Frailty Assessment Before Cardiac Surgery & Transcatheter Interventions

August 29, 2016 updated by: Jonathan Afilalo, Jewish General Hospital
Frailty is a state of decreased physiologic reserves and vulnerability to stressors. Several tools exist to measure frailty, some based on physical tests and others on questionnaires, yet there is no agreement on which tool to recommend. This multi-center prospective cohort study is aimed at comparing various frailty assessment tools to determine which best predicts death or major complications after cardiac surgery or transcatheter intervention. The population of interest is elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement. The frailty assessment tools under investigation include composite frailty scales, physical performance tests, muscle mass, and biomarker expression. The overall objective is to improve our ability to predict risk by measuring frailty using the optimal tool in elderly cardiovascular patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
800

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
        • St. Paul's Hospital
    • Manitoba
      • Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
        • St. Boniface Hospital
    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
        • Hamilton General Hospital
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
        • Ottawa Heart Institute
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
        • St. Michael's Hospital
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3T 1E2
        • Jewish General Hospital
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada
        • Montreal Heart Institute
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada
        • Royal Victoria Hospital
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada
        • Centre hospitalier université de Montréal
  • France
      • Massy, France, 91300
        • Hôpital Jacques Cartier
  • United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Brigham & Women's Hospital
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27705
        • Duke University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

70 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

In-patients and out-patients referred for surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥70 years (a site-specific substudy at the JGH will enroll ages ≥21 years)
  2. Severe AS
  3. Referred for surgical or transcatheter AVR (with or without concomitant revascularization)
  4. Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Emergency surgery
  2. Clinical instability: decompensated heart failure, active ischemia, unstable vital signs
  3. Severe neuropsychiatric impairment
  4. Not English or French speaking
  5. Replacement of >1 valve or aortic surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Aortic valve replacement
Patients aged ≥70 years referred for surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-procedural mortality or major morbidity
Time Frame: 30 days
Mortality is defined as death from any cause. Major morbidity is defined as an aggregate of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) and Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC) composite endpoints. Additionally, the individual components of this composite endpoint will be examined.
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Length of stay
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: 6-12 months
6-12 months
Functional status
Time Frame: 6-12 months
6-12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Cognitive function
Time Frame: 6-12 months
6-12 months
Mood disturbance
Time Frame: 6-12 months
6-12 months
Delirium
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
Disposition
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
Readmission
Time Frame: 6-12 months
6-12 months
Cost analysis and resource use
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
Echocardiographic function of ventricles and valves
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
Longitudinal recovery of physical and cognitive functioning
Time Frame: Monthly (1-12 months)
Monthly (1-12 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Jewish General Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Massachusetts General Hospital
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Duke University
Brigham and Women's Hospital
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
McMaster University
Unity Health Toronto
St. Paul's Hospital, Canada
Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation
Montreal Heart Institute
Royal Victoria Hospital, Canada
St. Boniface Hospital
Hopital du Sacre-Coeur de Montreal

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jonathan Afilalo, MD MSc, Jewish General Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 26, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 29, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 3, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 31, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 29, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MOP-123314

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings