Safety and Efficacy Associated With Treating Erectile Dysfunction Patients With Low Intensity Shockwaves by Renova
A Prospective, Randomized, Double Blind With Sham Control, Clinical Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy Associated With Treating Patients Suffering From Erectile Dysfunction With Low Intensity Shockwaves by Renova
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Tel-Aviv, Israel
- The Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Good general health
- Vascular ED for at least 6 months
- International Index of Erectile Function 6 (IIEF-EF) between 11 to 25
- Positive response to PDE5-I (able to penetrate on demand=Responders)
- Negative response to PDE5-I (unable to penetrate on demand even with maximum PDE5-I dosage = Non-responders)
- Stable heterosexual relationship for more than 3 months
Exclusion Criteria:
- Hormonal, neurological or psychological pathology
- Past radical prostatectomy or extensive pelvic surgery
- Recovering from cancer during last 5 years
- Any unstable medical, psychiatric, spinal cord injury and penile anatomical abnormalities
- Clinically significant chronic hematological disease
- Anti-androgens, oral or injectable androgens
- Past radiotherapy treatment of the pelvic region
- International normalized ratio (INR) > 3 for patients using blood thinners (such as Coumadin)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: DOUBLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Low Intensity Shockwave treatment
4 weekly sessions of Low Intensity Shockwave treatment.
|
|
|
SHAM_COMPARATOR: Control group
|
Sham treatment that looks, sounds and feels like the real LISW treatment.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Change from baseline in the IIEF-EF (International Index of Erectile Function- Erectile Function Domain) score at 3 and 6 months post treatment
Time Frame: 1, 3 and 6 months post treatment
|
1, 3 and 6 months post treatment
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Change from baseline in the SEP (Sexual Encounter Profile) Questions 2 and 3 at 3 and 6 months post treatment
Time Frame: 1, 3 and 6 months post treatment
|
1, 3 and 6 months post treatment
|
|
Change from baseline in the GAQ (Global Assessment Questions) at 3 and 6 months post treatment
Time Frame: 1, 3 and 6 months post treatment
|
1, 3 and 6 months post treatment
|
|
Change from baseline in the EDITS (Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction) score at 3 and 6 months post treatment
Time Frame: 1, 3 and 6 months post treatment
|
1, 3 and 6 months post treatment
|
|
Change from baseline in the Partner EDITS (Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction) score at 3 and 6 months post treatment
Time Frame: 1, 3 and 6 months post treatment
|
1, 3 and 6 months post treatment
|
|
Change from baseline in the IPSS (International Prostate Symptom Score) at the end of the treatment
Time Frame: 0 and 6 months post treatment
|
0 and 6 months post treatment
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Vardi Y, Appel B, Jacob G, Massarwi O, Gruenwald I. Can low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy improve erectile function? A 6-month follow-up pilot study in patients with organic erectile dysfunction. Eur Urol. 2010 Aug;58(2):243-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.04.004. Epub 2010 May 6.
- Vardi Y, Appel B, Kilchevsky A, Gruenwald I. Does low intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy have a physiological effect on erectile function? Short-term results of a randomized, double-blind, sham controlled study. J Urol. 2012 May;187(5):1769-75. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.12.117. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
- Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Gendrano N 3rd. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): a state-of-the-science review. Int J Impot Res. 2002 Aug;14(4):226-44. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900857.
- Rosen RC, Allen KR, Ni X, Araujo AB. Minimal clinically important differences in the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function scale. Eur Urol. 2011 Nov;60(5):1010-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.07.053. Epub 2011 Jul 30.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- RENO-03-ICH
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.