Mobile Transmission of Prehospital Vital Signs to the Emergency Department
Telemedical Solutions in Medical Emergencies, Advantages and Disadvantages for Patients, Healthcare Professionals, and the Healthcare System: Study 1: "Mobile Transmission of Prehospital Vital Signs to the Emergency Department - Effect on Patient Outcomes, Treatment and Diagnosis"
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Aarhus N, Denmark, 8200
- Prehospital Emergency Medical Services, Aarhus, Central Denmark Region
-
Horsens, Denmark, 8700
- Horsens Regional Hospital, Central Region Denmark
-
Horsens, Denmark, 8700
- Responce A/S
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All patients transported with ambulance to the emergency department
Exclusion Criteria:
- None
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Transmission of vital signs, ecg, chat
Data from patients transported in ambulances with equipment which enables real time transmission of vital signs, ecg and chat from ambulances to the emergency department.
|
Other Names:
|
|
No Intervention: No transmission of data
Patient transported with conventional ambulances without the possibility to transmit real time patient related data.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Time to physician
Time Frame: Time from arrival to first patient-physician contact, assessed up to 36 months
|
Time from the patient arrival registered in the patients' logistics system (Cetrea) to registered first patient/physician contact registered in the same patients logistics system.
|
Time from arrival to first patient-physician contact, assessed up to 36 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
All cause mortality
Time Frame: 30 days, assessed up to 36 months
|
30 days, assessed up to 36 months
|
|
|
Time to treatment
Time Frame: Time from arrival to administration of first iv. antibiotics, assessed up to 36 months
|
Time from the patient arrival registered in the patients' logistics system (Cetrea) to first administered iv antibiotics registered in the patient's hospital record
|
Time from arrival to administration of first iv. antibiotics, assessed up to 36 months
|
|
Time to x-ray
Time Frame: Time form arrival at the emergency department to completion of x-ray requisition form, assessed up to 36 months
|
Time from the patient arrival registered in the patients' logistics system (Cetrea) to completion of x-ray requisition form registered in the radiologic logistics system (Kodak RIS, 2010 edition)
|
Time form arrival at the emergency department to completion of x-ray requisition form, assessed up to 36 months
|
|
Time to ICU
Time Frame: Time from arrival to admission to the ICU, assessed up to 36 months
|
Time from the patient arrival registered in the patients' logistics system (Cetrea) to time of admission to the ICU registered in the patient's hospital record. .
|
Time from arrival to admission to the ICU, assessed up to 36 months
|
|
Number of ICU admissions
Time Frame: During present hospitalization, assessed up to 36 months
|
During present hospitalization, assessed up to 36 months
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Emergency department staff evaluation of usability of equipment
Time Frame: At the time of using the equipment, assessed up to 36 months
|
The staff at the emergency department fill out a survey after the use of the equipment which provides ecg, vital signs, chat.
|
At the time of using the equipment, assessed up to 36 months
|
|
Ambulance staff evaluation of usability of equipment
Time Frame: At the time of using the equipment, assessed up to 36 months
|
The ambulance staff fill out a survey after the use of the equipment which provides ecg, vital signs, chat.
|
At the time of using the equipment, assessed up to 36 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Erika F. Christensen, MD, Medical director, Central Denmark Region
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- NRAA
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Telemedicine
-
NCT03689140CompletedUsual Care | Telemedicine: Smoking Cessation App Only | Telemedicine: Smoking Cessation Counseling | Telemedicine: App + Counseling
-
NCT06639568Completed
-
NCT02644343Completed
-
NCT05636982Completed
-
NCT06171763Completed