Set-back Suture Versus Traditional Vertical Mattress Suture
Comparing Wound Eversion and Clinical Outcomes in Surgical Wound Repair With Subcuticular Set-back Versus Traditional Vertical Mattress Suturing Techniques
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Sacramento, California, United States, 95816
- UC Davis, Department of Dermatology
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Elliptical surgical wound that needs to be closed with a layered closure
- Wound 3 cm in length or longer
Exclusion Criteria:
- Incarceration
- Active pregnancy
- Less than 18 years of age
- Unable to give informed consent
- Non-English or Dutch speaking (the scar assessment scale described below has only been validated in the English and Dutch languages)
- Wound closure projected to be less than 3 cm in length
- Skin less than 3 mm in thickness (dermis and epidermis combined)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Set-back suture
Wound to be close by set-back suture technique.
|
|
|
Active Comparator: Vertical mattress suture technique
Wound to be closed by vertical mattress technique.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean of sum of 2 blinded reviewers Physician Observer Assessment scores
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Compare the functional and cosmetic outcomes of the two sutured halves of each scar at 3 months follow-up as follows: a. Use a previously validated scar assessment scale called the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale, specifically the averaged sum of the total score of 2 blinded observers. |
3 months
|
|
Scar width
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Width of scar in millimeters for each side of scar measured 1 cm from the midline.
|
3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Height of scar immediately following wound closure
Time Frame: 5 minutes
|
Height of each side of the wound will be measured 1 cm from the midpoint of the wound in millimeters
|
5 minutes
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 247354
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.