A Prospective Observational Study of Lymphedema in Breast Cancer With Axillary Lymph Node Dissection

October 13, 2015 updated by: So-Youn Jung, National Cancer Center, Korea

A Prospective Observational Study of Lymphedema in Breast Cancer With Axillary Lymph Node Dissection (ALND)

Over the past few years, several studies have been made on various outcomes about the incidence of lymphedema. Because the outcomes can be came out differently each study by measurement, criteria, treatment period, treatment method and morbid extremities of lymphedema. Therefore it is required for understanding about the incidence, risk factor and physical progress for to be treated and prevented of lymphedema. Also it is necessary that to understand characteristics of lymphedema measurements and to establish diagnostic criteria of lymphedema through comparative study.

The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence and risk factor of lymphedema through prospectively observation, and to determine effects on the quality of life of lymphedema after breast cancer surgery with ALND.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Primary Objectives:

- To analyze incidence rate of lymphedema using tape measurements, perometre, bioimpedance, spectroscopy.

Secondary Objectives:

  • To determine the risk factor of lymphedema in postoperative breast cancer.
  • To understand that lymphedema has an effect on quality of life and physical function in postoperative breast cancer.
  • To complete uestionnaire about physical and quality of life in postoperative breast cancer with ALND patients.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
400

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Korea, Republic of
    • Gyeonggi-do
      • Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of, 410-769
        • National Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

This prospective study is observational study that focused on incidence of lymphedema in breast cancer patients. Annually six hundred patients have received treatment of breast cancer from the breast cancer center at National Cancer Center in Korea. Among of them, two hundred patients have received surgical treatment with axillary dissection. About four hundred patients were recruited consecutively for enrollment from May 2012 to December 2013.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Older than 20 years old
  • Patient who underwent unilateral Breast Cancer surgery with ALND
  • Informed consent must to be signed

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous history of breast cancer
  • History of abnormality or vascular disease in upper extremity
  • Patients with other serious systemic illness (renal failure, hepatic dysfunction, congestive heart failure, neurological or psychological impairment) that would confound the study or impair the patients' ability to participate.
  • History of infection on upper extremity
  • History of corticosteroid use on whole body for any reason
  • Inability to provide informed consent (e.g. dementia or severe cognitive impairment)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To evaluate the incidence of lymphedema in upper arm after ALND
Time Frame: Up to 1year
In this study, we evaluated the incidence of lymphedema in upper arm using tape measurement, perometre and bioimpedance spectroscopy during pre,post-operative visit, 3, 6, 9month and 1year clinical follow-up.
Up to 1year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To Evaluate quality of life using questionnaire
Time Frame: Up to 1year
  • European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer(EORTC) the 30-item version of the core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ C30)
  • EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire - Breast Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ BR23)
Up to 1year
Physical assess
Time Frame: Up to 1year
  • Questionnaire: Disabilities of the arm shoulder and hand using (DASH)
  • Physical examination
Up to 1year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
National Cancer Center, Korea

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 14, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 21, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 25, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 15, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 13, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NCC-1210181-2

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings