Soluble Fibre Enriched CHO Food Study

February 4, 2014 updated by: Vladimir Vuksan, Unity Health Toronto

Development of Palatable Soluble Fibre Containing Carbohydrate Foods and Its Effects on Postprandial Blood Glucose Response in Healthy Individuals

The proposed study will examine the effects of incorporating a soluble fibre blend into commonly consumed refined carbohydrate foods on sensory parameters and postprandial blood glucose. A sensory evaluation will be conducted in phase I to asses for differences between the control and fibre enriched samples of white bread, mashed potatoes, muffin, hot breakfast cereal. Phase II will be investigating the postprandial blood glucose responses of the 8 test foods from phase I.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Literature to date points to beneficial glycemic effects from consumption of soluble fibre; however, whole grain products consumption is below recommendations possibly due to the presence of unappealing characteristic organoleptic properties. White, refined products are still the choice of the general public. As such, we propose to investigate the feasibility of increasing health benefits of commonly consumed white, refined carbohydrate products by incorporating a soluble fibre blend.

This research is important to determine the feasibility of developing fibre enriched carbohydrate foods that maintains the original organoleptic properties and is effective in reducing postprandial blood glucose response.

35 subjects will be recruited in phase I to complete a sensory evaluation on the test foods. Following tasting of the control and fibre-enriched samples, data on each subjects' liking or disliking will be collected through a 9-point hedonic scale.

An acute crossover RCT will be conducted in phase II by 10 healthy individuals. Subjects will be randomized to consume one the treatments at each visit and blood glucose levels over 120min and satiety scores will be measured.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
35

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5BW8
        • St. Michael's

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Normotensive (SBP<140mmHg, DBP <90mmHg)
  • BMI 18.5 - 25 kg/m2
  • Post-menopausal or not pregnant women

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy or sensitivity to test meals
  • Swallowing difficulties
  • Chronic use of medications or fibre
  • GI conditions affecting stomach pH
  • Must not be enrolled in another study
  • History of liver or kidney disease, diabetes, hypertension, stroke or myocardial infarctions, thyroid disease, celiac /gastrointestinal disease, HIV positive or AIDS

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: PGX
samples of white bread, mashed potatoes, muffin, hot breakfast cereal with the addition of soluble fibre blend
Dietary supplement: Bread
Samples of white bread, with or without the addition of PGX fibre blend
Dietary supplement: Mashed Potatoes
samples of mashed potatoes, with or without the addition of soluble fibre blend
Dietary supplement: Muffins
Samples of muffins, with or without the addition of PGX fibre blend
Dietary supplement: Hot Breakfast Cereal
Samples of hot breakfast cereal without the addition of soluble fibre blend
Other: Control
samples of white bread, mashed potatoes, muffin, hot breakfast cereal without the addition of soluble fibre blend
Dietary supplement: Bread
Samples of white bread, with or without the addition of PGX fibre blend
Dietary supplement: Mashed Potatoes
samples of mashed potatoes, with or without the addition of soluble fibre blend
Dietary supplement: Muffins
Samples of muffins, with or without the addition of PGX fibre blend
Dietary supplement: Hot Breakfast Cereal
Samples of hot breakfast cereal without the addition of soluble fibre blend

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensory Evaluation
Time Frame: 1 month
Subjects will be recruited in phase I to complete a sensory evaluation on the test foods. Following tasting of the control and fibre-enriched samples, data on each subjects' liking or disliking will be collected through a 9-point hedonic scale.
1 month
Postprandial Glycemia
Time Frame: 3 months
Subjects will be randomized to consume one of the 8 interventions at each visit and blood glucose levels over 120min and satiety scores will be measured.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Satiety Score
Time Frame: 3 months
The incorporation of viscous soluble fibre in commonly consumed carbohydrate foods will result in increase in subjective satiety compared to non soluble fibre enriched products. Satiety will be measured using a satiety questionnaire in which you will answer four questions about how full you feel.
3 months

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety
Time Frame: 3 montsh
Safety will monitored using a symptoms questionnaire.
3 montsh

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Unity Health Toronto

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Vladimir Vuksan, PhD, St. Michael's & University of Toronto

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2014

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 9, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 9, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 12, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 5, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 4, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • White Line
  • 12-379C (Other Identifier: St. Michael's Hospital Research Ethics Board)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings