Evaluation of a Non-invasive Device to Measure Blood Pressure and Difference in Pulse Pressure (dPP) Intraoperatively
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Mainz, Germany, 55131
- Universitaetsmedizin - Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (Department of Anesthesiology)
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age > 18 and < 80 years old
- Written informed consent obtained
- Patients scheduled for elective urological or abdominal surgery procedures in supine position
- qualifying for arterial line
Exclusion Criteria:
- pregnancy
- cardiac insufficiency (NYHA 4, EF < 25 %)
- coronary artery disease (CCS 4)
- coagulopathy
- symptoms of infection or sepsis
- malignant hyperthermia
- absence of sinus rhythm
- BMI > 30
- M. Raynaud
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Comparison between arterial line and non-invasive device for blood pressure and difference in pulse pressure measurement
Time Frame: intraoperatively
|
Systolic, diastolic, mean blood pressure and difference in pulse pressure are measured intraoperatively with a non-invasive device and the reference technique.
The values are compared using Bland-Altmann Analysis.
|
intraoperatively
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med. 2009 Sep;37(9):2642-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a590da.
- Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10.
- Pestel G, Fukui K, Hartwich V, Schumacher PM, Vogt A, Hiltebrand LB, Kurz A, Fujita Y, Inderbitzin D, Leibundgut D. Automatic algorithm for monitoring systolic pressure variation and difference in pulse pressure. Anesth Analg. 2009 Jun;108(6):1823-9. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181a2a8bf.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 837.531.11 (8073)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.