ExAblate Transcranial MR Guided Focused Ultrasound for the Treatment of Essential Tremors

August 2, 2024 updated by: InSightec

A Pivotal Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of ExAblate Transcranial MRgFUS Thalamotomy Treatment of Medication Refractory Essential Tremor Subjects

The objective of this prospective, randomized, double-blind (to subjects, local site's blinded assessor and Tremor Core Lab assessors), crossover, multi-site, two-arm study (ExAblate treated arm Vs ExAblate Sham treated control arm) is to test the efficacy of treatment using the ExAblate Transcranial System and to further demonstrate safety in medication-refractory tremor in subjects with essential tremor (ET).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study is evaluating a new technique for performing Thalamotomy for tremor control. While current techniques have possible invasive or radiation effects, the use of ExAblate if totally non-invasive and without any radiation. After informed consent and screening, eligible subjects will be randomized to either an ExAblate treatment or an ExAblate Sham or "fake" procedure. The chance of randomization to Sham is one out of four. Subjects who are randomized to Sham Control will undergo the same procedure and follow-up visits through their Month 3 visit. After the Month 3 assessments are complete, all subjects will be unblinded and those in the Sham treated group will have the option for an actual ExAblate treatment in an unblinded fashion, as long as they still qualify for ExAblate treatment. All subjects will be followed at 6 and 12 months and for up to 5 years as directed by their doctor.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
76

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N 3M5
        • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
  • Japan
      • Tokyo, Japan, 162-8666
        • Tokyo Women's Medical University (TWMU)
  • Korea, Republic of
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 120-752
        • Yonsei University Medical Center
  • United States
    • California
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305
        • Stanford University Medical Center
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201
        • University of Maryland Medical System
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital
    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22908
        • University of Virginia
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98122
        • Swedish Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

22 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men and women, age 22 years and older
  • Subjects who are able and willing to give informed consent and able to attend all study visits
  • Subjects with a diagnosis of Essential Tremor as confirmed from clinical history and examination by a neurologist or neurosurgeon specialized in movement disorder
  • Subject exhibits a significant disability from their ET despite medical treatment
  • Subjects should be on a stable dose of all ET medications for 30 days prior to study entry
  • Subject is able to communicate sensations during the ExAblate Transcranial procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with unstable cardiac status
  • Severe hypertension
  • Subjects with standard contraindications for MR imaging such as non-MRI compatible implanted metallic devices including cardiac pacemakers, size limitations, etc.
  • Known intolerance or allergies to the MRI contrast agent including advanced kidney disease or severely impaired renal function
  • Significant claustrophobia that cannot be managed with mild medication
  • Current medical condition resulting in abnormal bleeding and/or coagulopathy
  • Receiving anticoagulant (e.g. warfarin) or antiplatelet (e.g. aspirin) therapy within one week of focused ultrasound procedure or drugs known to increase risk or hemorrhage
  • History of intracranial hemorrhage
  • History of multiple strokes, or a stroke within past 6 months
  • Subjects who are not able or willing to tolerate the required prolonged stationary supine position during treatment
  • Are participating or have participated in another clinical trial in the last 30 days
  • Subjects unable to communicate with the investigator and staff
  • Subjects with a history of seizures within the past year
  • Subjects with brain tumors

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Transcranial ExAblate
Device: Transcranial ExAblate
Other Names:
  • Thalamotomy
  • ExAblate
  • TcMRgFUS
Sham Comparator: Sham Transcranial ExAblate
Sham Treatment with Transcranial ExAblate
Device: Sham Transcranial ExAblate

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tremor Motor Score - Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST Part A (Upper Extremity) + Part B) Percent Change From Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 Months post-treatment
The percent change from baseline to Month 3 follow-up in upper extremity Tremor-Motor scores for the treated side is a sub-scale of Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) Part A and Part B sum that was used to measure treated-side upper extremity tremor changes over time. Tremor-motor scores range from 0-32 points. Individual subject's scores at Baseline and 3 Months were used to calculate percent change from baseline and averaged across subjects. High percent change from baseline is better (shows improvement).
Baseline, 3 Months post-treatment
Number of Device and Procedure Related Adverse Events
Time Frame: 5 Years post treatment.
The cumulative sum of adverse events was followed through Year 5 of the study.
5 Years post treatment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tremor Motor Score - Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) Part A (Upper Extremity) + Part B Percent Change From Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months, 2, 3, 4, 5 Years post treatment
The percent change from baseline to Month 3 follow-up in upper extremity Tremor-Motor scores for the treated side is a sub-scale of Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) Part A and Part B sum that was used to measure treated-side upper extremity tremor changes over time. Tremor-motor scores range from 0-32 points. Individual subject's scores at Baseline and Follow Up were used to calculate percent change from baseline and averaged across subjects. High percent change from baseline is better (shows improvement).
Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months, 2, 3, 4, 5 Years post treatment
Clinical Rating Scale (CRST) Part A - Posture Score, Percent Change From Baseline (Pre-treatment)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months, 2, 3, 4, 5 Years post treatment
The Posture Score is a sub-Score of the Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor CRST Part A - Posture (Treated Side Upper Extremity Posture Score). The scores range 0-12 and higher scores indicate worse outcomes. For percent improvement compared to Baseline (pre-treatment visit) higher percents mean better outcomes.
Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months, 2, 3, 4, 5 Years post treatment
Functional Disabilities - Clinical Rating Scale (CRST) for Tremor Part C Score Percent Change From Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months, 2, 3, 4, 5 Years post treatment
1. Subject daily functionalities: as measured by CRST Part-C (subscales) as percent change from Baseline. CRST Part-C is an 8-item score range 0-32. Higher percent change from Baseline means better outcomes.
Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months, 2, 3, 4, 5 Years post treatment
Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST) Summary Total Percent Change From Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months, 2, 3, 4, 5 Years post treatment
The percent change from baseline to follow-up QUEST Summary Total was used to assess quality of life changes over time in tremor patients. The QUEST consists of five dimensions for each subject converted to a percent of the total (0-100%). The summary total is the average of the five dimensions. High percent change from baseline is better (shows improvement).
Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months, 2, 3, 4, 5 Years post treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
InSightec

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 24, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 24, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 27, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 5, 2013

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 10, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 27, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 2, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ET002

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Study Data/Documents

  1. Clinical Study Report

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings