Project TEACH-Kenya (TEACH)

May 7, 2015 updated by: Yvette Calderon,MD, MS, North Bronx Healthcare Network

Project Tailoring Effective And Community-based HIV Interventions in Kenya

Public health programs and policies have utilized the "combination prevention" model of bringing together tailored, proven interventions in order to reduce the global impact of HIV. Project TEACH-Kenya adapts two effective HIV interventions, Project BRIEF (Behavioral intervention, Rapid HIV test, Innovative video, Efficient cost and health care savings, Facilitated seamless care) and STEP (Skill-based Teenage Education Program for HIV prevention) to increase HIV testing and counseling rates, implement proven risk reduction programs, and improve rates of linkage to care and ART initiation among adolescents in Kenya. The collaboration with St. Francis Community Hospital and input from the Kasarani community will increase the breadth, reach, and impact of this HIV prevention intervention in Kenya.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

In 2010, HIV/AIDS accounted for up to 29% of all deaths and 24% of all disabilities in Kenya. There is a particular need to concentrate HIV education, testing, and linkage-to-care efforts among high-risk adolescents; by age 18, 47% of women and 58% of men have had sexual intercourse. Only one in four young Kenyans used condoms the first time they had sex, and only half of 15-24 year olds had comprehensive HIV knowledge. The goal of this intervention, Project TEACH-Kenya, is to adapt two proven HIV interventions, Project BRIEF and STEP, to an urban setting in the Kasarani District of the Nairobi Province, Kenya. According to the US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) Five-Year Strategy, a successful prevention program brings together a combination of evaluated, tailored interventions, to stem the spread of HIV infection among high-risk populations. This synergistic model, referred to as combination prevention, serves as the basis for adapting the current intervention encompassing HIV testing and counseling, risk behavior reduction programs, and linkage to care and ART initiation to the Kenyan context. Project TEACH-Kenya will develop tailored, theory-based educational videos, linkage procedures, and a tailored prevention program for adolescents 13-18 years old and pilot and test the intervention at St. Francis Community Hospital, a high volume community-based hospital in Kasarani. The majority of adolescents that access St. Francis's services are orphan and vulnerable children affected by HIV/AIDS (OVC-HIV) who are disproportionately poor and malnourished and are at increased risk for acquiring HIV, stressing the need for this intervention. The outcome of this project will be a feasible, evidence-based, cost- and time-effective program to improve HIV education and increase testing and linkage-to-care rates among adolescents in Kenya.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Kenya
    • Kasarani
      • Nairobi, Kasarani, Kenya
        • St. Francis Community Hospital
  • United States
    • New York
      • Bronx, New York, United States, 10461
        • Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women and minorities will not be excluded from this research study. We will include only adolescents ages 13-18 at time of recruitment in this study, because that is the age group that we are targetting for this intervention. Residents must be of the St. Francis Hospital catchment area

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Over the age of 18 and under the age of 13. Unable to understand the consent process for the study; or otherwise unable to consent to HIV testing.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Intervention
Those randomized to the intervention group will be invited to attend the risk reduction intervention.
Behavioral: Risk Reduction Intervention
STEP is based on social learning theory and provides age-appropriate and culturally acceptable HIV prevention information in a format that encourages information growth and skills enhancement. The program is delivered by 'Instructors,' undergraduate college students aged 18-24, one hour per week for 10 weeks.
No Intervention: Control
The control group will receive usual care. Both treatment and control groups will have received the video-based risk reduction intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility
Time Frame: up to 15 months

Feasibility of implementing project STEP will be measured by acceptance and participation rates. Evaluation outputs include:

  1. Efficiency: Number of eligible participants, number randomized into each age and experimental group,
  2. Acceptance rates (number of people who agree to participate in program; number who complete the whole 10 week program);
  3. Population characteristics: We will describe the demographic and behavioural profiles of those who participated in the program and those who refuse; the level of HIV knowledge, self efficacy and satisfaction with the program.
  4. Satisfaction/acceptability: College student recruitment, receptivity and satisfaction with the project; implementation issues and resource use
up to 15 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Risk Reduction
Time Frame: up to 15 months
HIV related knowledge will be measured using the HIV KQ-18; stigma will be measured using the AIDS-Related Stigma Scale. Sexual history will also be measured using the traditional Project B.R.I.E.F. survey. The questionnaire will be piloted for receptiveness. We will ask for ratings of satisfaction with the video-based pre-counseling and education/prevention post test using measures used by Calderon.
up to 15 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
North Bronx Healthcare Network

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Rosy Chhabra, PsyD, Albert Einstein College of Medicine
  • Principal Investigator: Yvette Calderon, MD, MS, North Central Bronx Healthcare Network
  • Study Director: Erick Nyambedha, St. Francis Community Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2015

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 2, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 8, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 9, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 8, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 7, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2013-PA-12-231

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings