Tertiary Prevention by Exercise in Colorectal Cancer Therapy (F-PROTECT)

November 24, 2017 updated by: Technical University of Munich

Feasibility Study of the PROTECT-trial (The Potential and Role Of Tertiary Prevention by Exercise in Colorectal Cancer Therapy)

The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility of a one year exercise training program in post-surgical patients with colorectal cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Apart from a genetic predisposition lifestyle factors (low physical activity, nutrition, and obesity) increase the risk of colorectal cancer. Furthermore, in observational studies increased physical activity has shown to improve the prognosis in patients after the diagnosis of colorectal cancer. However, there are currently no prospective randomized controlled trials which prove the causal relationship between exercise and prognosis in colorectal cancer patients. The long-term aim of this study is to evaluate whether physical activity of ≥ 18 MET-h (Metabolic equivalent task-hours) per week significantly improves disease free survival in colorectal cancer survivors (stage UICC II/III). In the first instance, structure-, process- as well as outcome-characteristics need to be investigated within a feasibility study (F-PROTECT). Essential aims are to establish collaborations with clinics and training centres, to achieve the required recruitment numbers, and to conduct the training intervention.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
      • Munich, Germany, 80809
        • Department of Medicine, Division of Prevention and Sports Medicine TU Munich

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • histologically confirmed nonhereditary primary Stage II or III colon cancer diagnosis or rectal cancer
  • written informed consent in German
  • histopathologically confirmed R0-resection
  • start of guideline conformed adjuvant chemotherapy within 12 weeks after R0-resection in Stage III colon cancer diagnosis (if necessary in Stage III colon cancer diagnosis)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • hereditary colon cancer diagnosis
  • R1 and R2 resection
  • clinically relevant complications during recovery
  • secondary neoplasm
  • non-continuance of guideline conformed therapy
  • uncontrolled infection
  • manifest cardiac disease (e.g. unstable CAD, heart failure (NYHA IV), malignant hypertension)
  • clinical relevant respiratory disease (GOLD IV)
  • musculoskeletal disorders severely restricting the patients mobility (e.g. gonarthrosis, coxarthrosis)
  • cirrhosis of the liver (Child B and C)
  • Karnofsky performance status scale ≤ 60%
  • maximal exercise capacity ≤ 50 watt
  • clinically relevant lab factors (leukocyte count ≤ 3000/μl, thrombocyte count ≤ 20.000/μl, hemoglobin < 8 g/dl)
  • physical activity level ≥ 18 MET-h/ week at screening

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Physical activity
Behavioral: Physical activity
The patients will perform increasing volumes of moderate intensity endurance (e.g. walking, cycling) exercise, leading up to 18 MET-hours per week by the end of three months. Patients will then maintain this activity level for the remaining 9 months, with reduced supervision.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Target sample size
Time Frame: one year
The primary outcome measure is to successfully recruit 50 colorectal cancer patients, and to achieve 70% compliance to regular exercise over one year.
one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical activity
Time Frame: at screening and 3, 6, 9, and 12 month after baseline
Physical activity will be measured using physical activity diary, heart rate monitor (Sigma Sport PC 22.13), accelerometer (Aipermotion 440), and the German version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ).
at screening and 3, 6, 9, and 12 month after baseline
Peak oxygen consumption
Time Frame: at baseline and 12 month after baseline
Spiroergometry will be used to assess peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak).
at baseline and 12 month after baseline
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: at 3, 6, 9, and 12 month after baseline
Patient satisfaction will be measured using questionnaire.
at 3, 6, 9, and 12 month after baseline
Cancer related fatigue
Time Frame: at screening and 6 and 12 month after baseline
Fatigue will be measured using the German version of the European Organization for Research on Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-FA13; reduced version with 13 items).
at screening and 6 and 12 month after baseline
Anxiety and depression
Time Frame: at screening and 6 and 12 month after baseline
Anxiety and depression will be assessed with the German version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D).
at screening and 6 and 12 month after baseline
Cancer related quality of life
Time Frame: at screening and 6 and 12 month after baseline
Cancer related quality of life will be assessed with the German Version of the European Organization for Research on Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ C30).
at screening and 6 and 12 month after baseline
Quality of life in colorectal cancer
Time Frame: at screening and 6 and 12 month after baseline
Cancer related quality of life will be assessed with the German Version of the European Organization for Research on Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire in colorectal cancer (EORTC QLQ-CR29).
at screening and 6 and 12 month after baseline
Adverse and serious adverse events
Time Frame: one year
Adverse (e.g. dizziness, high blood pressure) and serious adverse events (e.g. death, prolonged hospitalization) will be reported within 24 hours to the study physician via form.
one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Technical University of Munich

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
German Cancer Aid

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Martin Halle, Prof. M.D., Department of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 18, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 18, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 25, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 28, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 24, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • F-PROTECT

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings