Relationship Between Bladder Distention and Hysteroscopy Application
The Impact of Bladder Distention on Execution of Diagnostic Hysteroscopy Procedure; a Randomised Controlled Trial.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Tekirdag, Turkey, 59100
- Namık Kemal University Faculty of Medicine Department of Obstetric and Gynecology
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Women who are at reproductive age
- Women who are not pregnant at the time of presentation
- Women who are not nulliparous
Exclusion Criteria:
- Women who have previous cervical surgery or cervical incompetence.
- Women who have genitourinary infection
- Women who have profuse uterine bleeding or recent uterine perforation
- Women who have neurological disorders affecting evaluation of pain.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Full Bladder
Hysteroscopy conducted under full bladder.
|
|
|
Experimental: Empty Bladder
Hysteroscopy conducted under empty bladder.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Ease of Cervical Entry
Time Frame: 2 months
|
Ease of cervical entry which will be assessed by Likert scale.The outcome measures in this study were the ease of cervical entry (judged by the individual surgeons using a 5-point Likert scale: very difficult= 1, difficult= 2, fair = 3, easy= 4, and very easy = 5.
|
2 months
|
|
Pain Scoring(VAS)
Time Frame: 2 months
|
Pain scoring was made by 10 cm visual analog scale.
pain score (recorded by the patient on a 10 -point visual analog scale (VAS) which means pain increases with increasing number
|
2 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Acceptability and Pain Scoring
Time Frame: two months
|
Patient acceptability and pain scoring will be evaluated by Likert scale and visual analog scale.
|
two months
|
|
Procedure Duration
Time Frame: two months
|
Procedural time which will be measured in minutes
|
two months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Cem Celik, Assist Prof, Namik Kemal University Faculty of Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- De Iaco P, Marabini A, Stefanetti M, Del Vecchio C, Bovicelli L. Acceptability and pain of outpatient hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2000 Feb;7(1):71-5. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(00)80012-2.
- Kabli N, Tulandi T. A randomized trial of outpatient hysteroscopy with and without intrauterine anesthesia. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 May-Jun;15(3):308-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.01.013. Epub 2008 Mar 20.
- Carta G, Palermo P, Marinangeli F, Piroli A, Necozione S, De Lellis V, Patacchiola F. Waiting time and pain during office hysteroscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012 May-Jun;19(3):360-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.01.017. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
- Pansky M, Feingold M, Bahar R, Neeman O, Asiag O, Herman A, Sagiv R. Improved patient compliance using pediatric cystoscope during office hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004 May;11(2):262-4. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60211-3.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 9598
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Menorrhagia
-
NCT07402369RecruitingUterine Fibroids With Menorrhagia
-
NCT02023801CompletedMenorrhagia Due to Benign Causes
-
NCT02029911CompletedMenorrhagia Due to Benign Causes
-
NCT03704454UnknownMenopause | Climacteric; Menorrhagia, Menopausal
-
NCT01085487CompletedIdiopathic Menorrhagia
-
NCT02035332CompletedMenorrhagia Due to Benign Causes
-
NCT05406960CompletedMetrorrhagia | Hysterectomy | Heavy Menstrual Bleeding | Abnormal Uterine Bleeding | Menorrhagia; Postmenopausal
-
NCT02475356Completed
-
NCT07557992RecruitingMenorrhagia Due to Benign Causes
Clinical Trials on Hysteroscopy
-
NCT02543515Completed
-
NCT01544426Completed
-
NCT03827824Terminated
-
NCT02939196UnknownPain Associated Office Hysteroscopy
-
NCT05412771Recruiting
-
NCT04637373UnknownIntrauterine Adhesion | Retained Products of Conception