Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation for Gynecological Cancer Patients

June 4, 2013 updated by: Eun Joo Yang, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Neuromodulation System for Pelvic Floor Dysfunction Based on the Myo-neurophysiological Assessment for Gynecological Cancer Patients

As cancer treatment improves, the cancer survivor's quality of life and level of function have gained increasing importance. Pelvic floor function is directly affected by gynecological cancer and treatment, and pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) can severely affect a patient's life. PFD negatively affects health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Evaluation of PFD provides information about the disease burden and treatment-related effects directly from the patient's perspective and informs clinical decision-making. The pelvic floor musculature and sacral nerves are not easily accessible, and it is difficult to test them. Several functional assessments have been used to evaluate pelvic floor dysfunction; however, reports on methodology are sparse, and consensus on their use is lacking. Research on functional outcomes is highly complex and, consequently, must be addressed in a comprehensive framework.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Patients with cervical or colorectal cancer who underwent surgery or radiotherapy are recruited for the study.

  • PFM strength is measured using a perineometer (BioCon-200,McubeTechnologyCompany,Seoul,Korea). Vaginal pressure is measured using a vaginal silicon pressure sensor (cmH2O; sensitivity0.06kPa,sensitivity 5mV, threshold1.5V).
  • The motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from the pelvic floor are obtained by sacral and transcranial magnetic stimulation using a Magstim 200 stimulator (Magstim Co., Whitland, Wales, UK). Patients are instructed to lie in the left lateral decubitus position,intra-anal sponge electrode (Dantec,Skovlund, Denmark)was lubricated and gently inserted into the anal canal.
  • Monophasic single pulses of magnetic stimuli were delivered to the vertex corresponding to the primary motor center in the precentral gyrus using a double-cone coil(9902-00,Magstim). A figure-eight coil(9762-00,Magstim)was used to stimulate the dorsolateral area of the sacrum corresponding to the exit of the sacral cortical facilitation
  • We measured the latency, amplitude, and excitability threshold(ET) of MEPs detected in pelvic floor muscles with and without facilitation. The excitability threshold at rest(RET) is defined as the lowest intensity that produced MEP responses of 100μV For optimal facilitation, we measure the latency of the MEPs with minimal contraction (10% of MVC) with RET intensity and amplitude with a moderate contraction
  • Patient-reported HRQOL Quality of life General and condition-specific aspects of HRQOL were assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaires.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Korea, Republic of
      • Seongnam, Korea, Republic of, 463-707
        • Recruiting
        • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women with gynecological cancer who had radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection

Exclusion Criteria:

  • infectious diseases of the urinary tract and vagina

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: pelvic floor exercise
pelvic floor rehabilitation program with neuromodulation
Behavioral: pelvic floor rehabilitation program with neuromodulation
pelvic floor rehabilitation program with neuromodulation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Amplitude (uV) of motor evoked potential (MEP) evoked by magnetic stimulation on the sacral plexus.
Time Frame: 1week after intervention
We measure the amplitude (uV) of motor evoked potential (MEP) evoked by magnetic stimulation on the sacral plexus at the baseline and 1wk after intervention. Then we compare the change of the amplitude (1 wk after intervention-baseline)between two groups.
1week after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pelvic floor muscle strength(mmHg)
Time Frame: baseline, up to 1week after intervention
We measure the pelvic floor muscle strength using perometer (mmHg)at baseline and 1 wk after intervention then compare the change of pelvic floor muscle strength(1wk after intervention-baseline) between two groups.
baseline, up to 1week after intervention
latency (ms) of MEP (motor evoked potential)
Time Frame: baseline, up to 1week after intervention
We measure the latency (ms) of MEP evoked by magnetic stimulation on the sacral plexus and compare the change of latency (1wk after intervention-baseline)between two groups
baseline, up to 1week after intervention
Functional score and symptom scale of QuEORTC QLQ-C-30,EORTC CX-24
Time Frame: baseline, up to 1week after intervention
We evaluate the functional score and symptom scale with EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-CX24 questionnaires and compare the change between two groups.
baseline, up to 1week after intervention
Total Bladder, bowel,sexual functional scores measured by the pelvic floor questionnaire
Time Frame: baseline, up to 1week after intervention
We evaluated the bladder, bowel, sexual functional scores with the interviewer-administered pelvic floor questionnaire at baseline and 1wk after intervention then compare the change of the scores between two groups
baseline, up to 1week after intervention
Hiatal dimension (mm) and levator plate angle (º) on maximal pelvic floor muscle contraction measure with ultrasound
Time Frame: baseline, up to 1week after intervention
We measure the Hiatal dimension (mm) and levator plate angle (º) on maximal pelvic floor muscle contraction using ultrasound with curved transducer (3.5-6 MHz)at baseline and 1 wk after intervention and compare the change between two groups
baseline, up to 1week after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Eun Joo Yang, MD, PhD, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2014

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 16, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 4, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 7, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 7, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 4, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • B-0906/077-010

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings