Feasibility of Interval Debulking Surgery by Laparoscopy for Peritoneal Carcinosis in Chemosensitive Patients (CILOVE)

July 18, 2017 updated by: Centre Jean Perrin

Prospective Study Assessing the Feasibility of Interval Debulking Surgery by Laparoscopy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis of Ovarian Origin, Tubal or Primary Peritoneal, in Chemosensitive Patients Treated by Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

This prospective nonrandomized multicenter phase II study, will evaluate the possibility of performing a laparoscopic interval debulking after a minimum of 3 cycles of chemotherapy in highly chemo-sensitive patients with advanced ovarian, tubal cancer or primary peritoneal.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
47

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Angers, France, 49100
        • Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, site Paul Papin
      • Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63011
        • Centre Jean Perrin
      • Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63003
        • CHU Estaing
      • Marseille, France, 13009
        • Institut Paoli Calmettes
      • Paris, France, 75015
        • Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou
      • Paris, France, 75005
        • Institut Curie
      • Saint Cloud, France, 92210
        • Institut Curie - Hopital Rene Huguenin
      • St Herblain, France, 44805
        • Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest
      • Strasbourg, France, 67000
        • Hôpital de Hautepierre
      • Toulouse, France, 31052
        • Institut Claudius Regaud

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > or = 18 years
  • performance status WHO < 2
  • Epithelial ovarian, fallopian tubes or primary peritoneal carcinoma (histologically confirmed)
  • Unresectable disease because of FIGO stage IV disease proven by imaging (CT Scan or PET CT) and/or diffuse extensive carcinosis considered unresectable for advanced FIGO stage IIIc; or patients unable to support a radical primary surgery because of age, comorbidities or altered general condition.
  • No previous debulking surgery before neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
  • Patients treated with a minimum of 3 cycles of platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
  • Response to chemotherapy was radiologically confirmed (Scan-TAP) prior to interval surgery:

No evidence of peritoneal supra-mesocolic carcinomatosis ; Residual pelvic masses smaller than 10 cm ; Absence of suspect supra-centimeter retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy

  • able to read, write and understand French.
  • Member of a Social Security scheme.
  • written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient unable to support laparoscopy
  • psychiatric condition or social or geographic situation that would impede appropriate study participation
  • Concomitant participation in another clinical trial evaluating surgical treatment (interfering with the evaluation of the main endpoint)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: laparoscopic management
Tumor Debulking Surgery by laparoscopy
Procedure: Tumor Debulking Surgery by laparoscopy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the rate of conversion to laparotomy
Time Frame: surgery
Feasibility of the surgical laparoscopic management of interval debulking surgery will be assessed by the rate of conversion to laparotomy.
surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Port site metastases
Time Frame: during 1 year post surgery
during 1 year post surgery
Morbidity: intraoperative and postoperative complications
Time Frame: during surgery and 1 year post surgery
during surgery and 1 year post surgery
Pain
Time Frame: during the hospital stay (an expected average of 5 days), at 1 week, 1 month, 3 and 6 months post surgery
during the hospital stay (an expected average of 5 days), at 1 week, 1 month, 3 and 6 months post surgery
Quality of life using EORTC QLQ-C30
Time Frame: before surgery (an expected average of 7 days before surgery), 1 week , 1 month, 3 and 6 months post-surgery
before surgery (an expected average of 7 days before surgery), 1 week , 1 month, 3 and 6 months post-surgery
Economic evaluation
Time Frame: 1 year post-surgery
economic evaluation will be assess by a quantification of the additional costs of surgery, duration and cost of hospitalization, number of possible re-interventions or hospitalizations.
1 year post-surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Centre Jean Perrin

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Christophe POMEL, Pr, Centre Jean Perrin

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 9, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 22, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 23, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 19, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 18, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2012-A01391-42

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings