Phase III Study of ASP2151 in Herpes Simplex Patients

October 2, 2024 updated by: Maruho Co., Ltd.

Phase III Study of ASP2151 in Herpes Simplex Patients - A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study -

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ASP2151 in patients with herpes simplex.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study will be conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ASP2151 in patients with herpes simplex (labial/facial herpes or recurrent genital herpes). The efficacy will be evaluated for the primary endpoint defined as, "the proportion of subjects achieving lesion healing by Day 8 of study treatment" to demonstrate the superiority of ASP2151 to placebo. The safety will be evaluated based on adverse events, laboratory tests, vital signs, and ECGs.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
468

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Japan
    • Hokkaido
      • Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
    • Kanagawa
      • Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
    • Tokyo
      • Nakano-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 79 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with a rash associated with moderate or severe herpes simplex, for which oral antiviral medication is indicated

    • Labial/facial herpes: Patients with at least 10 papulae or vesicles/pustules
    • Recurrent genital herpes: Patients with at least 5 papulae or vesicles/pustules on the genital organs or in the genital and circumanal region
  2. Patients who can start receiving the study drug within 48 hours after onset of rash
  3. Age: 20 years or older, but younger than 80 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who are not expected to have an adequate response to oral antiviral medication
  2. An extreme decline in immune function
  3. Presence of serious complications

  4. Patients found to meet any of the following conditions based on laboratory tests performed within 14 days before informed consent:

    • AST or ALT ≥ 2.5 x upper limit of normal
    • Platelet count < lower limit of normal
    • Serum creatinine ≥ 1.5 mg/dL
    • Creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min
  5. Current or previous history of malignant tumor within 5 years before informed consent
  6. Diagnosis of autoimmune disease
  7. Evidence of bone marrow suppression

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: ASP2151
Drug: ASP2151
200 mg once daily
Placebo Comparator: ASP2151 placebo
Drug: ASP2151 placebo
once daily

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Healing by Day 8
Time Frame: 8days
The percentage of participants achieving lesion healing by Day 8 of study treatment
8days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Healing
Time Frame: 29days

The criteria for determining healing are as follows:

  1. A condition where all erythematous and papular lesions, vesicular and pustular lesions, and erosive and ulcerative lesions have been resolved, and either the complete resolution of crusts or the complete epithelialization beneath any remaining crusts has been achieved.
  2. In participants where no crust has formed, a condition characterized by the epithelialization of erosions/ulcers formation in mucosal lesions and potentially other affected areas.
  3. In participants where no vesicles or pustules have formed, a condition characterized by the complete resolution of all erythematous and papular lesions
29days
Time to Complete Crusting
Time Frame: 29days

The criteria for complete crust formation are outlined as follows:

  1. A condition where all erythematous and papular lesions, vesicular and pustular lesions, and erosive and ulcerative lesions have been resolved, and all rashes are crusted (epithelialization beneath is not required).
  2. In participants where no crust has formed, a condition characterized by the epithelialization of erosions/ulcers formation in mucosal lesions and potentially other affected areas.
  3. In participants where no vesicles or pustules have formed, a condition characterized by the complete resolution of all erythematous and papular lesions.
29days
Time to Virus Disappearance
Time Frame: 29days
The day of viral disappearance is the first day on which the results of viral isolation continuously show 'HSV negative' until the final implementation day. The negative means that the results of the isolation and culture are negative, or the isolation and culture has not been performed due to complete crusting or healing of the lesion site.
29days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Maruho Co., Ltd.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 27, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 26, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 8, 2013

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 10, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 2, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • M522101-J11

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings