Thoracic And Lumbar Burst Fracture: Correlation Between Structural Changes And Clinical Outcome Of Treatment

February 26, 2014 updated by: Diego da Silva Collares, Hospital Ortopedico de Passo Fundo
Evaluate the correlation between the structural changes of fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine burst type with clinical outcome of the treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The treatment of burst fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine is still a subject of much discussion and debate in the literature, especially in patients without neurological deficit. Most authors recommend surgical treatment for patients whose fracture shows signs of instability: 50% loss of vertebral body height, kyphosis with more than 30 degrees, involvement of more than 50% of the spinal canal. The authors advocate that this type of treatment uses the shorter hospital stay, early patient mobility, better kyphosis correction, the possibility of spinal canal decompression and prevention of neurological deterioration, as arguments in its favor.However, observational studies in patients without neurological deficit, showed no difference in long-term functional outcomes in patients with this type of injury, regardless of the type of treatment used (surgical or conservative). This study will express the clinical results and morphological changes of the thoracic and lumbar spine, at a minimum follow-up of 24 months, comparing the findings of the patients undergoing surgical treatment with those found in undergoing conservative treatment.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
25

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Brazil
    • RS
      • Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil, 99010080
        • Hospital Ortopedico de Passo Fundo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

22 years to 69 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Surgical treatment Group: 14 samples Conservative Treatment Group: 11 samples

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with thoracic or lumbar burst fracture, without neurological lesion treated by the principal investigator of the study and periodically monitored in the Service of the researcher, Orthopedic Hospital of Passo Fundo, with minimum follow-up of 24 months fracture.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with neurological deficit or who have left before 24 months the follow-up.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Conservative Treatment
Eleven patients underwent conservative treatment with Brace.
Device: Brace
Toracolumbar imobilization
Other Names:
  • Jewett
  • Putti
Surgical Treatment
Fourteen patients who underwent surgical treatment (arthrodesis).
Procedure: Arthrodesis
Posterior approach to toracolumbar spine fusion.
Other Names:
  • TLIF
  • PLIF

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical and radiological outcome after two years of follow up: Pain (VAS), deformity (degrees) and quality of life (SF36 questionary)
Time Frame: Over Two Years
Retrospective review of medical records and imaging studies (radiographs and CT scans) of 30 patients without neurological deficit, with fractures of the thoracic and lumbar burst-type, in the archives of the Orthopedic Hospital of Passo Fundo, in the period between 2002 to 2011 submitted the clinical follow-up or post-operative periodical by the principal investigator of the study. The fractures, of the selected patients will be classified according to Magerl et al. (AO). Minimum follow-up is 24 months. It should be emphasized that all patients underwent at follow-up, the measurement of visual analog pain scale (VAS), the SF36 quality of life questionnaire, radiographic measurements of kyphosis, collapse and narrowing of the spinal canal. The clinical results obtained with conservative and surgical treatment will be compared and correlated with the morphological changes presented by the fractured vertebra.
Over Two Years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hospital Ortopedico de Passo Fundo

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Diego S Collares, MD, Hospital Ortopedico de Passo Fundo
  • Study Director: Rodrigo A Tisot, MD, Hospital Ortopedico de Passo Fundo
  • Principal Investigator: Andrius Berardi, MD, Hospital Ortopedico de Passo Fundo

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 25, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 26, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 3, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 3, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 26, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 314151 (Registry Identifier: Fratura Explosão)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings