A Phase 1b Study Of Axitinib In Combination With Crizotinib In Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

September 1, 2020 updated by: Pfizer

A PHASE 1B, OPEN LABEL, DOSE ESCALATION STUDY TO EVALUATE SAFETY, PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS OF AXITINIB (AG-013736) IN COMBINATION WITH CRIZOTINIB (PF-02341066) IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED SOLID TUMORS

Despite the success of anti-angiogenic therapy in multiple treatment settings, a fraction of patients are refractory to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor treatment, while the majority of patients will eventually develop evasive resistance. It is proposed that mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (c-MET) and its ligand hepatocyte growth factor (HGF or scatter factor) contribute to VEGF inhibitor resistance, such that combining a c-MET inhibitor with a VEGF inhibitor will provide additional clinical activity compared to VEGF inhibitor alone. This hypothesis will be tested using the cMET/ALK inhibitor, crizotinib, in combination with the VEGF inhibitor, axitinib.Since this will be the first study of axitinib given in combination with crizotinib, the study will primarily assess the safety and tolerability of the combination regimen.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United Kingdom
      • London, United Kingdom, EC1A 7BE
        • St Bartholomew's Hospital - Barts Health NHS Trust
      • London, United Kingdom, SW3 6JJ
        • The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Marsden Hospital
  • United States
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
        • University of Chicago Medical Center
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
        • IU Health University Hospital
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
        • Investigational Drug Services IUHSCC
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital
    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48201
        • Wayne State University, Dept. of Oncology
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
        • University of Minnesota Medical Center, Fairview
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
        • University of Minnesota Health Clinics and Surgery Center
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
        • University of Minnesota Medical Center, Fairview IDS Pharmacy
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
        • University of Minnesota Physicians Masonic Cancer Center
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
        • Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center Investigational Pharmacy
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84112
        • Huntsman Cancer Institute
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84112
        • Huntsman Cancer Hospital
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84132
        • John A Moran Eye Center
    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53792
        • University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53705
        • University Station Ophthalmology Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis - Dose Escalation Phase: Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of advanced solid tumor that is resistant to standard therapy or for which no standard therapy is available.
  • Diagnosis - Dose Expansion Phase: Histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced RCC with a component of clear cell subtype
  • Dose Expansion Phase: at least one measureable lesion as defined by RECIST [Response Evaluation Criterion in Solid Tumors] version 1.1.
  • ECOG [Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group] Performance Status 0 or 1.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Major surgery <4 weeks or radiation therapy <2 weeks of patient registration.
  • History of or known active seizure disorder, brain metastases, spinal cord compression, or carcinomatous meningitis, or new evidence of brain or leptomeningeal disease.
  • Dose Expansion Phase only: diagnosis of any other malignancy within 2 years prior to registration.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Axitinib in combination with crizotinib, escalation phase
Dose Escalation Advanced solid tumor that is resistant to standard therapy or for which no standard therapy is available
Drug: axitinib
Axitinib: tablets, dosage range 2 - 5 mg, given orally twice daily on a continuous dosing schedule in 28 days cycles.
Drug: crizotinib
Crizotinib: capsules, dosage range 200-250 mg, given orally twice daily or every day on a continuous dosing schedule in 28 days cycle.
Drug: axitinib
Axitinib: tablets, dosage be defined based on Arm 1 results, given orally twice daily on a continuous dosing schedule in 28 days cycles.
Drug: crizotinib
Crizotinib: capsules, dosage be defined based on Arm 1 results, given orally twice daily or every day on a continuous dosing schedule in 28 days cycle.
EXPERIMENTAL: Expansion Phase Cohort 1
Dose Expansion, Cohort 1: axitinib in combination with crizotinib Advanced renal cell cancer [RCC] with no prior systemic therapy
Drug: axitinib
Axitinib: tablets, dosage range 2 - 5 mg, given orally twice daily on a continuous dosing schedule in 28 days cycles.
Drug: crizotinib
Crizotinib: capsules, dosage range 200-250 mg, given orally twice daily or every day on a continuous dosing schedule in 28 days cycle.
Drug: axitinib
Axitinib: tablets, dosage be defined based on Arm 1 results, given orally twice daily on a continuous dosing schedule in 28 days cycles.
Drug: crizotinib
Crizotinib: capsules, dosage be defined based on Arm 1 results, given orally twice daily or every day on a continuous dosing schedule in 28 days cycle.
EXPERIMENTAL: Expansion Phase Cohort 2
Dose Expansion, Cohort 2: axitinib in combination with crizotinib Advanced renal cell cancer with at least one but no more than two prior systemic treatment regimens directed at advanced RCC
Drug: axitinib
Axitinib: tablets, dosage range 2 - 5 mg, given orally twice daily on a continuous dosing schedule in 28 days cycles.
Drug: crizotinib
Crizotinib: capsules, dosage range 200-250 mg, given orally twice daily or every day on a continuous dosing schedule in 28 days cycle.
Drug: axitinib
Axitinib: tablets, dosage be defined based on Arm 1 results, given orally twice daily on a continuous dosing schedule in 28 days cycles.
Drug: crizotinib
Crizotinib: capsules, dosage be defined based on Arm 1 results, given orally twice daily or every day on a continuous dosing schedule in 28 days cycle.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dose-Escalation Part: Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
Time Frame: Cycle 1 (28 days)
Toxicity as per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), version 4.03. DLT defined as any following events attributable to any (axitinib or crizotinib) or both agents in combination: hematologic (Grade 4 neutropenia, absolute neutrophil count<1000/mm^3 with single temperature of >38.3 degrees celsius or sustained temperature of 38 degrees celsius for >1 hour; >=Grade 3 neutropenic infection; >=Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding; Grade 4 thrombocytopenia), non-hematologic (>=Grade 3 toxicities [except asymptomatic hypophosphatemia, hyperuricemia without signs, symptoms of gout, and tumor lysis syndrome], nausea, vomiting or diarrhea persisted at Grade 3 or 4 despite maximal medical therapy; Grade 3 hypertension if persistent despite anti-hypertensives); In asymptomatic participant, Grade 3 QTc prolongation (QTc>=501 msec) if persisted after correcting reversible causes, and failure to deliver >=75 percent (%) of dose of each study drug.
Cycle 1 (28 days)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: First dose of study drug until 28 days after last dose (up to 35 cycles in Part 1 and 35 cycles in Part 2, each cycle 28 days)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drugs (crizotinib and axitinib) without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and until 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse events.
First dose of study drug until 28 days after last dose (up to 35 cycles in Part 1 and 35 cycles in Part 2, each cycle 28 days)
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: First dose of study drug until 28 days after last dose (up to 35 cycles in Part 1 and 35 cycles in Part 2, each cycle 28 days)
Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drugs (crizotinib and axitinib) in a participant who received study drugs. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and until 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse events.
First dose of study drug until 28 days after last dose (up to 35 cycles in Part 1 and 35 cycles in Part 2, each cycle 28 days)
Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) as Graded by National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Version 4.03
Time Frame: First dose of study drug until 28 days after last dose (up to 35 cycles in Part 1 and 35 cycles in Part 2, each cycle 28 days)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Grade 3 (severe) events=unacceptable or intolerable events, significantly interrupting usual daily activity, require systemic drug therapy/other treatment. Grade 4 (Life-threatening) events caused participant to be in imminent danger of death. Grade 5 = death. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and until 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse events.
First dose of study drug until 28 days after last dose (up to 35 cycles in Part 1 and 35 cycles in Part 2, each cycle 28 days)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities Based on National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Version 4.03: Hematological Test Abnormalities
Time Frame: Baseline up to end of treatment (up to 35 cycles in Part 1 and 35 cycles in Part 2, each cycle 28 days)
Laboratory parameters included hematological and biochemistry parameters. Hematological parameters included haemoglobin (anemia, haemoglobin increased), lymphocytes (lymphopenia, lymphocyte count increased), neutrophils, platelets and white blood cells. Number of participants with hematological abnormalities by grades (as per NCI CTCAE version 4.03) were reported. Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; Grade 3= severe and Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling.
Baseline up to end of treatment (up to 35 cycles in Part 1 and 35 cycles in Part 2, each cycle 28 days)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities Based on National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Version 4.03: Biochemistry Test Abnormalities
Time Frame: Baseline up to end of treatment (up to 35 cycles in Part 1 and 35 cycles in Part 2, each cycle 28 days)
Laboratory parameters included hematological and biochemistry parameters. Biochemistry parameters/abnormalities included alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, bilirubin (total), creatinine, hypercalcemia, hyperglycemia, hyperkalemia, hypermagnesemia, hypernatremia, hypoalbuminemia, hypocalcemia, hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, hyponatremia, hypophosphatemia and gamma glutamyl transferase Number of participants with biochemistry test abnormalities by grades (NCI CTCAE version 4.03) were reported. Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; Grade 3= severe and Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling.
Baseline up to end of treatment (up to 35 cycles in Part 1 and 35 cycles in Part 2, each cycle 28 days)
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Day 1, 15 of Cycle 1, Day 1 of Cycles 2, 4, 6, 12, 24 and End of Treatment Visit
Time Frame: Baseline; Day 1 and 15 of Cycle 1; Day 1 of Cycles 2, 4, 6, 12, 24; and end of treatment (up to a maximum duration of 35 cycles in Part 1 and 35 cycles in Part 2, each cycle 28 days)
Baseline; Day 1 and 15 of Cycle 1; Day 1 of Cycles 2, 4, 6, 12, 24; and end of treatment (up to a maximum duration of 35 cycles in Part 1 and 35 cycles in Part 2, each cycle 28 days)
Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Day 1, 15 of Cycle 1, Day 1 of Cycles 2, 4, 6, 12, 24 and End of Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline; Day 1 and 15 of Cycle 1; Day 1 of Cycles 2, 4, 6, 12, 24; and end of treatment (any time up to a maximum duration of 35 cycles in Part 1 and 35 cycles in Part 2, each cycle 28 days)
Baseline; Day 1 and 15 of Cycle 1; Day 1 of Cycles 2, 4, 6, 12, 24; and end of treatment (any time up to a maximum duration of 35 cycles in Part 1 and 35 cycles in Part 2, each cycle 28 days)
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Day 1, 15 of Cycle 1, Day 1 of Cycles 2, 4, 6, 12, 24 and End of Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline; Day 1 and 15 of Cycle 1; Day 1 of Cycles 2, 4, 6, 12, 24; and end of treatment (any time up to a maximum duration of 35 cycles in Part 1 and 35 cycles in Part 2, each cycle 28 days)
Baseline; Day 1 and 15 of Cycle 1; Day 1 of Cycles 2, 4, 6, 12, 24; and end of treatment (any time up to a maximum duration of 35 cycles in Part 1 and 35 cycles in Part 2, each cycle 28 days)
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) to Worst Value
Time Frame: Baseline, End of Treatment (up to Cycle 35 [for Part 1] and up to Cycle 35 [for Part 2], each cycle 28 days)
ECOG-PS: used to assess how disease affected the daily living abilities of participant. It ranges on the scale from: 0-5 (0=fully active/able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction;1=restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory/able to carry out light/sedentary work;2=ambulatory [for more than (>)50%of waking hours], capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities;3=capable of limited self-care, confined to bed or chair [for >50% of waking hours];4=completely disabled, not capable of any self-care, totally confined to bed or chair;5= dead, higher score=more functional impairment) and changes to worst status scores were presented. Baseline value=value collected prior to first dose of study drug on Cycle 1 Day 1. Worst post-baseline value=worst value between first dose of any study drug and end of treatment (EOT) visit. Shift to low refers to lower than Baseline value; shift to high refers to higher than baseline value for ECOG-PS.
Baseline, End of Treatment (up to Cycle 35 [for Part 1] and up to Cycle 35 [for Part 2], each cycle 28 days)
Number of Participants With Maximum Increase From Baseline in QTc Interval
Time Frame: Baseline, End of Treatment (up to Cycle 35 [for Part 1] and up to Cycle 35 [for Part 2], each cycle 28 days)
Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The time corresponding to beginning of depolarization to repolarization of the ventricles (QT interval) was adjusted for RR interval using QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR) and by Bazette's formula (QTcB = QT divided by square root of RR). Number of participants with maximum increase from baseline of less than (<) 30 milliseconds (msec), 30 to <60 msec and greater than or equal to (>=) 60 msec were reported.
Baseline, End of Treatment (up to Cycle 35 [for Part 1] and up to Cycle 35 [for Part 2], each cycle 28 days)
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Axitinib and Crizotinib
Time Frame: Axitinib: Pre-dose (0 hour [hr]), 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hrs post-dose at Lead-in Day 7, Cycle 1 Day 15; Crizotinib: pre-dose (0 hr), 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hrs post-dose at Cycle 1 Day 15
Data of this outcome measure was not planned to be analyzed for Cohort 2 in dose expansion part, as pre-specified in protocol.
Axitinib: Pre-dose (0 hour [hr]), 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hrs post-dose at Lead-in Day 7, Cycle 1 Day 15; Crizotinib: pre-dose (0 hr), 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hrs post-dose at Cycle 1 Day 15
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Axitinib and Crizotinib
Time Frame: Axitinib: Pre-dose (0 hour [hr]), 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hrs post-dose at Lead-in Day 7, Cycle 1 Day 15; Crizotinib: pre-dose (0 hr), 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hrs post-dose at Cycle 1 Day 15
Data of this outcome measure was not planned to be analyzed for Cohort 2 in dose expansion part, as pre-specified in protocol.
Axitinib: Pre-dose (0 hour [hr]), 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hrs post-dose at Lead-in Day 7, Cycle 1 Day 15; Crizotinib: pre-dose (0 hr), 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hrs post-dose at Cycle 1 Day 15
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Axitinib and Crizotinib
Time Frame: Axitinib: Pre-dose (0 hour [hr]), 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hrs post-dose at Lead-in Day 7, Cycle 1 Day 15; Crizotinib: pre-dose (0 hr), 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hrs post-dose at Cycle 1 Day 15
Area under the plasma concentration versus time-curve from time zero to end of dosing interval (AUCtau), where dosing interval was 12 hours. Data of this outcome measure was not planned to be analyzed for Cohort 2 in dose expansion part, as pre-specified in protocol.
Axitinib: Pre-dose (0 hour [hr]), 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hrs post-dose at Lead-in Day 7, Cycle 1 Day 15; Crizotinib: pre-dose (0 hr), 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hrs post-dose at Cycle 1 Day 15
Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of Axitinib and Crizotinib
Time Frame: Axitinib: Pre-dose (0 hour [hr]), 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hrs post-dose at Lead-in Day 7, Cycle 1 Day 15; Crizotinib: pre-dose (0 hr), 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hrs post-dose at Cycle 1 Day 15
Clearance of a drug is a measure of the rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. Apparent oral clearance was obtained by dividing study drug dose with AUCtau, where AUCtau was area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the quantifiable concentration at the end of dosing interval. Data of this outcome measure was not planned to be analyzed for Cohort 2 in dose expansion part, as pre-specified in protocol.
Axitinib: Pre-dose (0 hour [hr]), 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hrs post-dose at Lead-in Day 7, Cycle 1 Day 15; Crizotinib: pre-dose (0 hr), 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hrs post-dose at Cycle 1 Day 15
Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of Axitinib and Crizotinib
Time Frame: Axitinib: Pre-dose (0 hour [hr]), 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hrs post-dose at Lead-in Day 7, Cycle 1 Day 15; Crizotinib: pre-dose (0 hr), 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hrs post-dose at Cycle 1 Day 15
Volume of distribution is defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired plasma concentration of a drug. Apparent volume of distribution after oral dose (Vz/F) is influenced by the fraction absorbed.
Axitinib: Pre-dose (0 hour [hr]), 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hrs post-dose at Lead-in Day 7, Cycle 1 Day 15; Crizotinib: pre-dose (0 hr), 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hrs post-dose at Cycle 1 Day 15
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response
Time Frame: From Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (up to 35 cycles in Part 1 and 35 cycles in Part 2, each cycle 28 days)
Percentage of participants with objective response based on assessment of confirmed complete response [CR] or confirmed partial response [PR] according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors [RECIST] version1.1 were reported. Confirmed responses were those that persisted on repeat imaging study at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. CR was defined as disappearance of all lesions (target and/or non target). PR were those with at least 30 percent decrease in sum of the longest dimensions of target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions, with non target lesions not increased or absent.
From Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (up to 35 cycles in Part 1 and 35 cycles in Part 2, each cycle 28 days)
Dose Expansion Part: Duration of Response
Time Frame: From first objective response until first recurrent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first (up to 35 cycles, each cycle 28 days)
Duration of response (as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] version 1.1) was defined as the time (in months) from first documentation of objective tumor response (complete response [CR] or partial response [PR]) until the first date that recurrent, progressive disease, or death (whichever occurred first). CR was defined as disappearance of all lesions (target and/or non target). PR were those with at least 30 percent decrease in sum of the longest dimensions of target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions, with non target lesions not increased or absent. Progression was defined as >= 20 percent increase in sum of longest diameter of target lesions; measurable increase in non-target lesion; appearance of new lesions.
From first objective response until first recurrent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first (up to 35 cycles, each cycle 28 days)
Dose Expansion Part: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: From Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (up to 35 cycles, each cycle 28 days)
PFS (as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] version 1.1) was defined as the time (in months) from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS (in months) was calculated as (first event date minus date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 30.44. Progression was defined as >= 20 percent increase in sum of longest diameter of target lesions; measurable increase in non-target lesion; appearance of new lesions. PFS was not estimated in Dose Expansion Cohort 2 due to small sample size.
From Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (up to 35 cycles, each cycle 28 days)
Dose Expansion Part Cohort 1: Levels of Serum Soluble Protein Biomarkers
Time Frame: Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1, end of treatment (up to 35 cycles, each cycle 28 days)
Serum soluble protein biomarkers included angiopoietin-2, Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF), Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 3 (VEGFR 3). Biomarker analysis was not planned to be performed in dose escalation part and Cohort 2 of dose expansion part, as pre-specified in protocol.
Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1, end of treatment (up to 35 cycles, each cycle 28 days)
Dose Expansion Part Cohort 1: Change From Baseline in Serum Concentration of Circulating microRNAs (miRNA) at End of Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline, end of treatment (up to 35 cycles, each cycle 28 days)
Baseline, end of treatment (up to 35 cycles, each cycle 28 days)
Dose Expansion Part Cohort 1: Percentage of c-MET Positive Tumor Cell at Baseline in Relation to Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Time Frame: Baseline
Percentage of c-MET positive tumor cell for objective response (complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]) is reported. Objective response was defined as CR and PR. CR was defined as disappearance of all lesions (target and/or non target). PR were those with at least 30 percent decrease in sum of the longest dimensions of target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions, with non target lesions not increased or absent. Biomarker analysis was not planned to be performed in dose escalation part and Cohort 2 of dose expansion part, as pre-specified in protocol.
Baseline
Dose Expansion Part Cohort 1: Level of Plasma Soluble Protein Biomarker (c-MET)
Time Frame: Baseline; Day 1 and 15 of Cycle 1; Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 5; end of treatment (up to 35 cycles, each cycle 28 days)
Plasma soluble protein biomarker included c-MET. Biomarker analysis was not planned to be performed in dose escalation part and Cohort 2 of dose expansion part, as pre-specified in protocol.
Baseline; Day 1 and 15 of Cycle 1; Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 5; end of treatment (up to 35 cycles, each cycle 28 days)
Dose Expansion Part Cohort 1: Ratio of Serum Soluble Protein Biomarkers Level to Baseline Biomarkers Level by Each Timepoint
Time Frame: Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1, end of treatment (up to 35 cycles, each cycle 28 days)
Serum soluble protein biomarkers included angiopoietin-2, Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF), Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 3 (VEGFR3). Ratio=value of serum soluble protein biomarkers at each time point to the value at baseline. Biomarker analysis was not planned to be performed in dose escalation part and Cohort 2 of dose expansion part, as pre-specified in protocol.
Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1, end of treatment (up to 35 cycles, each cycle 28 days)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Pfizer

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 26, 2014

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 22, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 5, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 26, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 26, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 3, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 24, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 1, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • A4061068
  • 2015-001724-31 (EUDRACT_NUMBER)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Advanced Solid Tumors

Clinical Trials on axitinib

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings