Mild Cognitive Impairment in Breast Cancer Patients (HippoPCI)

April 1, 2020 updated by: Lei Wang, Northwestern University

Hippocampal Predictors of Cognitive Impairment (HippoPCI) in Breast Cancer Patients

The purpose of this study is to improve our understanding of potential changes in size, shape and activity in some brain areas that can occur in women receiving different types of Breast Cancer therapy, and how these changes are related to the development of mild cognitive impairment as the result of these treatments.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

This study aims to identify neuroimaging biomarkers for predicting mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemo and/or hormonal therapy by examining hippocampal-cortical neurocircuitry. Adjuvant therapies increase long-term survival, but produce changes in cognitive function in 30% (up to 70%) of women on average with breast cancer. Cognitive decline negatively impacts quality of life in patients and their supporters. Therefore, early identification of patients at risk for developing treatment-related cognitive impairment is needed to develop potential prevention or treatment options and prevent further decline. Our recent work demonstrates that patients receiving adjuvant hormonal treatment exhibit decline in cognition as soon as three months post treatment. Although neuroimaging studies have identified brain changes associated with chemotherapy ("chemo brain", no investigation has assessed the type and severity of such changes following hormonal therapy, nor has any study determined which individuals are at greatest risk for cognitive impairment.

Our central hypothesis is that measures of the hippocampal-cortical integrity can be used to predict cognitive decline, and changes of specific domains of cognitive performance in patients receiving adjuvant therapy over time will be related to changes in specific components of this circuitry over time.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
84

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants will be recruited from the following sites, all affiliated with Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine (NUFSM): a) outpatient facility at Galter Pavilion of Northwestern Medicine; b) Maggie Daley Center for Women's Cancer Care at Prentice Women's Hospital; and c) Lynn Sage Comprehensive Breast Cancer Center at Prentice Women's Hospital.

Participants will also be recruited a) via advertisement in local newspapers, craigslist, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center (RHLCC) Cancer Survivorship Institute website, and at community programs that serve cancer patients, including hospitals and support groups; and b) from community educational events sponsored by RHLCC, Women's Health Research Institute, and Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer's Disease Center (CNADC).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female, within the age range of 40-70
  • HT Patients - any stage of breast cancer without brain metastasis, will undergo hormonal therapy without chemotherapy
  • CT and HT Patients - any stage of breast cancer without brain metastasis, will undergo chemotherapy and hormonal therapy
  • CT Patients - any stage of breast cancer without brain metastasis, has undergone surgery prior to screening, will undergo chemotherapy without hormonal therapy
  • RT or NT Patients - any stage of breast cancer without brain metastasis, will not undergo chemotherapy or hormonal therapy; may undergo radiation therapy or have no therapy
  • Controls - cognitively normal on the basis of annual neuropsychological and research neurological examinations done as part of the Uniform Data Set (UDS), of the NIA Alzheimer's Disease Centers (ADC) program, recruited from the NU CNADC Clinical Core.
  • All subjects must have given signed, informed consent prior to registration on study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals who report significant medical, neurologic, or psychiatric illness, including but not limited to:
  • Major depression
  • Schizophrenia
  • ADHD
  • Autism
  • Alzheimer's disease
  • Dementia
  • Obsessive-compulsive disorder
  • Post-traumatic stress disorder
  • Individuals with an Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self Report (IDS-SR) score of 30 or higher, since this level of depression could affect cognitive test performance.

  • Brain surgery or head injury

    • Individuals reporting previous head injury
    • Individuals requiring neurosurgical procedures

  • Ineligibility for MRI scanning, including but not limited to:

    • Individuals who have non-MRI compatible medical implants or devices
    • Individuals who have any potential metal in their bodies
    • Individuals who have claustrophobia
    • Individuals with permanent makeup
  • Individuals reporting consumption of drugs that would affect cognition (neuropsychiatric or illicit)
  • Individuals indicating a history of breast cancer will be excluded from the healthy control group
  • Women who are pregnant or are planning to become pregnant during study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
HT Patients
any stage of breast cancer without brain metastasis, will undergo hormonal therapy without chemotherapy
CT and HT Patients
any stage of breast cancer without brain metastasis, will undergo chemotherapy and hormonal therapy
CT Patients
any stage of breast cancer without brain metastasis, has undergone surgery prior to screening, will undergo chemotherapy without hormonal therapy
RT or NT Patients
any stage of breast cancer without brain metastasis, will not undergo chemotherapy or hormonal therapy; may undergo radiation therapy or have no therapy
Controls
healthy, cognitively normal subjects

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rates of change in cognitive function from before treatment to after treatment initiation
Time Frame: approximately 6 months
Measured using a neuropsychological test battery
approximately 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rates of change of brain structure from before treatment to after treatment initiation
Time Frame: approximately 6 months
Measured using structural MRI scan
approximately 6 months
Rates of change of brain function from before treatment to after treatment initiation
Time Frame: approximately 6 months
Measured using a functional MRI scan
approximately 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Northwestern University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Lei Wang, PhD, Northwestern University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 19, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 19, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 24, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 3, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 1, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1R01NR014182-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings