Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients With Chronic Treatment Resistant Depression (STHYM)
Major depressive disorders are real public health issues in terms of diagnosis and treatment. Some forms of depression are chronic and resistant to treatment (TRD). In these forms suicide risk is important.
Patients with TRD are potential candidates for neurosurgical interventions to treat depression. However, psychosurgery interventions based upon lesions, showed their limitations related to 1. the large variability in neurosurgical gestures, 2. their side effects, and of course 3. the irreversible damage caused by the surgery.
Thus, deep brain stimulation (DBS) could represent an opportunity for patients suffering from TRD. Our preliminary study based upon the stimulation of the accumbens nucleus showed encouraging results. The investigators have thus planned a randomized controlled trial versus sham stimulation to confirm the therapeutic value of nucleus accumbens DBS.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Because of their recurrent nature, their prevalence and their consequences, major depressive disorders are real public health issues in terms of diagnosis and treatment.
Some forms of depression are chronic and resistant to treatment (TRD), either unipolar (repeated episodes of depression) or bipolar (repeated episodes of depression and manic and/or hypomanic episodes). In these forms suicide risk is important.
Patients with TRD are potential candidates for neurosurgical interventions to treat depression. The benefit of neurosurgical procedures is expected to be important in these patients.
Psychosurgery interventions based upon lesions, however, showed their limitations related to 1/ the large variability in neurosurgical gestures, 2/ their side effects, and of course 3/ the irreversible damage caused by the surgery.
Current brain imaging data yielded fresh information about the pathophysiology of depression and suggested new therapeutic approaches in TRD.
Modulation of sub-caudate specific pathways, which are part of orbitofrontal and anterior cingulate cortico-subcortical loops should allow for a diminution of depressive symptoms.
The modulation of these specific pathways, initially targeted by classical neurosurgery, could benefit from current developments in functional neurosurgery.
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) may represent an opportunity for patients suffering from TRD. Our preliminary study based upon the stimulation of the accumbens nucleus showed encouraging results. The investigators have thus planned a randomized controlled trial versus sham stimulation to confirm the therapeutic value of nucleus accumbens DBS.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Marseille, France
- APHM
-
Paris, France
- APHP Pitié Salpétrière
-
Poitiers, France
- CHS
-
Rouen, France
- CHS
-
Toulouse, France
- CHU
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age between 18 and 70 years
- DSM-IV (DSM = Diagnostic and Statistical Manual) criteria for a recurrent depressive disorder or bipolar disorder
- Duration of the episode > 2 years
Severity of the episode attested by :
- A HDRS score > 21
- A CGI score ≥ 4
- A GAF < 50
- Persistence of severity criteria during the screening
Following characteristics resistance in case of recurrent depressive disorder :
- Stage V of the classification of Thase and Rush
- Unsuccessful treatment by the association of two antidepressants (or intolerance/contra-indications)
- Unsuccessful treatment by the association for at least 6 weeks of one of the following treatments : lithium , thyroid hormone , buspirone , pindolol with an antidepressant (or intolerance/contra-indications)
- Unsuccessful treatment by the combination of a second-generation antipsychotic (olanzapine, risperidone, amisulpride, aripiprazole, clozapine and quetiapine) to an antidepressant (or intolerance/contra-indications)
- Unsuccessful treatment by a structured psychotherapy
Following characteristics of resistance in case of bipolar disorder:
- Unsuccessful treatment by lithium (or intolerance/contra-indications)
- Unsuccessful treatment by at least one mood stabilizer anticonvulsant (or intolerance/contra-indications)
- Unsuccessful treatment by at least one second-generation antipsychotic (or intolerance/contra-indications)
- Unsuccessful treatment by the combination of two mood stabilizers with at least an anticonvulsant (or intolerance/contra-indications)
- Unsuccessful treatment by electro-convulsive therapy sessions (or intolerance/contra-indications)
- Unsuccessful treatment by at least one antidepressant , mood stabilizer combination (or intolerance/contra-indications)
- Unsuccessful treatment by a structured psychotherapy
- Understanding the conduct of the study
- Giving a written informed consent
- Benefiting from the french social insurance
Non-Inclusion Criteria:
- Comorbid axis 1 disorder (except dysthymia, generalized anxiety disorder, social phobia, panic disorder)
- Alcohol or other psychoactive substances dependence (except nicotine)
- Suicidal risk during the last month assessed by the MINI (Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview), the DIGS (Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies) and the item 3 of the HDRS
- Suicide attempt in the last 6 months or two suicide attempts in the previous two years
- History of forensic act or furious mania
- Depressive episode with congruent or incongruent psychotic features or history of a depressive episode with psychotic features
- Comorbid cluster A or B personality disorders according to the DSM IV-TR evaluated using the SCID2 (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV)
- Cognitive Impairment (Mattis < 130)
- MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) contraindication to stimulation or contraindications for MRI
- Major somatic disease making it impossible to set up the study treatment
- Pregnant women, or nursing or childbearing potential without effective contraception
- Involuntary commitment
- Guardianship
- Participation in another study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: DBS
The medical device includes:
The target is the Accumbens nucleus. The two electrodes are implanted in a single session under local anaesthesia or intermittent sedation (propofol parenteral without intubation early intervention). Day 0 is defined by the surgery. The DBS is "on" during 6 months (between Month 1 and Month 7). Stimulation will also be on after Month 7. |
|
|
Sham Comparator: SHAM
The medical device includes:
The target is the Accumbens nucleus. The two electrodes are implanted in a single session under local anaesthesia or intermittent sedation (propofol parenteral without intubation early intervention). Day 0 is defined by the surgery. The DBS is "off" during 6 months (between Month 1 and Month 7). Possibility to active the stimulation after Month 7. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Response = 50 % decrease of the HDRS-17 (Hamilton depression rating scale, 17 items version) (yes/no)
Time Frame: Month 7
|
Response is defined as a 50 % decrease of the HDRS-17 (Hamilton depression rating scale, 17 items version)
|
Month 7
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Remission (yes/no)
Time Frame: Month 7
|
Remission is defined as an HDRS-17 score < 7
|
Month 7
|
|
CGI (Clinical global impressions) amelioration (yes/no)
Time Frame: Month 7
|
Score of 1 or 2 (item 2 of the CGI)
|
Month 7
|
|
GAF (Global assessment of functioning)
Time Frame: Month 7
|
Presence of a score ≥ 60
|
Month 7
|
|
HDRS-17 (Hamilton depression rating scale, 17 items version)
Time Frame: Month 7
|
Score
|
Month 7
|
|
MADRS (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale)
Time Frame: Month 7
|
Score
|
Month 7
|
|
BDI (Beck Depression Inventory)
Time Frame: Month 7
|
Score
|
Month 7
|
|
CGI (Clinical global impressions)
Time Frame: Month 7
|
Score
|
Month 7
|
|
LARS (Lille Apathy Rating scale)
Time Frame: Month 7
|
Score
|
Month 7
|
|
GAF (Global assessment of functioning)
Time Frame: Month 7
|
Score
|
Month 7
|
|
Neuropsychological assessment
Time Frame: Day -7 ; Month 1; Month 7; Month 13; Month 19; Month 24
|
Day -7 ; Month 1; Month 7; Month 13; Month 19; Month 24
|
|
|
Cerebral metabolism (PET scans)
Time Frame: Day -7; Month 7
|
Day -7; Month 7
|
|
|
Adverse events
Time Frame: Month 24
|
Adverse events occuring during the study.
|
Month 24
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
HDRS-17 (Hamilton depression rating scale, 17 items version)
Time Frame: Month -3 ; Month -1; Day -7; Day 15; Month 1; Day 45; Month 2 ; Day 75 ; Month 3; Month 4; Month 5; Month 6; Month 7; Month 8; Month 9; Month 10; Month 13; Month 16; Month 19; Month 22; Month 24
|
Longitudinal evolution of the score
|
Month -3 ; Month -1; Day -7; Day 15; Month 1; Day 45; Month 2 ; Day 75 ; Month 3; Month 4; Month 5; Month 6; Month 7; Month 8; Month 9; Month 10; Month 13; Month 16; Month 19; Month 22; Month 24
|
|
MADRS (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale)
Time Frame: Month -3 ; Month -1; Day -7; Day 15; Month 1; Day 45; Month 2 ; Day 75 ; Month 3; Month 4; Month 5; Month 6; Month 7; Month 8; Month 9; Month 10; Month 13; Month 16; Month 19; Month 22; Month 24
|
Longitudinal evolution of the score
|
Month -3 ; Month -1; Day -7; Day 15; Month 1; Day 45; Month 2 ; Day 75 ; Month 3; Month 4; Month 5; Month 6; Month 7; Month 8; Month 9; Month 10; Month 13; Month 16; Month 19; Month 22; Month 24
|
|
BDI (Beck Depression Inventory)
Time Frame: Day -7; Day 15; Month 1; Day 45; Month 2 ; Day 75 ; Month 3; Month 4; Month 5; Month 6; Month 7; Month 8; Month 9; Month 10; Month 13; Month 16; Month 19; Month 22; Month 24
|
Longitudinal evolution of the score
|
Day -7; Day 15; Month 1; Day 45; Month 2 ; Day 75 ; Month 3; Month 4; Month 5; Month 6; Month 7; Month 8; Month 9; Month 10; Month 13; Month 16; Month 19; Month 22; Month 24
|
|
CGI (Clinical global impressions)
Time Frame: Month -3 ; Month -1; Day-7; Day15; Month 1; Day 45; Month 2 ; Day 75 ; Month 3; Month 4; Month 5; Month 6; Month 7; Month 8; Month 9; Month 10; Month 13; Month 16; Month 19; Month 22; Month 24
|
Longitudinal evolution of the score
|
Month -3 ; Month -1; Day-7; Day15; Month 1; Day 45; Month 2 ; Day 75 ; Month 3; Month 4; Month 5; Month 6; Month 7; Month 8; Month 9; Month 10; Month 13; Month 16; Month 19; Month 22; Month 24
|
|
LARS (Lille Apathy Rating scale)
Time Frame: Day -7; Month 1; Month 7; Month 13; Month 19; Month 24
|
Longitudinal evolution of the score
|
Day -7; Month 1; Month 7; Month 13; Month 19; Month 24
|
|
GAF (Global assessment of functioning)
Time Frame: Month -3 ; Month -1; Day -7; Month 1; Month 7; Month 13; Month 19; Month 24
|
Longitudinal evolution of the score
|
Month -3 ; Month -1; Day -7; Month 1; Month 7; Month 13; Month 19; Month 24
|
|
YMRS (Young Mania Rating Scale)
Time Frame: Day -7; Month 1; Month 7; Month 13; Month 19; Month 24
|
Longitudinal evolution of the score
|
Day -7; Month 1; Month 7; Month 13; Month 19; Month 24
|
|
MATHYS (Multidimensional Assessment of Thymic States)
Time Frame: Day -7; Month 1; Month 7; Month 13; Month 19; Month 24
|
Longitudinal evolution of the score
|
Day -7; Month 1; Month 7; Month 13; Month 19; Month 24
|
|
Response (50 % decrease of the HDRS-17)
Time Frame: Month 24
|
During the whole follow up
|
Month 24
|
|
Remission
Time Frame: M24
|
During the whole follow up Remission is defined as an HDRS-17 score < 7
|
M24
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Jean Michel Reymann, CIC INSERM 0203 CHU Rennes
- Study Chair: Florian Naudet, CIC INSERM 0203 CHU Rennes
- Principal Investigator: Bruno Millet, Groupe Hospitalier Pitie-Salpetriere
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 35RC08_8902
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.