Cost-effectiveness of Home Respiratory Polygraphy (HRP-M)
Non-inferiority Randomized Control Trial About Efficacy and Cost-effectiveness of Home Respiratory Polygraphy Management in Sleep Apneas/Hypopneas Syndrome
Primary objectives:
The efficacy of the therapeutic decision taken by respiratory polygraphy (RP) against polysomnography (PSG) using the Epworth scale;
Secondary Objective:
- the cost-effectiveness of diagnosis and therapeutic decision valued using the Epworth Scale and EuroQol 5D.
- effectiveness of the therapeutic decision by means of: 1) quality of life tests, 2) adherence and compliance to treatment, 3) blood pressure MAP, 4) biochemistry determinations. Design: prospective, randomized, controlled, open, parallel of non-inferiority. 440 patients will be randomized to diagnose and follow treatment based on the RP or the PSG. The follow-up will last 6 months with 4 assessments. Statistical analysis: We will compare the change in the Epworth scale between both arms of treatment through analysis of covariance. The premise of non-inferiority is -2 at the lower limit of 95% IC. Secondary variables will be analyzed using differences in independent means (or non-parametric equivalent) or Chi2 for dichotomous variables. Cost-effectiveness: costs generated by one and another method will be evaluated against the effectiveness of the primary variable using Bayesian techniques
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Cáceres, Spain, 10005
- Juan F. Masa
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion criteria:
- Snoring or sleep apneas observed by partner
- Symptoms that may be secondary to the apneas/hypopneas - concretely, an ESS ≥10
- Age between 18 and 70
- Absence of clinical suspicion of any other sleep pathology which could cause daytime sleepiness
Exclusion criteria:
- Psycho-physical inability to complete questionnaires
- documented structural or coronary cardiopathy not controlled by medical treatment
- Cheyennes-Stokes Syndrome
- Patient has undergone an uvulopalatopharyngoplasty
- Unable to provide informed consent
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Hospital diagnosis
diagnosis of Sleep Apnea and therapeutic decision will perform according to polysomnography
|
A conventional polysomnography will be done to perform the diagnosis and therapeutic decision(CPAP or not).
Treated and untreated will be followed 6 moths
A home respiratory polygraphy will be done to perform the diagnosis and therapeutic decision(CPAP or not).
Treated and untreated will be followed 6 months
|
|
Experimental: Home diagnosis
diagnosis of Sleep Apnea and therapeutic decision will be perform according to home respiratory polygraphy
|
A conventional polysomnography will be done to perform the diagnosis and therapeutic decision(CPAP or not).
Treated and untreated will be followed 6 moths
A home respiratory polygraphy will be done to perform the diagnosis and therapeutic decision(CPAP or not).
Treated and untreated will be followed 6 months
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Determine the efficacy of diagnosis and therapeutic decision-making evaluated using Epworth sleepiness scale as primary variable in patients managed by home RP and by PSG after six months of follow-up.
Time Frame: Six months
|
Six months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
the cost-effectiveness of diagnosis and therapeutic decision valued using the Epworth Scale and EuroQol 5D.
Time Frame: Six months
|
Six months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- PI12/01240
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.