COmparison of Xience PrimE Versus REsolute Integrity in Diabetes or Small Vessel Disease (COPERES)

December 18, 2012 updated by: Lae Young Jung, Chonbuk National University Hospital

Study for Investigate the Effectiveness and Safety of Resolute Integrity or Xience Prime in Diabetes or Small Vessels Lesion Patients

The newer generation ZES (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, Resolute Integrity) and EES (Abbott Vascular, Abbott Park, Illinois, Xience Prime) were introduced to South Korea. Although these are thought to be superior in effect and stability compared to ZES and EES of previous generation, there are few clinical data regarding the high risk groups of diabetes patients or small vessels lesion. Moreover, looking at the 8.3% of restenosis in Resolute All Comer study (23% diabetes), the investigators could not know the outcome in high risk patients such as diabetes or small vessels lesion. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness and safety of Resolute Integrity or Xience Prime in diabetes or small vessels lesion patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
600

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Korea, Republic of
    • Chon-buk
      • Jeon-Ju, Chon-buk, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Devision of cardiology, Chonbuk national university hospital
        • Contact:
          • Lae young Jung, fellow
          • Phone Number: 82-63-250-2204
          • Email: young@naver.com

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age > 18 years
  2. Patients requiring stent procedure (visual diameter stenosis ≥ 50%)
  3. Stable angina with evidence of myocardial ischemia, acute coronary syndrome(ST segment elevation, non-ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction, and unstable angina)
  4. Patients diagnosed of type 2 diabetes or small vessel disease
  5. Patients willing to participate in the study through written consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Those hypersensitive to or abstaining from heparin, aspirin, clopidogrel, contrast medium, zotarolimus, or everolimus.
  2. Pregnant women or those having future plans for pregnancy.
  3. Those having hemorrhagic disease or blood-clotting disorders (including heparin-induced thrombocytopenia), or those rejecting blood transfusion.
  4. Those having medical history of digestive and urinary system bleeding during the last 3 months, or who have received major surgery within 2 months.
  5. Those with thrombocytopenia (< 100,000/mm3) or hemoglobin 10.0 g/dL or less.
  6. Those planning a surgery that requires the discontinuation of antiplatelet drugs within next 12 months (especially, thienopyridines type).
  7. When the remaining survival period is expected to be less than 1 year.
  8. Restenosis lesion
  9. Left main coronary artery lesion
  10. Saphenous vein graft stenosis lesion
  11. Left ventricular ejection fraction < 30%
  12. Cardiac shock
  13. Those with liver function failure: When liver enzyme level (ALT) is 3 times the normal upper limit.
  14. Type I diabetes

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: DM arms
comparison of two different stents(Xience prime and Resolute integrity)
Procedure: percutaneous coronary intervention using drug eluting stent

1. Intracoronary stenting

  1. The procedure could be conducted via brachial, radial or femoral approaches.
  2. There are no restrictions regarding lesion's length or diameter. For long lesions, overlapping of several stents would be allowed but only allocated type of stents should be used.
  3. When several lesions are included in the study of a patient, each lesion may be allocated in different groups. Only if deployment of the allocated stent is not possible, crossing to other stent would be allowed.
  4. Direct stenting or bifurcation stenting is allowed.
  5. Predilation before stenting, IVUS examination, and administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor would be determined by investigator.
Other Names:
  • using two drug eluting stent(XIENCE PRIME and RESOLUTE INTEGRITY)
Active Comparator: Small vessel arms
comparison of two different stents(Xience prime and Resolute integrity)
Procedure: percutaneous coronary intervention using drug eluting stent

1. Intracoronary stenting

  1. The procedure could be conducted via brachial, radial or femoral approaches.
  2. There are no restrictions regarding lesion's length or diameter. For long lesions, overlapping of several stents would be allowed but only allocated type of stents should be used.
  3. When several lesions are included in the study of a patient, each lesion may be allocated in different groups. Only if deployment of the allocated stent is not possible, crossing to other stent would be allowed.
  4. Direct stenting or bifurcation stenting is allowed.
  5. Predilation before stenting, IVUS examination, and administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor would be determined by investigator.
Other Names:
  • using two drug eluting stent(XIENCE PRIME and RESOLUTE INTEGRITY)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
in-segment late lumen loss (mm)at 12month
Time Frame: 12month
12month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
major adverse cardiac events(MACE) at 12month
Time Frame: 12month

1) Occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) during 12 months

  • Cardiac death
  • Target vessel related myocardial infarction
  • Ischemia driven Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR)
  • Ischemia driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
  • Definite / probable stent thrombosis by ARC definition
12month
MACE at 24month
Time Frame: 24month

2) Occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) during 24 months

  • Cardiac death
  • Target vessel related myocardial infarction
  • Ischemia driven Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR)
  • Ischemia driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
  • Definite / probable stent thrombosis by ARC definition
24month
procedure success rate
Time Frame: 1 day (after procedure)
Procedure success rate proportion of investigational stent deployed successfully without chage to other stent
1 day (after procedure)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Chonbuk National University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2013

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 2, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 18, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 19, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 19, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 18, 2012

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • The COPERES trial

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings