Retrospective Analysis of Survival in Adult MRD Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients

September 12, 2022 updated by: Amgen

A Retrospective Analysis of Hematological Relapse Free Survival and Overall Survival in Adult Patients With Philadelphia-Negative B-Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Complete Hematological Remission With Minimal Residual Disease

A retrospective analysis of historical data looking at relapse free survival and overall survival rates in adult philadelphia negative B-pre-cursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

A retrospective observational study reviewing historical survival data (relapse free survival and overall survival) for adult patients who have philadelphia negative B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and are in complete hematological remission with minimal residual disease.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
310

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Czechia
      • Brno, Czechia, 625 00
        • Research Site
  • France
      • Paris Cedex 10, France, 75475
        • Research Site
  • Germany
      • Frankfurt am Main, Germany, 60590
        • Research Site
  • Italy
      • Bologna, Italy, 40138
        • Research Site
      • Roma, Italy, 00161
        • Research Site
      • Venezia, Italy, 30174
        • Research Site
  • Poland
      • Gliwice, Poland, 44-101
        • Research Site
  • Russian Federation
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 125167
        • Research Site
  • Spain
    • Cataluña
      • Badalona, Cataluña, Spain, 08916
        • Research Site
  • United Kingdom
      • London, United Kingdom, NW3 2PF
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with Philadelphia-negative B-Precursor Acute Lyphmoblastic Leukemia in complete hematological remission defined as less than 5% blasts in bone marrow after at least 3 intensive chemotherapy blocks (i.e. any standard or investigational regimen according to adult protocols as long as 3 age appropriate chemotherapy blocks were given, this also includes relapse treatment
  • detection of minimal residual disease (molecular failure or molecular relapse) at a level of greater than or equal to 10*(-4) by PCR or greater than or equal to 10*(-3) by flow cytometry at a reference lab
  • Age 15 or greater at time of initial diagnosis with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. For patients aged 15-17 treatment according to adult protocols is required
  • Initial diagnosis in the year 2000 or later
  • History of acute lymphoblastic leukemia treatment (including response to first therapy, number of prior relapses) is available
  • Relapse status and disease follow up after timepoint of minimal residual disease detection is available

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with extramedullary disease at timepoint of minimal residual disease detection
  • Use of Blinatumomab within 18 months of minimal residual disease detection
  • Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation prior to minimal residual disease detection at the required level

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
primary
subjects who are 18 years or older, who have minimal residual disease detected by PCR at a level of 1/10-3 or higher, who are free form allogeneic stem cell transplantation until hematological relapse or until 18 months after minimal residual disease detection (whichever comes first)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
hematological relapse free survival
Time Frame: Approximately 18 months
to estimate the hematological relapse free survival in patients who are 18 years or older, who have minimal residual disease detected by PCR at a level of 1/10-3 or higher, who are free form allogeneic stem cell transplantation until hematological relapse or until 18 months after minimal residual disease detection (whichever comes first)
Approximately 18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
hematological relapse free survival
Time Frame: Approximately 18 months
to estimate the hematological relapse free survival in patients who are 15 years or older, who have minimal residual disease regardless of detection method, with or without stem cell transplantation within18 months of minimal residual disease detection
Approximately 18 months
overall survival
Time Frame: Approximately 18 months
to estimate overall survival in the 2 sets of patients described in the primary outcome measure, and the first secondary outcome measure.
Approximately 18 months
mortality rate
Time Frame: 100 days following allogeniec stem cell transplantation
to estimate the mortality rate (proportion) at 100 days following allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients who received an allogeneic stem cell transplantation within 18 months after minimal residual disease detection
100 days following allogeniec stem cell transplantation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Amgen

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
European EWALL study groups

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 25, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 10, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 13, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 15, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 12, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 20120148

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings