Vaccine Acceptance in Pregnant Minority Women
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Georgia
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30308
- Emory University Hospital Midtown
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30303
- Grady Health System
-
Decatur, Georgia, United States, 30033
- Dourron OB/Gyn Associates Clinic
-
Riverdale, Georgia, United States, 30274
- New Millenium Obstetrics & Gynecology
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant, expecting delivery between August 31, 2012 and June 30, 2013
- Between the ages of 18-50 years old
- Black/African American
Exclusion Criteria:
- Have received the influenza or Tdap vaccine during the current pregnancy
- Already enrolled in the study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: High Elaboration Video Arm
Women randomized to this arm will be exposed to a handheld/electronic tablet device-based video with detailed vaccine-related information designed to invoke a high level of attention to the message and thought (elaboration) while processing information.
|
It is assumed that the women will also receive vaccine education materials from the OB/GYN practices as part of routine care.
The intervention for all three arms will be conducted during routine prenatal office visits.
Participants will complete a baseline questionnaire to assess attitudes regarding vaccination and will then be randomized to one of three enrollment arms and will be exposed to an intervention designed to take no longer than 20 minutes, so that patients can complete it during the time they are waiting to be seen.
While participants are completing the handheld/electronic tablet device-based intervention, the study recruiter will observe them and document dose exposure to the messages being presented.
The enrolled women will be contacted a month after the expected date of delivery and a follow up interview will be conducted to ascertain their vaccination status for receipt of influenza vaccine in pregnancy and Tdap during pregnancy or immediately post-partum.
|
|
Experimental: High Elaboration Interactive Tutorial Arm
Women will be exposed to a handheld/electronic tablet device-based intervention designed to invoke a high level of attention to the message and thought (elaboration) while processing information through an interactive question/answer format.
|
It is assumed that the women will also receive vaccine education materials from the OB/GYN practices as part of routine care.
The intervention for all three arms will be conducted during routine prenatal office visits.
Participants will complete a baseline questionnaire to assess attitudes regarding vaccination and will then be randomized to one of three enrollment arms and will be exposed to an intervention designed to take no longer than 20 minutes, so that patients can complete it during the time they are waiting to be seen.
While participants are completing the handheld/electronic tablet device-based intervention, the study recruiter will observe them and document dose exposure to the messages being presented.
The enrolled women will be contacted a month after the expected date of delivery and a follow up interview will be conducted to ascertain their vaccination status for receipt of influenza vaccine in pregnancy and Tdap during pregnancy or immediately post-partum.
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Low Elaboration / Control Arm
Women randomized to the control arm will be provided standard CDC vaccine information statements that will likely lead to low elaboration information processing.
|
It is assumed that the women will also receive vaccine education materials from the OB/GYN practices as part of routine care.
The intervention for all three arms will be conducted during routine prenatal office visits.
Participants will complete a baseline questionnaire to assess attitudes regarding vaccination and will then be randomized to one of three enrollment arms and will be exposed to an intervention designed to take no longer than 20 minutes, so that patients can complete it during the time they are waiting to be seen.
While participants are completing the handheld/electronic tablet device-based intervention, the study recruiter will observe them and document dose exposure to the messages being presented.
The enrolled women will be contacted a month after the expected date of delivery and a follow up interview will be conducted to ascertain their vaccination status for receipt of influenza vaccine in pregnancy and Tdap during pregnancy or immediately post-partum.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Influenza vaccination rates in pregnancy
Time Frame: Baseline and one month after participant's expected date of delivery
|
Data on vaccination status will be collected from participants enrolled in the main phase of the study during follow up starting one month after the expected date of delivery.
We will contact healthcare providers to obtain vaccination records for those who provide written consent to release their immunization records.
|
Baseline and one month after participant's expected date of delivery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Tdap vaccination rates in pregnancy
Time Frame: Baseline and one month after participant's expected date of delivery
|
Data on vaccination status will be collected from participants enrolled in the main phase of the study during follow up starting one month after the expected date of delivery.
We will contact healthcare providers to obtain vaccination records for those who provide written consent to release their immunization records.
|
Baseline and one month after participant's expected date of delivery
|
|
Change in attitudes regarding vaccination
Time Frame: Baseline and one month after the expected date of delivery
|
Data on attitudes regarding vaccination status will be collected from participants enrolled in the main phase of the study during follow up starting one month after the expected date of delivery.
|
Baseline and one month after the expected date of delivery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Saad B Omer, PhD, Emory University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Gust D, Brown C, Sheedy K, Hibbs B, Weaver D, Nowak G. Immunization attitudes and beliefs among parents: beyond a dichotomous perspective. Am J Health Behav. 2005 Jan-Feb;29(1):81-92. doi: 10.5993/ajhb.29.1.7.
- Gust DA, Kennedy A, Wolfe S, Sheedy K, Nguyen C, Campbell S. Developing tailored immunization materials for concerned mothers. Health Educ Res. 2008 Jun;23(3):499-511. doi: 10.1093/her/cym065. Epub 2007 Oct 23.
- Paulussen TG, Hoekstra F, Lanting CI, Buijs GB, Hirasing RA. Determinants of Dutch parents' decisions to vaccinate their child. Vaccine. 2006 Jan 30;24(5):644-51. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.08.053. Epub 2005 Aug 26.
- Wilson BJ. Designing media messages about health and nutrition: what strategies are most effective? J Nutr Educ Behav. 2007 Mar-Apr;39(2 Suppl):S13-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2006.09.001.
- Baxter CE, Barata PC. The paradox of HPV vaccines: how to reach sexually inexperienced women for protection against a sexually transmitted infection. Womens Health Issues. 2011 May-Jun;21(3):239-45. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2010.11.007. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
- Petty R, Cacioppo J. Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1986.
- Vannice KS, Salmon DA, Shui I, Omer SB, Kissner J, Edwards KM, Sparks R, Dekker CL, Klein NP, Gust DA. Attitudes and beliefs of parents concerned about vaccines: impact of timing of immunization information. Pediatrics. 2011 May;127 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S120-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-1722R. Epub 2011 Apr 18.
- Kriss JL, Frew PM, Cortes M, Malik FA, Chamberlain AT, Seib K, Flowers L, Ault KA, Howards PP, Orenstein WA, Omer SB. Evaluation of two vaccine education interventions to improve pertussis vaccination among pregnant African American women: A randomized controlled trial. Vaccine. 2017 Mar 13;35(11):1551-1558. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.01.037. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB00057339
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.