Phase 3b Study of Metvix NDL-PDT Versus Metvix c-PDT in Subjects With Actinic Keratoses (COMET2)
Multi-centre, Randomized, Investigator-blind, Intra-individual Active and Vehicle-controlled Study, Comparing Metvix Natural Daylight Photodynamic Therapy Versus Metvix Conventional Photodynamic Therapy in Subjects With Actinic Keratosis
This study was to be conducted as a multi-centre, randomized, investigator-blinded, active and vehicle-controlled, intra-individual (split-face/scalp) non-inferiority (regarding efficacy) and superiority (regarding pain) study.
The primary purpose of this study is to demonstrate the non-inferiority of NDL-PDT compared to c-PDT in terms of lesion complete response rate.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Montpellier, France
- Investigative Site
-
Nantes, France
- Investigational Site
-
Nice, France
- Investigational Site
-
Paris, France
- Investigational Site
-
Rennes, France
- Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Aachen, Germany
- Investigational Site
-
Berlin, Germany
- Investigational Site
-
Muenster, Germany
- Investigational Site
-
Recklinghausen, Germany
- Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
-
Assen, Netherlands
- Investigational Site
-
Maastricht, Netherlands
- Investigational Site
-
Nijmegen, Netherlands
- Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
-
Huesca, Spain
- Investigational Site
-
Madrid, Spain
- Investigational Site
-
Pamplona, Spain
- Investigative Site
-
Valencia, Spain
- Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
-
Karlskoga, Sweden
- Investigational Site
-
Norrköping, Sweden
- Investigational Site
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Clinical diagnosis of mild (Grade 1) and/or moderate (Grade 2) AKs on the face or the scalp on treated areas
- Subject with two symmetrical treated areas half scalps or two half faces excluding ears, chin, bridge of the nose, eyelids and lips inside the vermillion border): no more than a twofold difference in terms of total number of lesions between the two TAs
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subject with clinical diagnosis of at least one severe (Grade 3) AK on treated areas
- Subject with pigmented AK on the treated areas
- Immuno-compromised Subject for idiopathic, disease specific or therapeutic reasons
- Subject with porphyria,
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: NDL-PDT/c-PDT
Metvix natural daylight photodynamic therapy and Metvix conventional photodynamic therapy
|
Metvix natural daylight photodynamic therapy
Other Names:
Metvix conventional photodynamic therapy
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: NDL-PDT/placebo c-PDT
Metvix natural daylight photodynamic therapy and Metvix-placebo conventional photodynamic therapy
|
Metvix natural daylight photodynamic therapy
Other Names:
Metvix placebo conventional photodynamic therapy
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage (%) Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Complete Response at Week 12 in Group 1
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
|
The lesion complete response rate was defined as the percentage of pre-existing and treated lesions at Baseline that were assessed as clear (complete disappearance of the lesion, visually and by palpation) at Week 12. New lesions or the lesions in non-complete response were not not considered in the lesion response assessment.
This outcome measure was analyzed as an intra-individual comparison between Metvix NDL-PDT on one side of the face/scalp and Metvix vehicle cream (placebo) c-PDT on the contralateral side (Group I).
|
Baseline, Week 12
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Nicole Basset Seguin, PhD, MD, Hopital Saint Louis France
- Principal Investigator: Bibiana Perez Garcia, MD, Hospital Ramón y Cajal Spain
- Principal Investigator: Rianne Gerritsen, PhD, MD, Radboud University, Nijmegen Medical Center The Netherlands
- Principal Investigator: Rolf-Markus Sziemies, PhD, MD, Klinik fur Dermatologie und Allergologie Germany
- Principal Investigator: Ingrid Synnerstad, PhD, MD, Hudmottagningen Sweden
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- RD.03.SPR.29112
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.