Prospective Trial of EUS-FNA Versus EUS-FNB Using a Novel Core Biopsy Needle (MUCIN)
Randomized Prospective Trial of EUS-FNA Versus EUS-FNB Using a Novel Core Biopsy Needle
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is paramount in the diagnosis and evaluation of cancers involving the gastrointestinal tract. EUS allows for the acquisition of cellular (fine needle aspirate - FNA) or tissue biopsy (fine needle biopsy - FNB) for diagnostic purposes. This has traditionally been done with fine needle aspirate where a needle is inserted into the tumor and potentially malignant cells are extracted for microscopic analysis. More recently, a needle that allows a tissue biopsy for histologic analysis has been FDA approved.
The Echotip Procore (Cook Medical) core biopsy needle (ETP), has been demonstrated to provide excellent efficacy for core biopsy samples. Final diagnostic yield using this needle ranges from 80-90% and appears to be significantly greater than EUS-FNA for lesions requiring histology for diagnosis. However, there is currently only limited data from prospective studies comparing EUS-FNA to EUS-FNB with the ETP needle. The investigators propose a randomized, prospective, cross-over study comparing diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA to EUS-FNB.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is paramount in the diagnosis and evaluation of cancers involving the gastrointestinal tract. EUS allows for the acquisition of cellular (fine needle aspirate - FNA) or tissue biopsy (fine needle biopsy - FNB) for diagnostic purposes. This has traditionally been done with fine needle aspirate where a needle is inserted into the tumor and potentially malignant cells are extracted for microscopic analysis. More recently, a needle that allows a tissue biopsy for histologic analysis has been FDA approved.
We will compare tissue samples obtained by standard FNA to FNB with a sample size of 140 patients with the primary outcome being diagnostic yield. Each patient will be randomized to FNA or FNA. If after 3 passes the on-site evaluation remains inadequate, the endoscopist will crossover to the other arm.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
- UCLA Medical Center
-
San Francisco, California, United States, 94117
- California Pacific Medical Center
-
-
Florida
-
Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612
- Moffit Cancer Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 3.1.1 All patients referred for EUS tissue sampling who provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- 3.2.1 Coagulopathy which is not corrected
3.2.2 Diagnostic EUS determines lesion is not amenable to FNA or FNB
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Fine needle aspiration
fine needle aspiration
|
Fine needle aspiration
Other Names:
FNB
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Fine needle biopsy
|
Fine needle aspiration
Other Names:
FNB
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Diagnostic Yield of EUS-FNB and EUS-FNA
Time Frame: 1 year
|
The investigators' primary outcome measure will assess the diagnostic yield (percentage of patients with a diagnosis) of EUS-FNB (fine-needle biopsy) to provide a final diagnosis of the lesion being sampled.
This will be expressed as a percentage.
|
1 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Specimen Adequacy as Assessed by Rapid-onsite Evaluation of FNA and FNB
Time Frame: 1 year
|
The investigators' secondary outcome will assess the ability to obtain an adequate specimen for in room cytologic evaluation as determined by our cytopathologist.
This will be defined as a sample that is representative (not necessarily diagnostic) of the lesion in question.
This will be expressed as a percentage and compared between FNA and FNB
|
1 year
|
|
Percentage of Patients in Whom a Diagnosis is Achieved After Crossover (%)
Time Frame: 1 yr
|
As above.
Crossover to FNA or FNB occurs after 3 passes without adequate material
|
1 yr
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Srinadh Komanduri, Northwestern University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- FNAFNBmucin
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pancreatic Cancer
-
NCT06388967RecruitingPancreatic Neoplasms | Pancreatic Cancer | Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma | Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma | Pancreatic Cancer Resectable | Pancreatic Carcinoma | Pancreatic Cancer Non-resectable | Pancreatic Cancer Stage III | Pancreatic Cancer Stage | Pancreatic Cancer Stage II
-
NCT02414100WithdrawnPancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma | Stage III Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IV Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IB Pancreatic Cancer
-
NCT07277452Not yet recruiting
-
NCT07436741Not yet recruiting
-
NCT01959672CompletedPancreatic Adenocarcinoma | Stage III Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage II Pancreatic Cancer | Stage I Pancreatic Cancer | Resectable Pancreatic Carcinoma | Stage IA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IB Pancreatic Cancer
-
NCT03825289TerminatedMetastatic Pancreatic Carcinoma | Unresectable Pancreatic Carcinoma | Stage III Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IV Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage II Pancreatic Cancer
-
NCT02345460TerminatedPancreatic Adenocarcinoma | Resectable Pancreatic Cancer | Stage III Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IB Pancreatic Cancer | Poorly Differentiated Malignant Neoplasm | Undifferentiated Pancreatic Carcinoma
-
NCT03977233RecruitingPancreatic Neoplasms | Pancreas Adenocarcinoma | Pancreatic Cancer Resectable | Cancer of Pancreas | Pancreatic Cancer Non-resectable | Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) | Pancreatic Cancer, Adult
-
NCT01954732WithdrawnStage IIA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IB Pancreatic Cancer
-
NCT00305877CompletedStage IIA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IB Pancreatic Cancer
Clinical Trials on Fine needle aspiration
-
NCT00954837Withdrawn
-
NCT06848738Enrolling by invitationLymphoma | Lung Cancer | Sarcoidosis
-
NCT00329017Withdrawn
-
NCT00886847Completed
-
NCT04185337Completed
-
NCT00406120WithdrawnUveal Neoplasms | Choroid Neoplasms | Iris Neoplasms
-
NCT00595660UnknownPalpable Breast Mass
-
NCT03578224Completed