women's Health Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Have received a diagnosis of dysfunctional or abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) that is recommended for treatment
- Have not yet selected or initiated treatment for current AUB diagnosis
- Be at least 18 years of age.
- Be possible candidates for either medical or surgical therapy
- Able to provide informed consent for treatment options for oneself
Exclusion Criteria:
- Are currently being treated for cancer
- Any cancer diagnosis within the past 2 years (other than non-melanoma skin cancer)
- AUB due to serious pelvic pathology, medications, pregnancy or systemic disease that limits their range of treatment options
- Are not recommended for surgical intervention
- Are not recommended for medical intervention
- Are under 18 years of age
- Have not received a diagnosis of AUB
- Are currently being treated for AUB
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Adaptive Conjoint Analysis
Computerized survey to elicit preferences
|
Computerized survey to elicit patient preferences
|
|
No Intervention: Usual care
Patients are counseled by their physician as usual
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Differences in patient-reported satisfaction between treatment groups
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
Satisfaction with care as measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Treatment Satisfaction-Patient Scale (FACT-TS-PS)
|
6 weeks
|
|
Differences in decision regret between treatment groups
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
Decision regret is measured by the Decision Regret Scale
|
6 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Lisa M Hess, PhD, Indiana University
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1009001853 (0904-66B)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.