Safety and Efficacy Study of Allogeneic Adipose-derived Stem Cells for Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis

November 22, 2016 updated by: Anterogen Co., Ltd.

A Multi-center, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Phase I/II Clinical Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Allogeneic Adipose-derived Stem Cells for the Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of allogeneic adipose-derived stem cells (ALLO-ASC) in patients with lateral epicondylitis.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Korea, Republic of
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Seoul National University Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Asan Medical Center
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Samsung Medical Center
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Gangnam Severance Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Chung-Ang University Hosptal
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Nanoori hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Older than 19 years.
  2. Patients who are diagnosed as lateral epicondylitis (Pain≥4 of VAS during activity).
  3. Patients who has sustained pain more than 6 months
  4. Patients who lasting for pain in spite of conservative therapy
  5. Patients who have one lesion under ultrasonic photography
  6. Negative for urine beta-HCG for women of childbearing age
  7. Patient who is able to give written informed consent prior to study start and to comply with the study requirements

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who has been experienced steroid and prolotherapy or other treatment within 3 months at screening time
  2. Patients who have lesion size of width and length more than 1 cm using ultrasonic photography test
  3. Patients who were accompanied by the disease as follows: A. Arthritis of related joint to the target lesion (ex, cubital osteo- arthritis), B.Synovitis of related joint to the target lesion, C.Entrapment of related nerve to the target lesion(ex, radial tunnel syndrome), D.Generalized pain syndrome, E.Radiculopathy related to the target lesion(ex, cervical spodylosis ,cervical radicular syndrome), F.Rheumatoid arthritis, G.Previous fracture of arm causing limitations in arm function, H.Impaired sensibility, I.Paralysis
  4. Patients who are pregnant or breast-feeding
  5. Patients who have allergic or hypersensitive reaction to bovine-derived proteins or fibrin glue
  6. Patients who have history of fracture and dislocation at Ipsilateral upper extremity within 2 years recently
  7. Patients who have operation history in tendon, ligament and bone at Ipsilateral upper extremity within 2 years recently
  8. Patients who are unwilling to use an "effective" method of contraception during the study
  9. Patients who have a clinically relevant history of abuse of alcohol or drugs
  10. Patients who are considered not suitable for the study by investigator
  11. Patients who have experienced treatment with stem cell before this study
  12. Patients who currently enrolled in another investigational drug study within 30 days of screening

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Saline injection
Drug: Placebo
Other Names:
  • 0.9% Saline
Experimental: treatment
ALLO-ASC-TI injection
Biological: ALLO-ASC-TI
Other Names:
  • Allogenic adipose-derived stem cell

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy
Time Frame: Week 12
Improvement of VAS pain score at 12 weeks compared to baseline per each group
Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
VAS pain score
Time Frame: week 2, week 6 and week 12
Changes in the VAS pain score during activity per each group
week 2, week 6 and week 12
Improvement rate of VAS pain score
Time Frame: week 2, week 6 and week 12
Improvement rate of VAS pain score at rest per each group
week 2, week 6 and week 12
Modified Mayo Clinic Performance Index
Time Frame: week 2, week 6 and week 12
Change in Modified Mayo Clinic Performance Index per each group
week 2, week 6 and week 12
Ultrasonic photography
Time Frame: week 6 and week 12
Change in analysis of lesion size per each group
week 6 and week 12
Safety
Time Frame: Week 12
Clinically measured abnormality of laboratory tests and adverse events
Week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Anterogen Co., Ltd.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: S G Chung, M.D., Ph.D, Seoul National University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 29, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 5, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 6, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 23, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 22, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ALLO-ASC-TI-201

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings