Improving Resection Rates Among African Americans With NSCLC

May 8, 2020 updated by: Wake Forest University Health Sciences
This is a randomized, interventional trial in which the navigation is the intervention. Phase is not applicable. The study is a randomized trial to evaluate the impact of a nurse-led patient navigation intervention in improving rates of receipt of lung-directed therapy with curative intent (LDTCI) among African Americans with early stage lung cancer. Study sites are cluster-randomized to either the usual care study arm or the to the navigation intervention study arm. Randomization occurred at the level of the study site rather than at the level of individual participants. There are two arms.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The burden to participants will be minimized to enhance retention. Patients in the usual care arm receive the current "gold standard" of treatment. The patients in the intervention arm are assigned to a PN, who helps to reduce the barriers to care that could negatively impact the patients' receipt of LDTCI. The telephone-administered survey is administered to all study participants at baseline and at 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-enrollment. It takes approximately 30-40 minutes to administer. The telephone mode of survey administration was chosen to reduce the number of visits that would be required by each patient. Interviews are scheduled at the convenience of the study participants. To further reduce burden to the study participants, the interviewers offer breaks during the interview process. Patients in both arms undergo standard therapy visits. Patients in the navigation arm receive standard therapy visits plus the navigation intervention. Outside of the standard therapy visits, no additional clinic visits are required of the study participants.

Once informed consent has been obtained and the informed consent document is received, the SSC/PN will communicate to the MUSC HCC study staff the participant's contact information and that the participant is ready for baseline survey administration. All the study surveys will be administered by trained MUSC HCC study staff via telephone. A survey answer guide will be provided to the participant either in-person or via mail prior to administration of the baseline survey.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
248

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Delaware
      • Lewes, Delaware, United States, 19958
        • Beebe Healthcare Tunnell Cancer Center
    • Georgia
      • Savannah, Georgia, United States, 31405
        • Saint Joseph's/Candler Hospital
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
        • Stroger Hospital of Cook County
    • Louisiana
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70121
        • Ochsner NCORP
    • Michigan
      • Royal Oak, Michigan, United States, 48073
        • Beaumont Hospital - Royal Oak
    • Minnesota
      • Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, United States, 55426
        • Metro-Minnesota NCORP
    • Nevada
      • Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89106
        • Nevada Cancer Research Foundation
    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27127
        • Wake Forest University Health Sciences
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19111
        • Fox Chase
    • Virginia
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23298
        • Virginia Commonwealth University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • AA race
  • Clinically suspicious or biopsy-proven, early stage NSCLC, and
  • Ages 21 years and older

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous history of lung cancer
  • Spread of newly diagnosed probably/proven lung cancer to other part of the body
  • Diagnosis of synchronous cancer other than non-melanoma skin cancer or lung cancer, and
  • Receipt of surgical resection or radiosurgery for lung cancer since diagnosis with probable/proven lung cancer

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Usual Care Arm
Participants who are assigned to the usual care arm may receive the following services: complete staging work-up (CT/PET scan and possible mediastinoscopy), surgical consultation with a general or cardiothoracic surgeon, cardiac clearance and/or pulmonary function testing (if deemed necessary by the evaluating surgeon), surgical resection (wedge resection, lobectomy, pneumonectomy, or radiosurgery, as indicated by the size and location of the tumor), and adjuvant therapy (radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, as determined by the intraoperative findings and pathology results).
Other: Usual Care
Usual care includes: complete staging work-up (CT/PET scan and possible mediastinoscopy), surgical consultation with a general or cardiothoracic surgeon, cardiac clearance and/or pulmonary function testing (if deemed necessary by the evaluating surgeon), surgical resection (wedge resection, lobectomy, pneumonectomy, or radiosurgery, as indicated by the size and location of the tumor), and adjuvant therapy (radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, as determined by the intraoperative findings and pathology results).
Experimental: Intervention Arm

The PN will provide each patient with a copy of the NCI's "What You Need to Know About Lung Cancer" booklet and encourage them to re-contact his/her primary care physician (or the physician who diagnosed their probable/proven NSCLC) to discuss treatment options.

The PNs will provide patients with their contact information and brief patients on their role. The PNs will navigate study participants for up to 4 months (16 weeks, 112 days) after NSCLC diagnosis, until the patient is deemed ineligible for LDTCI (i.e., lung resection or SBRT) by their physician(s), until receipt of LDTCI, or death (whichever comes first).

During the EPDPN intervention period, PNs will contact each intervention group participant by telephone (or in-person) on weekly basis (at minimum).
Other: Intervention Arm
The proposed Intervention (EPDPN) will be administered by the PNs at the intervention sites on an outpatient basis. Several defining, fundamental characteristics of the PNs will ensure consistency of the intervention delivery across the various study sites.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Receipt of LDTCI
Time Frame: 12 Months Post-Enrollment
Receipt of lung-directed therapy with curative intent (LDTCI), Inquiry at time of follow-up survey, confirmed by medical record review
12 Months Post-Enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Receipt of Surgical and/or Radiation Oncology Consultation Confirmed by Medical Record Review
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months Post-Enrollment
• Receipt of surgical and/or radiation oncology consultation (defined as outpatient or inpatient consultation with a general or cardiothoracic surgeon and/or radiation oncologist to discuss LDTCI for NSCLC within 4 months post-diagnosis of probable/proven, early stage NSCLC).
Baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months Post-Enrollment
Time to LDTCI (For Pts. Who Received LDTCI Only) Confirmed by Medical Record Review
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months Post-Enrollment
Time to LDTCI (For Pts. Who Received LDTCI Only). Inquiry at Time of Follow-Up Survey, Confirmed by Medical Record Review. Baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months Post-Enrollment
Baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months Post-Enrollment
Satisfaction with Care Received, Patient Satisfaction(REF) (28 items)
Time Frame: 6 Months Post-Enrollment
Satisfaction with Care Received, Patient Satisfaction(REF) (28 items). 6 Months Post-Enrollment
6 Months Post-Enrollment
Time of Death, Follow-up Survey, Confirmed by Medical Record Review
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months Post-Enrollment
Time of Death. Inquiry at Time of Follow-Up Survey, Confirmed by Medical Record Review , inquiry of cancer registries at study sites, and inquiry of Social Security Death Index. Baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months Post-Enrollment.
Baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months Post-Enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Kathryn E Weaver, PhD, Wake Forest Universith Health Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 23, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 23, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 9, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 17, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 24, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 25, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 12, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 8, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB00031268
  • REBAWF 01414 (Other Identifier: NCI)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings